Critical appraisal Flashcards
what is selection bias?
a systematic difference in the recruitment of comparisson groups attributable to incomplete randomisation
…a few really sick patients were given the intervention on compassionate grounds
what is performance bias in an RCT?
a systemiatic difference in the treatment being provided to each comparison group, apart from the intervention being studied
what is exclusion bias in RCTs?
systematic difference in the number of patients who withdraw/do not complete follow-up between the comparison groups
what is detection bias in RCTs?
a systematic difference in the methods used for measuring outcomes between the comparison groups
what is the problem with a non-randomised controlled clinical trail?
non-randomisation avoids controlling selection bias.
this usually means there will be a distinct difference between the intervention and control group that invalidates any difference measured being attributable to the intervention
what 4 questions should you ask about a study population?
- How were the subjects receruited?
- err: advertising in the newspaper rather than asking service users
- Who was included in this trail?
- err: pharmakokinetic trials in 23-year-old male volunteers
- Who was excluded from this trial?
- err: moderate-/severe-heart failure patients from hospital outpatients, excluding mild disease from general practice
- Were these patients treated in ‘real-life’ circumstances?
- err: admitted to hospital to monitor compliance
what is recruitment bias?
a systematic error in identifying the group of volunteers from which the samples are selected
…advertising your study in the newspaper will have a recruitment bias towards people motivated to read the newspaper
what biases are most common in prospective cohort studies?
- selection bias
- are the cohorts selected really from the same population?
- are any group of subjects at particular risk of developing an outcome?
- attrition bias
- >20% loss-to-follow up of either group is too much
- systematic difference in withdrawal in either cohort
- systematic difference in those who withdrew and those that stayed within cohorts
what biases are most common in retrospective cohort studies?
- selection bias
- inadequate standardisation of outcomes measurment
- will be taking data from the medical records of the patients in each cohort. the investigators will have no way of controlling how these data were collected
- maybe incomplete/inaccurate. the dismissial of these patients from the cohort introduces a resulting attrition bias
what is a case-control study?
a retrospective observational study used to identify possible causative factors contributing to the disease
identify a cohort of ‘cases’ and a matching cohort of ‘controls’ without the disease and look back through records to identify a common exposure in the case cohort that the outcome could be attributable to
what is the name of the critical appraisal checklist available for all study deisgns?
CASP - critical appraisal skills programme checklist
what is the STROBE statement?
a checklist of items that should be included in any observational studies
what is the CONSORT statement?
a 25-item checklist and flow chart used to increase the completeness and transparency of reporting clinical trials, pub 2010
what is the PRISMA statement?
this is the 2015 checklist for the design and reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses
should be used by authors when writing their manuscript and by journal editors when deciding what to publish
what are the five elements of critial appraisal?
- what is the research question? (PICO)
- what is the design of the study?
- assess the study’s validity (detecing biases)
- assess the study’s results (statistical and clinical significance)
- assess the study’s generalisability and applicability