Critical Inquiry Exam 1 Flashcards
Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) or Evidence-Based Clinical Decision Making includes what 3 components?
Best Evidence
Clinical Experience
Patient Preference
Nonexperimental Evidence (clinical experience) tends to overestimate or underestimte efficacy?
Overestimate
For any single study, the most you can say is that the findings for this group, given this procedure, are not likely to have occurred __________.
by chance alone
The primary aim of a scientific experiment is not to precipitate decisions, but to make an appropriate adjustment in the degree to which one….__________
believes the hypothesis being tested.
Background questions refer to _________, while foreground questions relate to_________.
general knowledge about a disorder or intervention
specific information that will guide management of the patient
The clinical question should include the PICO acronym P: I: C: O:
Population: target group, including relevant characteristics
Intervention: What is the treatment?/May also be a prognostic factor or diagnostic test
C: Comparison group (relevant when two or more treatments are being compared)
O: Outcome (what is the outcome of interest - relevant measurements)
Database
compilation of topic-related information
Search engine
Retrieval system (typically searches multiple databases simultaneously)
Can you access PubMed at IHP?
Yes. At the bottom of IHP webpages, click on library. (library.mghihp.edu)
Searching:
Wild Card
helps with different forms of a work (ex: patell*)
Boolean Operators:
AND:
OR:
NOT:
AND: both, narrower
OR: either, broader (good for synonyms)
NOT: only one
Literal Search
Conducts search for combination of terms in particular order designated
Searching:
Quotation Marks
Will locate only items contains words “together and in that exact order”
Sparse search results are those with ___ hits and are said to have ___ sensitivity.
1-2 hits
low sensitivity
Excessive search results are those with ___ hits and are said to have ___ sensitivity and ___ specificity.
20,000
high sensitivity
low specificity
Point Estimate
The true risk of the outcome in the population is not known and the best we can do is “estimate [of] the true risk based on the sample of patients in the trial.”
If the confidence interval (CI) is fairly narrow, what does this tell us about the point estimate?
If the CI is fairly narrow, then we can be sure that our point estimate is a precise reflection of the population value.
What must be true for the result to be statistically significant at the 0.05 level?
If the result is statistically significant at the 0.05 level, the value corresponding to “no effect” must fall outside the 95% CI.
Questions to ask before you decide to apply the results of the study to your patient:
Is my patient so different from those in the study that the results cannot apply?
Is the treatment feasible in my setting?
Will the potential benefits of treatment outweigh the potential harms of treatment for my patient?
The relative risk (RR) is defined as:
risk of outcome in treatment group/risk of outcome in control group
The relative risk tell us _______. RR < 1 tells us the treatment ____ the risk of the outcome. RR > 1 tells us the treatment ___ the risk of the outcome.
How many times more likely is in that an event will occur in the treatment group relative to the control group.
RR < 1 tells us the treatment DECREASES the risk of the outcome.
RR > 1 tells us the treatment INCREASES the risk of the outcome.
Absolute Risk Reduction (ARR) or absolute risk difference:
risk of outcome in control group - risk of outcome in treatment group
Relative Risk Reduction (RRR)
absolute risk reduction / risk of outcome in control group.
RRR tells us the reduction in the rate of the outcome in the treatment group relative to that in the control group.
Number Needed to Treat (NNT)
1 / ARR
Number of patients we need to treat with the experimental therapy in order to prevent 1 bad outcome (incorporates duration of treatment)
dichotomous outcomes
yes or no outcomes that happen or don’t happen
“Gold Standard” of experimental trials:
Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)
Random selection:
Goal?
refers to choosing subjects
everyone in the defined population has an equally likely chance of being chosen.
Needn’t be from the entire population but a defined subgroup.
Goal: maximize generalizability
3 violations of random selection
Sample of convenience (all available who meet criteria)
Consecutive/Rolling Recruitment
Purposive Sample (purposefully biased)
Random Allocation
Goal?
Has to do with how subjects get into groups
-should ALWAYS be done except where subjects are grouped by preexisting conditions
Goal: make groups as alike as possible on known and unknown factors
2 reasons to have a covariate
- you think it will affect the relationship between the IV and DV
- because it is also of interest but not of prime interest
Note that adding covariate may create subgroups
Ex. 1A is female, 1B is male, 2A is female, 2B is male
Unocontrolled Variable
a variable that you think might affect the relationship between your IV and DV but choose not to assess (too expensive, time consuming, etc.).
You acknowledge the failure to measure it as a limitation to your study.
Confounder
Special case of covariate. The covariate has an independent relationship with both the IV and DV.
May lead you to a false conclusion about the relationship between IV and DV.
Controlled Variable
something that you address before the study begins, and control from varying. These variables conceptually vary among people, but will not vary in your study.
Example, choose only females in order to rule out gender as an explanation for the observed difference or association between groups.
Internal Validity
Credibility
The degree to which the study minimized alternative explanations (chance, bias, confounding) for the findings
Compliance Bias
People stay in the study but cooperate differently between groups
Loss to Follow Up (Attrition)
People leave the study either during the intervention (attrition) or fail to keep follow-up appointments or submit follow-up questionnaires differently between groups. This could be do to random error, but the concern is that: subjects in one group may be more likely to be compliant or more likely to remain in the study than the other group.