Criminal Procedure Flashcards

1
Q

Constitutional Criminal Protections applicable to states

A

Through the 14th Amendment due process clause

Supreme Court has made a few rules: Miranda & Exclusionary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fourth Amendment

A

Right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures of person and property by the government

Applies when there has been a government intrusion in a constitutionally protected area or an area in which the defendant has a reasonable expectation of privacy

Government intrusion = police or citizens acting at request of police

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

A seizure is:

A
  • Based on totality of the circumstances
  • Reasonable person would not feel free to decline officer’s requests and terminate the encounter
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Arrest

A

An arrest is a seizure
- must be based on probable cause; trustworthy facts/knowledge sufficient for reasonable person to believe suspect has committed or is committing a crime for which an arrest is authorized

Public arrest = no warrant requirement

Arrest at home = warrant is required

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Probable Cause

A

Reasonable grounds to believe that a crime has been committed and that the arrestee has committed it

  • Hunch is NOT probable cause
  • If officer observes commission of crime = probable cause
  • When police officer makes a non-emergency arrest of person in OWN home –> arrest warrant required
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Terry Stops

A

If police have reasonable suspicion of criminal activity/involvement in a crime, supported by articulable facts they may detain a person in a reasonable manner for investigative purposes

Look for these magic words:
- Investigatory detention
- Reasonable suspicion
- Articulable facts
- Totality of circumstances

must be brief if goes longer, it will be an arrest

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Roadblocks

A
  1. Cars must be stopped on a neutral, articulable standard; and
  2. Be designed to serve purposes clearly related to a particular problem relating to automobiles and their mobility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Automobile Stops

A

Must have at least reasonable suspicion to believe law has been violated (even if other basis)

  • constitutes a seizure of any passengers as well
  • passengers have standing to raise wrongful stop
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Was search/seizure valid under 4th Amendment?

A
  1. Government conduct? - police and their agents
  2. Valid standing? - only if reasonable expectation of privacy
  3. Valid warrant?
  4. Any exceptions to warrant requirement?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Standing to raise 4th Amendment Violation

A

Reasonable expectation of privacy; determined by totality of circumstances

  • Places owned by person
  • Person’s home
  • Place where they are staying as overnight guest
  • Nonpublic areas in his place of business

No reasonable expectation of privacy in:
- things held out to public (voice/smell of luggage/car)
- open field
- garbage at curb
- someone else’s home/business/car/personal effects

*smells inside home are the only type of smell that is protected. by 4th amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Knock and Announce

A

Police generally must knock and announce authority

  • No knock entry permissible if officer has reasonable suspicion that knocking and announcing would be dangerous/inhibit investigation
  • Evidence not excluded based on violation of knock and announce
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Valid Warrant

A

Based on probable cause AND particularity; must describe with particularity the place to be search and items to be seized

  • Issued by neutral and detached magistrate
  • Invalid if based on material false statement that was intentionally/recklessly included
  • Police generally must knock and announce authority
  • Police entitled to look anywhere that item they’re looking for could reasonably be found (fact specific)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Search of Persons Found On Premises

A

Warrant to search for contraband authorizes police to detain occupants of the premises during a search, but not to search persons who were not named in the warrant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Exceptions to the Warrant Requirement - If any of these, evidence admissible even if warrantless search:

If not within these, then warrantless search is unconstitutional.

A
  1. Search incident to lawful arrest (contemporaneous)
  2. Automobile exception
  3. Plain View
  4. Consent
  5. Stop and Frisk
  6. Hot pursuit of fleeing felon (police within 15 minutes of felon)
  7. Evanescent Evidence
  8. Emergency Aid Exception
  9. Inventory searches incident to arrest
  10. Public school searches by school officials
  11. Mandatory drug testing
  12. Border searches

*4th amendment is not violated by a statute authorizing a warrantless search of a parolee’s home- even absent probable cause - if a statute provides for such searches! Parolee’s have diminished expectation of privacy and government has heightened interest in searching parolees homes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Automobile Exception

A
  1. Probable cause to believe vehicle contains contraband or fruits, instrumentalities, or evidence of a crime
  2. May search anywhere in/on car where item that is subject of search may be found
  3. Contemporaneous not required
    -can take and search later

*can arise after car is stopped, but MUST arise before arrest
*watch out for differences w/ “search incident to lawful arrest”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consent Entitles Warrantless Seizure when:

A

Someone with apparent right to use or occupy property consents

  • If suspect is present, can overrule
  • Parent usually has authority to consent to search of child’s room if parent has access to it
  • Consent can come from anyone with an apparent equal right to use/occupy the property
  • If co-occupant denies entry then police cannot come in

Examples:
Fraternity/Sorority House Example
- anyone who lives there can consent to areas they are entitled (not other person’s bedroom, unless has access)

Overnight Visitor
- consent is valid if it comes from anyone with APPARENT authority to give consent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Plain View Entitles Police to Make Warantless Seizure when:

A
  1. Police legitimately on premises
  2. Discover evidence, fruits, instrumentalities of contraband
  3. See evidence in plain view;
  4. Have probable cause to believe that the item is evidence, contraband, or a fruit/instrumentality of the crime

*Immediately Apparent Requirement: - police cannot manipulate item to determine if it’s contraband;
- has to be obvious upon immediately looking at it
Example: can’t turn over computer to verify serial #

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Stop and Frisk

A

During valid Terry stop, if police have reasonable belief that detainee is armed and dangerous; may pat down outer clothing for weapons and may seize anything that by plain feel is weapon/contraband

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Public school searches by school officials are valid if reasonable:

A
  1. offers moderate chance of finding evidence of wrongdoing;
  2. Implemented through means reasonably related to objectives of the search;
  3. Search not excessively intrusive
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Emergency Aid Exception

A

Police officer may enter premises without warrant if officer faces an emergency that threatens health/safety of individual or public

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Mandatory Drug Testing

A

Upheld when serves a special need beyond the needs of law enforcement

  • High school students in extracurriculars
  • Government employees with access to drugs
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Valid warrant may be authorized for wiretapping if:

A
  1. Probable cause
  2. Suspected persons in conversations to be heard are named
  3. Warrant describes with particularity conversations that can be overheard
  4. Wiretap limited to short period of time
  5. Wiretap terminated when desired information obtained
  6. Return made to court, showing what conversations have been intercepted
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Uninvited/Unreliable Ear

A

Speaker has NO fourth amendment claim if they make no attempt to keep convo private

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Violations of Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel

A

6th Amendment guarantees right to assistance of counsel in ALL criminal proceedings; all critical stages of prosecution after judicial proceedings have begun

*not applicable at pre-charge or investigative lineup

  • Offense specific: pertains to only one crime and defendant must ask again if charged with separate, unrelated crime
  • Waivable
  • Statement made in violation of 6th Amendment not admissible to prove guilt, but can be used to impeach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Involuntary Confession / Violation of 14th Amendment

A

For self-incriminating statement to be admissible under due process clause –> must be voluntary

  • Involuntary = official government compulsion
  • harmless error test applies if involuntary confession erroneously admitted into evidence
  • Totality of circumstances: age, education, setting, duration, abuse, etc.
  • Torture of any kind makes confession involuntary

*lying to the defendant “I want to help you” –> does NOT make the confession involuntary

*If confession is involuntary, cannot be used to impeach!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

5th Amendment Privilege Against Compelled Self-Incrimination = Miranda Warnings

A
  1. Right to remain silent
  2. Anything that is said may be used in court
  3. Right to an attorney
  4. If cannot afford attorney, will be appointed one
  • must be given prior to custodial interrogation by police (doesn’t apply to informant or probation officer)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Custody Requirement for Miranda Warnings

A
  1. Whether a reasonable person under the circumstances would feel they were free to terminate the interrogation and leave?
  2. Whether environment presents the same inherently coercive pressures as type of station house questioning?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Two Common Ways Police Violate Miranda

A
  1. Failing to give appropriate warnings at the appropriate time
    (before a custodial interrogation by police officer)
  2. Failing to follow applicable rules after warnings have been given
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Interrogation

A

Any police words or conduct designed to elicit an incriminating response

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Waiver of Miranda

A

Rights must be EXPLICITLY invoked

  1. Right to remain silent
  2. Right to counsel
31
Q

Waiving Right to Remain Silent

A
  1. Must be knowing and voluntary
  2. Judged under totality test
  3. If warnings given and defendant talked, then valid waiver
  4. If right claimed, request must be honored (cannot ask anything more)
  • explicit, unambiguous, unequivocal
  • allows police to reinitiate questioning when police wait significant amount of time and questions limited to a crime that was not subject to earlier questioning

Can continue questioning later for different reasons

32
Q

Waiving Right to Counsel

A
  1. Detainee unambiguously states wishes to speak to counsel
  2. All questioning must cease
  3. Defendant may voluntary reinitiate questioning

Duration against questioning = 14 days after defendant returns to normal life (normal life can mean life behind bars if Defendant is in prison)

MUST STOP ALL QUESTIONING

33
Q

Pretrial Identifications

A
  1. 6th Amendment right to counsel applies at any post-charge lineup or showup (not at photo identifications/fingerprints)
  2. Due process standard: unnecessarily suggestive identification procedures that give rise to a likelihood of misidentification violate due process
  3. Improper identifications excluded at trial
  4. If out of court identification excluded; in court identification allowed if from a source independent of the exlcuded identification
34
Q

Fruit of the Poisonous Tree Doctrine

A

All evidence derived from the excluded evidence will also be excluded

Balancing Test for Excluding Evidence under Fruit of Poisonous Tree:
no exclusion if deterrent effect on police misconduct is outweighed by the costs of excluding probative evidence

35
Q

Exclusionary Rule

A

Evidence obtained in violation of the defendants 4th, 5th, or 6th Amendment rights generally will be excluded to deter government violation of constitutional rights

36
Q

Exceptions to Fruit of Poisonous Tree Doctrine / Where Illegally Obtained Evidence Will NOT Be Excluded Under Exclusionary Rule

A
  1. Evidence admitted from independent source
  2. Attenuation - intervening act/circumstance (act of free will)
    Example: suspect returns to police station
  3. Inevitable discovery by police
  4. Live witness testimony
  5. In-court identification
  6. Violation of no knock
  7. Good faith reliance on defective search warrant
  8. Impeachment - illegally obtained evidence will apply to be able to show person is not telling the truth

Court IS HOLDING:
- Even if there was a 4th amendment violation, the defendant is not getting the benefit of excluding the evidence

37
Q

Exclusionary Rule Does NOT apply to:

A
  1. Grand juries
  2. Civil proceedings
  3. Violations of state law
  4. Violations of internal agency rules
  5. Proceedings to revoke parole
38
Q

Harmless Error Test Applies to Exclusionary Rule

A

If it would have resulted despite improper evidence –> conviction upheld

If error had substantial and injurious effect or influence –> petitioner should be released

39
Q

Preliminary Hearing

A
  1. Determines probable cause
  2. Not required if probable cause already found (grand jury/arrest warrant)
  3. Hearing must be within reasonable time - 48 hrs
40
Q

Initial Appearance

A
  1. Happens soon after arrest
  2. Defendant told of charges, bail set, appointment of counsel if need
41
Q

Bail

A

Most states: right to be released on bail unless capital charge

Can’t be set any higher than what is necessary to assure defendants appearance at trial

Excessive bail could be 8th amendment violation

42
Q

Grand Juries

A

5th Amendment right to grand jury trial is not incorporated into 14th amendment; some states require

Grand juries have:
- secret proceedings;
- broad subpoena power;
- no right to counsel/miranda warnings
- no right to warning that witness could be a potential defendant
- can include evidence that would be inadmissible at trial
- no right to challenge subpoena for lack of probable cause

43
Q

6th Amendment Right to Speedy Trial - Determining if it’s been violated

A

Judged under totality of circumstances:

  1. length of delay;
  2. reason for delay;
  3. whether defendant asserted rights;
  4. prejudice to defendant

Remedy: dismissal w/ prejudice
Right attaches on arrest/charging

44
Q

Prosecutorial Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Information/Defenses

A
  1. Govt. must disclose exculpatory evidence
  2. Failure = due process violation if reasonable probability trial result would have been different if undisclosed evidence had been presented at trial
45
Q

Competency to Stand Trial

A

At time of trial, D is not competent if:
1. Lacks rational and factual understanding of the charges and proceedings
2. Defendant lacks ability reasonably to consult with lawyer

*Trial judge has duty to raise if no one else does

*Burden to prove incompetency can be placed on defendant

*If D later regains competency –> can be tried/convicted

46
Q

Excessive Pretrial Publicity

A

May require change of venue/retrial

47
Q

Right to Trial by Jury

A

6th Amendment right to jury for serious offenses (imprisonment for more than 6 months)

  • Must be at least 6 (no constitutional right to 12)
  • Verdict must be unanimous
  • D has right to representative cross-section
48
Q

Representative cross-section

A

D only needs to show that the underrepresentation of distinct/numerically significant group in the venire (not petit jury) to show right to jury trial was violated

49
Q

Right to Public Trial

A
  1. 6th/14th Amendments provide right to public trial
  2. Probable cause hearings presumably open to public
  3. Suppression hearings open unless:
    - Party seeking closure has overriding interest
    - Closure is no broader than necessary
    - Other reasonable alternatives were considered
    - Court makes findings to support closure
50
Q

Peremptory Challenges

A
  1. Cannot be used in discriminatory manner;
  2. If D shoes facts/circumstanes raising inference of prejudice;
  3. Judge must determine prosecutor’s sincerity;
  4. Defendant similarly limited
51
Q

Right to Impartial Jury

A
  1. Right to question on racial prejudice if race inextricably bound up or D accused of interracial capital crime
  2. Allowed to ask jurors if they would automatically give death penalty upon guilty verdict;
    If answers affirmatively –> must be excluded if view would prevent/substanially impair duty
52
Q

Confrontation Clause: Right to Confront Witnesses

A

6th Amendment grants the defendant in a criminal prosecution the right to confront adverse witnesses

*right not absolute
*face to face not required

53
Q

Right to Counsel

A
  1. In misdemeanor cases, only available if imprisonment is actually imposed
  2. Waiver valid (can proceed pro se) if knowing and intelligent and D is competent
    - Voluntary/intelligent if D has a rational and factual understanding of the proceeding
54
Q

Effective Assistance of Counsel

A

Part of 6th Amendment Right to Counsel

  • Effective assistance is presumed
  • Ineffective if:
    1. deficient performance;
    2. but for deficiency, result of proceeding would have been different

*trial tactics are not ineffective assistance
*cannot be based on lack of time, lack of experience, gravity of charges, complexity of defenses, access to witnesses

*conflict of interest may be basis for removal / no joint representation

55
Q

Co-defendants confession as part of Confrontation Clause

A

Confession implicating co-defendant is prohibited UNLESS:

  • All portions referring to other D can be eliminated; or
  • Confessing D takes stand and subjects himself to cross-examination;
  • Confession of non-testifying co-defendant is being used to rebut the D’s claim that their confession was obtained coercively
56
Q

Prior Testimonial Statement of Unavailable Witness

A

Inadmissible unless:
- Declarant is unavailable;
- Defendant had opportunity to cross-examine declarant at time statement was made

57
Q

Testimonial Statements

A
  • statements from preliminary hearing
  • grand jury proceeding
  • former trial
  • police interrogation (unless police responding to ongoing emergency then not testimonial)
  • results from forensic labs (unless the person who did testing is available for cross-examination)
58
Q

Burden of Proof

A

Prosecution MUST prove beyond a reasonable doubt

  • mandatory presumption shifting burden to defendant violates 14th amendment due process

**affirmative defenses (insanity) allows state to place the burden of proof on D

59
Q

Taking a Guilty Plea

A
  1. Taking plea waives right to jury
  2. Judge must determine that plea is voluntary and intelligent
  3. Judge must address defendant personally on the record to ensure D knows:
    - Nature of charge and crucial elements
    - maximum possible charge and mandatory minimum
    - right not to plead guilty
    - by pleading guilty, D waives right to trial

*unfairly informed D not bound by the plea

*If Plea found to be intelligent choice –> D is NOT permitted to withdraw

60
Q

Bases for Collateral Attack on Guilty Plea

A
  1. Plea involuntary
  2. Court lacked jurisdiction to take plea
  3. Ineffective assistance of counsel
  4. Failure of prosecutor to keep plea bargain
61
Q

Right to Counsel Availability

A

Right to counsel during sentencing

NO constitutional right to appeal

62
Q

8th Amendment

A

Prohibits punishment that is cruel/unusual; punishment is grossly disporportionate to offense

63
Q

Death Penalty - Constitutional Rights

A
  1. Statutory scheme must give fact finder reasonable discretion, full information, and guidance in decision making
  2. Statute cannot be vague
  3. Application of death penalty:
  • For murder –> valid
  • For accomplice to felony murder –> valid if accomplice participated in a major way/acted with reckless disregard to value of human life
  • For rape –> disproportionate/invalid
  • If insane –> invalid
  • If intellectually disabled –> invalid
  • If younger than 18 when committed –> invalid
  1. Unconstitutional to make a status a crime
  2. Unconstitutional to sentence minor to life w/out parole for non-homicide crime
  3. Unconstitutional to provide harsher penalties than those demanding at trial
  4. Imprisonment of indigent for failure to pay fine violates equal protection
64
Q

Appeals

A
  1. No right to Appeal
  2. If right to appeal granted by state law, then right to counsel applies at first appeal
  3. No right of self-representation
  4. New rules announced on direct appeal must be applied to all other cases on direct appeal
65
Q

Habeus Corpus

A
  1. Civil action challenging lawfulness of detention
  2. Petitioner has burden to show unlawful detention by preponderance of evidence (burden shifts here)
  3. D must be “in custody” (bail/probation/parole)
66
Q

Double Jeapordy

A

5th Amendment Right Applicable to States Through 14th Amendment

  • D cannot be retried fro the same offense
67
Q

When does jeopardy attach

A
  1. Jury trial - when jury empaneled/sworn in
  2. Bench trial - when first witness sworn in
  3. Juvenile proceedings - at commencement of proceeding
68
Q

Exceptions permitting retrial

A
  1. Hung jury
  2. Mistrial for manifest necessity to abort original trial
  3. Retrial after successful appeal
    - cannot be for more serious crime than crime convicted in first trial
69
Q

Same Offense Requirement for Double Jeapordy

A

Blockburger Test: two crimes are NOT the same if each crime requires proof of an element the other does not require

  • charges by separate sovereigns are not prohibited
    *states municipalities are considered the same sovereign
70
Q

Privilege Against Self-Incrimination - 5th Amendment

A

Applies to states through 14th Amendment

  • Right for natural persons only (not corporations/partnerships)
  • Applies only to testimony;
    (not to physical evidence/documents)

Defendant can refuse to take stand altogether
- Prosecutor cannot comment on D’s silence after receiving Miranda warnings
UNLESS it’s a response to a claim of “no opportunity to explain”

*Witness other than D must take stand and invoke privilege question by question

71
Q

If Defendant Takes Stand

A

Waives 5th Amendment Privilege against self-incrimination to the extent necessary to subject them to cross examination

  • waives ONLY if they disclose incriminating information
72
Q

Search Incident to Lawful Arrest (Exception to Warrant Requirement)

A
  • Limited to D’s wingspan/area
  • Wingspan/area travels with the D
  • If police have reason to believe accomplice is present in the home, they can conduct a protective sweep of the home to look for accomplice
  • When arrestee was recently sitting in car –> police entitled to search passenger car if they reasonably believe evidence of the offense may be found in the vehicle

@ Common Law: police could arrest someone for “disorderly conduct”

73
Q
A