Critical Reasoning Flashcards

1
Q

tendency for a person’s expectations about the future to influence the future in a way that makes the expectations come true

A

Self-fulfilling prophecy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

For example, if I hear that Wilbur is hostile before I ever meet him, I may be more likely to be hostile when I do meet him (“He’s hostile, so I’d better beat him to the punch”). And this may lead him to react with hostility, even though he would have been friendly if I’d been friendly myself. My prediction leads me to act in a way that makes my prediction come true.

A

Self-fulfilling prophecy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

We commit this fallacy if we judge it more likely that Mike is a pro football player than a banker (thus ignoring the fact that there are far more bankers than pro football players).

A

Base rate fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Ignoring statistical information in favor of using irrelevant information, that one incorrectly believes to be relevant, to make a judgment. This usually stems from the irrational belief that statistics don’t apply in a situation, for one reason or another when, in fact, they do.

A

Base rate fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Only 6% of applicants make it into this school, but my son is brilliant! They are certainly going to accept him!

A

Base rate fallacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Wilbur’s factory has been selling two models of car stereos, one for $200 and one for $300, they may be able to increase the sales of the $300 model by bringing out a $400 model.

A

Compromise effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A good deal of research shows that many of us are reluctant to buy either the highest-, or the lowest-priced item. We prefer to “compromise” on a price some- where in between.

A

Compromise effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common tendency to look for evidence that confirms our hypotheses and or beliefs, and to overlook evidence that tells against them.

A

Confirmation Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Wilbur is already convinced that women are bad drivers, he may be more likely to notice or remember cases where women drove badly and to overlook or forget cases where they drive well.

A

Confirmation Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Wilbur might wonder whether Wilma has a crush on him. The fact that she goes out of her way to chat with him is confirming, though by no means conclusive, evidence that she does. And the fact that she sometimes seems to avoid him is disconfirming evidence, though it doesn’t prove that she doesn’t.

A

Confirmation Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

P(A|B) = P(B|A)

A

Confusion of the Inverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

The probability that it is cloudy outside given that it is raining does not equal the probability that it is raining given it is cloudy outside.

A

Confusion of the Inverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Most drug addicts started using drugs with marijuana, therefore marijuana users are likely to move on to hard drugs[

A

Confusion of the Inverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Most accidents occur within 25 miles from home, which means you are safer further from home

A

Confusion of the Inverse

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

evaluations of, or judgments about, something are influenced by the contrast between it and things around it

A

Contrast effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

If the job applicant interviewed right before Wilbur does a terrible job, Wilbur is likely to seem better just by comparison

A

Contrast effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

the agent might discourage a person from buying a house by showing him a much better house first. And if you are in the market for a house, it is usually unwise to look at houses you know you can’t afford.

A

Contrast effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

when a number of people are present, and the responsibility diffuses or radiates throughout the group, so that no one feels particularly accountable.

A

Diffusion of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

when other people are present, people in general are more likely to stand by and do nothing.

A

Diffusion of responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

members of a group often do less than when working alone

A

Social Loafing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

lead someone to believe or do something by first asking them to do something bigger (or to believe something less probable), which you know they will refuse. After the larger request is refused, the person is often more likely to do or believe the second, smaller, thing.

A

Door in the face Technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

When we predict how long we will feel about some event, we tend to over-estimate the duration of the emotional impact.
Whatever our emotions, although we have ups and downs, we tend to return to a neutral ‘home’ position within a relatively short time.

A

Durability Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

I think about how I would feel if my girlfriend left me. I suspect I would feel very upset and believe I would feel this way for a long time to come. The fact that I might meet someone else before long and change how I feel does not come into my thinking.

A

Durability Bias

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

We would typically require more money to sell something we already have than we would pay to buy it

A

Endowment effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

This causes a mismatch between buyers and sellers, where buyers are often willing to spend less than the seller deems an acceptable price.

A

Endowment effect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

In a real-life study a number of housewives were asked a few questions about which soaps they used. A few days later both the group who had answered these questions and another group who had not been contacted before were asked if a survey team could come to their home and spend two hours recording every product that they owned. Housewives who had agreed to the small requests (to answer a few questions about soap) were over twice as likely to accede to the much larger request.

A

Foot-in-the-door technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

A salesman at the door often asks for something small like a glass of water. Once the resident agrees to that request, the salesman has a better chance of getting them to buy something.

A

Foot-in-the-door technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

The foot-in-the-door technique involves getting someone to do or believe something that is reasonably small. After they do agree to the small request, the person is more likely to comply with a larger request or suggestion.

A

Foot-in-the-door technique

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

occurs when the views of group members already incline towards being risky.

A

Risky shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

occurs when people who take part in a group discussion are willing to support riskier decisions than they would individually, before the group discussion.

A

Risky shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

when a group collectively agrees on a course of action that is more extreme than they would have made if asked individually.

A

Risky shift

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

a situational predicament in which people are or feel themselves to be at risk of confirming negative stereotypes about their social group.

A

Stereotype threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Black students performed lower on tests when they were made to feel inferior before the tests.

A

Stereotype threat

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

basing a decision on past investments (that are already gone) rather than on current prospects

A

sunk cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

When a country is involved in a war that they aren’t winning, one of the justifications typically offered to keep fighting, even when it can only lead to further disaster, is that “if we don’t, all those soldiers who died will have died in vain.”

A

sunk cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Sometimes it is important to us to follow through on a plan or commitment because we want to be the sort of person who finishes the things they start.

A

sunk cost

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

occurs because of our strong tendency to overestimate the significance of internal
causes and to underestimate the power of external (situational) causes.

A

Fundamental attribution error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

I assume you have not done much today because you are lazy, rather than perhaps tired or lack the right resources.

A

Fundamental attribution error

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

When we are playing the role of observer, which is largely when we look at others, we make this fundamental attribution error. When we are thinking about ourselves, however, we will tend to make situational attributions.

A

Fundamental attribution error

40
Q

A B C occur together with x y z
A D E occur together with x v w also B C occur with y z
——————————————————
Therefore A is the cause, or the effect, or a part of the cause of x.

A

Joint method of agreement and difference

41
Q

if in all cases where an effect occurs, there is a single prior factor C that is common to all those cases, then C is the cause of the effect

A

Mill’s method of agreement

42
Q

A B C D occur together with w x y z
A E F G occur together with w t u v
——————————————————
Therefore A is the cause, or the effect, of w.

A

Mill’s method of agreement

43
Q

A B C D occur together with w x y z
B C D occur together with x y z
——————————————————
Therefore A is the cause, or the effect, or a part of the cause of w.

A

method of difference

44
Q

a loss of a given size seems bigger than a gain of the same size

A

Loss aversion

45
Q

A loss of $100 is more painful than the pleasure derived from a gain of $100.

A

Loss aversion

46
Q

The upshot of our discussion of framing is that the risks people are willing to take depend on whether they frame something as a potential gain or as a potential loss. in this case, it is framed as a loss…

A

Loss aversion

47
Q

to get someone to participate in an event of gambling, you have to at least present him a 2:1 odds… a pain of a loss is two times more painful than a gain of the same size.

A

Loss Aversion

48
Q

a perfectionist, someone who needs to be assured that their every purchase or decision was the best that could be made. The way they know for certain is to consider all the alternatives they can imagine. This creates a psychologically daunting task, which can become even more daunting as the number of options increases.

A

Maximizers

49
Q

has criteria and standards, but is not worried about the possibility that there might be something better.

A

Satisficer

50
Q

A B C occur together with x y z
A± B C results in x± y z.
—————————————————————
Therefore A and x are causally connected

A

method of concomitant variation

51
Q

Changing the magnitude of one factor results in the change in the magnitude of another factor.

A

method of concomitant variation

52
Q

less blatant racism that takes more subtle and indirect forms

A

modern racism

53
Q

a phenomenon in which predictions about how much time will be needed to complete a future task display an optimistic bias (underestimate the time needed), regardless of past completion times for similar projects.

A

planning fallacy

54
Q

it will only take me 30 min to clean my room, so their is no rush

A

planning fallacy

55
Q

when several gas stations on the East Coast wanted to charge people more for using a credit card (because this entailed more expense for the gas station), their credit-card-using customers strongly objected to this “credit card surcharge”. The charge was framed as a penalty or a loss. But when the gas stations reframed the policy as a discount for using cash—which amounted to exactly the same thing in terms of the overall cost—their customers were more willing to accept it.

A

Preference reversal

56
Q

For example, if subjects are offered one of two op- tions and asked to choose one of the pair, they tend to focus on the positive features of the two things. But when they are asked to reject one of the two (which leads to exactly the same result, namely getting one of the two things), they focus more on negative features (which is thought to be more compatible with the instruction to reject).

A

Preference reversal

57
Q

In a range of cases, responses seem tailored to be compatible with the statement of the problem or task, and this can lead to

A

Preference reversal

58
Q

when the way we word or conceptualize alternatives influences which alternative people prefer. this leads answers to be tailored to fit a certain problem.

A

Preference reversal

59
Q

You have decided to see a play where admission is $10 per ticket. As you enter the theater you discover that you have lost a $10 bill. Would you still pay $10 for a ticket to the play?

You have decided to see a play and paid the admission price of $10 per ticket. As you enter the theater you discover that you have lost the ticket. The seat was not marked and the ticket cannot be recovered. Would you pay $10 for another ticket?

In Case 2 the respondents seem to add the second $10 to the overall amount they would be spending on a ticket, and they aren’t willing to pay $20 to see the play. In this scenario people see the entire $20 coming out of their “budget for play.” But in the first case the $10 they lost comes out of a different psychological account—not out of the account set aside for seeing plays—so they see the ticket as costing just $10.

A

Psychological accounting

60
Q

When we get windfalls, “easy money” we tend to think of it as less valuable than money we work hard for. An extreme example of this occurs when people are gambling. They tend to think of their winnings as “house money” which is not quite their own. So they find it easy to bet with it (and, typically, to lose it).

A

Psychological accounting

61
Q

ex. buying shots with a credit card vs. using cash…

A

Psychological accounting

62
Q

people have an inner need to ensure that their beliefs and behaviors are consistent. Inconsistent or conflicting beliefs leads to disharmony, which people strive to avoid.

A

Cognitive Dissonance

63
Q

beliefs about ourselves seem to be in contradiction with our actions, so people will try to eliminate, or at least reduce it, which leads to a change in attitude or beliefs so that they can be in line with our actions.

A

Reduction Cognitive Dissonance

64
Q

Change the conflicting belief so that it is consistent with other beliefs or behaviors.

A

Reduction Cognitive Dissonance

65
Q

Focus on more supportive beliefs that outweigh the dissonant belief or behavior.

A

Reduction Cognitive Dissonance

66
Q

Reduce the importance of the conflicting belief.

A

Reduction Cognitive Dissonance

67
Q

wanting to keep things the way there are now

A

Status quo bias

68
Q

Unless things are going badly, people often prefer to keep things the same rather than risk trying something new. Loss aversion helps explain this, since the potential disadvantages of changing things loom larger than the potential advantages.

A

Status quo bias

69
Q

Sometimes there will be exceptions, cases where the formula very obviously gets things wrong. When this occurs, we should ignore the formula. But the vital point here is this: most cases are not exceptions.

A

broken leg cases

70
Q

Neither the formula nor the experts are infallible, and an expert will (over the long run) get some cases right that the formula gets wrong. But in areas where a formula does better, overall, than the experts, there will be even more cases that the formula gets right and that the expert gets wrong. (could be linked to confirmation bias on the expert side)

A

broken leg cases

71
Q

Go with the predications of experts (you can choose any experts you like,
perhaps various coaches and sports writers).
Or go with your own best educated guesses about who will win (gut).

A

clinical or intuitive method

72
Q

Use a formula that has been carefully developed for making such predictions.

A

Statistical or mechanical method

73
Q

In fact “formulas” or computer programs have been found to make more accu- rate predictions than experts in many areas, to be just an good as experts in many others, and to be less accurate than experts in only a few. this is because the formula isn’t exposed to many of the human faults in reasonings

A

why use a formula

74
Q

A clinical psychologist’s interview with a patient or a personnel officer’s interview with a job candidate may supply highly relevant information. But the much great danger, though, is that such subjective judgments often lead us to completely ignore other information that is at least as, or even more, relevant.

A

problems with interviews

75
Q

people tend to put a greater degree of weight on interviews as opposed to the other available information.

A

Problems with interviews

76
Q

Moreover, they are immune to the various limitations and biases and fallacies that limit human reasoning.

A

why use a formula

77
Q

he supposed tendency of humans to quickly return to a relatively stable level of happiness despite major positive or negative events or life changes.

A

hedonic adaptation

78
Q

a phenomenon in which people quickly become used to changes, great or terrible, in order to maintain a stable level of happiness.

A

hedonic adaptation

79
Q

buying more won’t make you happier…

A

hedonic adaptation

80
Q

my feeling of supreme coolness with my beats was short lived. I returned to my usual level of happiness, which isn’t that happy.

A

hedonic adaptation

81
Q

Suppose that the following televisions are put together on display:
36-inch Panasonic for $690 42-inch Toshiba for $850 50-inch Philips for $1,480
People will tend to buy the Toshiba.

A

compromise effect

82
Q

When choosing between a nice pen for $25 and that same pen on sale for $18 at a store 15 minutes away, most people will decide to take the 15-minute trip to save the $7. But when choosing between a nice suit for $455 and that same suit on sale for $448 at a store 15 minutes away, most people will decide not to take the 15-minute trip.

A

psychological accounting

83
Q

“’Another example of the same hook is the ‘30-day money-back guarantee.’ If we are not sure whether or not we should get a new sofa, the guarantee of being able to change our mind later may push us over the hump so that we end up getting it. We fail to appreciate how our perspective will shift once we have it at home, and how we will start viewing the sofa as ours and consequently start viewing returning it as a loss.”

A

loss aversion to explain the endowment effect

84
Q

People who would use a credit card to pay $2.50 for a gallon of gas, even if they could get a five-cent-per-gallon “discount” for paying cash, will often pay $2.45 cash to avoid a five-cent credit card “surcharge.”

A

Preference Reversal

85
Q

From a medical textbook: “When a patient consults his physician with an undiagnosed disease, neither he nor the doctor knows whether it is rare until the diagnosis is finally made. Statistical methods can only be applied to a population of thousands. The individual either has a rare disease or doesn’t have it; the relative incidence of two diseases is completely irrelevant to the problem of making his diagnosis.” What fallacy is this textbook encouraging us to make?

A

base rate fallacy

86
Q

You have returned to OU after spending a glorious vacation in Hawaii, and you are miserable because you wish you were in Hawaii.

A

contrast effect

87
Q

If blacks are thought to be lazy, they find it hard to get jobs. In consequence they are seen idling around the streets, thus confirming the belief that they are lazy.

A

Self-Fulfilling Prophecy

88
Q

In the experiment in which students ate grasshoppers, those who had been pressured by the cold, unfriendly experimenter said that they liked the grasshoppers more than those in the group that had been asked by the nice friendly experimenter. What is this experiment supposed to indicate?

A

Reduction of Cognitive Dissonance

89
Q

Studies often confuse the probability that a person who offers physical resistance will be raped with the probability that a person who was raped offered physical resistance.

A

Confusion of the Inverse

90
Q

Driving close to home is more dangerous than driving on long trips: most accidents occur close to home.

A

Base Rate Fallacy

91
Q

A teacher says that a health problem is a lot more serious now than it was a century ago because a lot more people are dying from it. A student responds that there are a lot more people now than there were a century ago. What fallacy is the student suggesting that the teacher is committing?

A

Base Rate Fallacy

92
Q

If subjects are offered one of two options and ask to choose one of the pair, they tend to focus on the positive features of the two things. But when they are asked to reject one of the two (which leads to exactly the same result, namely getting one of the two things), they focus more on negative features. This can lead to their choosing the opposite option. (Two answers are possible here. Give one of them.)

A

Preference Reversal or Confirmation Bias

93
Q

Doctors at Harvard Medical School were given two descriptions of the short-term outcomes of surgery for lung cancer. When they were told that the short-term outcome of the surgery was a one-month survival rate of 90%, 84% of the physicians chose it. When they were told that there was a 10% mortality in the first month, 50% of the physicians chose another method of treatment. (Kahneman, Thinking, Fast and Slow)

A

Preference Reversal

94
Q

If people don’t tip a waiter, we conclude that they are stingy. If they don’t go to work, they are lazy. If they don’t return phone calls, they are rude. If they don’t smile, they are aloof. If they hurt you, they are cruel.

A

Fundamental Attribution Error

95
Q

Most of us would be willing to drive across town to save $50 on the purchase of a $100 radio but not on the purchase of a $100,000 automobile.

A

Psychological Accounting

96
Q

Comparing two sorts of colonoscopies, Kahneman discovered that people preferred the colonoscopy that had more pain! Why did they prefer the colonoscopy that had more pain?

A

As Dr. Kahneman’s experiments show, the pain at the end — whether it is getting better or worse — plays a disproportionately large role in determining how we remember an experience.
Dr. Kahneman’s conclusion was that people don’t evaluate the pain of an experience by summing up the overall total. Instead, they remember the pain at the very end — and whether it got better or worse.
how bad (or good) was the most intense part of the experience and what did we feel right before the experience ended
our taste and decisions are shaped by memories and the memories can be wrong since the memories only remember the peak and how it ended not the actual pleasure or pain experienced.