Criminal Psychology- Practical investigation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is EWT?

A

Evidence supplied by people who witness a specific event or crime, relying only on their memory.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why is it important for society to have accurate EWT?

A

Many criminal convictions are based on eye witness testimonies and so the answers given could convict people of crimes they did/ didn’t commit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

How would reconstructive memory explain distortion in memory?

A

It uses schemas that we rely on to help make sense of the world. Therefore we may assume things about a situation that aren’t true.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What did Loftus 1979 find in their study?

A

She staged a fake crime in a busy train station. Two students left a bag on a bench. While they were gone a male student pretended to pull out an object from the bag and place it under the his coat before walking away. The females then shouted that their tape recorder was missing. Eyewitnesses were asked “did you see the tape recorder?”. Although there was no tape recorder over half claimed that they saw one.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the aim?

A

Does post event information in the form of leading questions have an effect on memory recall

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the experimental hypothesis?

A

Memory recall will be significantly impaired with the presence of post event information in the form of leading questions compared to when non-leading questions are used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the null hypothesis?

A

There will be no significant difference in memory recall with the presence of post event information in the form of leading questions compared to when non-leading questions are used. Any difference will be due to chance.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the IV? How did you operationalise it?

A

Leading/non-leading questions. The leading questions contained information such as specific colours or items that were not included in the non-leading questions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the DV? How did you operationalise it?

A

The number of correct answers. We came up with a set list of correct answers to compare the participants answers to.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What design was used? Justify why.

A

Independent measures because it avoids order effects

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the sampling method?

A

Opportunity sample. We will ask whoever is around order to avoid participant variables.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How were participants allocated to different groups/conditions?

A

Randomisation- each person we came across did a different condition. e.g. Person 1 did condition 1, person 2 condition 2 and so on.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

List the apparatus used and why you needed it.

A

An image from google that contained sufficient detail to test memory recall. Two lists of questions to ask participants based on the image. Pen and paper to record answers. Stopwatch to time how long the participants are looking at the picture for.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which ethical guidelines did you follow?

A

We caused no distress as the picture of the restaurant was inoffensive, we debriefed each participant, we maintained the participants confidentiality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Give four extraneous variables and how they were controlled.

A

Time allowed- we timed each participant for 30 seconds using a stopwatch. Questions used- we came up with a set list of questions to ask so they were all worded in the same way. Size of image- each participant viewed the image on the same phone. Other people- each participant completed it by themselves without anyone else around them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Give some trends found from the raw data.

A

The control group score consistently higher than the experimental group. In the control group, all participants scored 4 or higher whereas in the experimental group only two participants scored 4 or above. The control group has a low standard deviation of 0.447 showing how the results were very similar in comparison to the experimental group where the standard deviation was 1.517.

17
Q

Which stats test did you use? Why?

A

We used a Mann-Whitney U test. Our data was interval however we couldn’t use an Independent T test as our data wasn’t normally distributed so we converted it to ordinal data. It was an independent measures test so we used a Mann Whitney U.

18
Q

Were the results significant? Explain

A

Our observed value is 9, the critical value is 4 and our significance level is 0.05. The observed value is greater than the critical value and so our results are not significant.

19
Q

Which hypothesis did you accept?

A

We accepted our null hypothesis. There will be no significant difference in memory recall with the presence of post event information in the form of leading questions compared to when non-leading questions are used. Any difference will be due to chance.

20
Q

What was your conclusion?

A

Overall, our results are not significant and shows no difference in the impact of leading questions on memory recall

21
Q

Evaluate the generalisability of the practical.

A

There was a narrow sample, only 16-18 year olds took part and they all went to King Edwards therefore it isn’t possible to generalise to other ages such as adults.
We had a small sample of only 5 in each condition which is not enough to represent a whole group.

22
Q

Evaluate the reliability of the practical.

A

There was a standardised procedure. We allowed the participants to view the picture for 30 seconds and then verbally asked the same questions.
However…….we split into two groups of researchers and one group asked a question differently to the other which may have led to a difference in results.

23
Q

Evaluate the applications of the practical.

A

Can help the police with official interviews. Research shows that leading questions can influence the behaviour and answers of eye witnesses which can help to get more accurate testimonies.

24
Q

Evaluate the validity of the practical.

A

It is low in mundane realism, being asked to look at a picture and then recall information about it isn’t reflective of real life situations and therefore can’t be applied to real life. High in ecological validity as the task was carried out in an everyday setting which means that the behaviour is less likely to be influenced by external factors. Internal validity was high as we controlled extraneous variables such as distractions.

25
Q

Evaluate the ethics of the practical.

A

We offered a full debrief after interviewing to explain what happened and gave the right to withdraw. We didn’t cause any distress.