Criminal Practice Procedures Flashcards
What are two important rights once a suspect is detained by police?
Right to free, indp legal advice -> s.58 PACE 1984
Right to have someone informed of arrest -> s.56 PACE 1984
Explain the right to legal advice (HARI)
s.58
suspect must be offered free, indp legal advice
decision must be recorded in custody record
police cannot say or do anything to dissuade suspect (Code C)
delay: only for indictable offences, up to 36 hours & superintendent must approve only if advice would interfere with evidence or witness, harm to person, alerting other suspects, or hindering recovering of property
Explain the right to have someone informed
s.56 PACE 1984
suspect is entitled to request a friend or relative to be told ASAP about arrest and detainment
delay: must be indictable, up to 36 hours only and approved by inspector (3rd rank)
only if informing would interfere with evidence or witness, harm to person, alerting other suspects, or hindering recovering of property
How is a identification parade held? what are the requirements?
- witness must be shown a line of 8 people plus suspect resembling age, height, general appearance.
- police should replicate unusual feature or conceal if not possible
- witness shouldn’t communicate with other witnesses
- witness shouldn’t see any parade member before or see suspect before or after
- witness should be informed that the suspect may or may not be in the lineup
How is a video identification held? Who must conduct and what are the requirements?
- witness is shown videos of 8 other people resembling suspect
- Foils must resemble suspect in age, general appearance
- police should conceal or replicate unusual features
- witness shouldn’t communicate with other witnesses
- only 1 witness must be shown the videos at a time
- must be conducted by inspector (rank 3), not involved in investigation & formal record must be prepared
Explain the benefits and disadvantages of exercising right to silence
Pros:
Weak case: if the case is weak & esp if client intends to plead guilty, they should remain silent.
Unpredictable S: if S is immature or unpredictable, they may say something incriminating or attack another person’s character which can lead to bad character evidence.
Written statement: if S is unpredictable, they can hand in a written statement at the start of the interview explaining defence to prevent adverse inferences.
Cons:
Not guilty: if client intends to rely on anything they didn’t explain in interview, court can draw adverse inferences.
When can sol intervene in interview? What can they not do?
To clarify question, challenge improper conduct or advise the client not to reply/ give further advice
Unacceptable conduct: answering q’s on behalf of C or writing answers for C to read out
If officer is prevented from reasonably conducting interview, sol can be excluded if superintendent authorises this. S should be allowed to get another sol.
What is the right to have an appropriate adult? What is the AA’s role?
- Who can be an AA:
- A parent, social worker, or other responsible adult.
Must not be:
- Involved in the investigation.
- Someone to whom the juvenile (J) has confessed.
- If J is estranged from a parent and objects to their presence, that parent should not be chosen.
- Role of the AA:
- Ensure J understands what is happening and why.
- Assist with communication between J and the police.
- Ensure proper police conduct.
- Must not give legal advice.
- Conversations with the AA are not legally privileged.
- When an AA must be present:
- During interviews.
- When giving a caution.
- When signing a written statement.
- Removal of an AA:
- If the AA prevents the interview from being conducted properly, they may be removed by a superintendent.
- A replacement AA should then be found.
What is the procedure for bail?
- CPS objects to bail & provides previous convictions & grounds to defence & applies to court for remand in custody
- CPS argues grounds
- Defence argues grounds
- Defence may call witnesses
- Magistrates’ decision
If bail is granted, the CPS may appeal to the Crown Court under the Bail (Prosecution Appeals) Act 1997.
If custody is ordered, the defence may:
- Make one further full bail application to the same court (magistrates), unless there is a material change in circumstances (where you can make further bail applications to same court).
- Or apply to the Crown Court for bail, but this is a fresh application, not an appeal You don’t have to show a “change in circumstances”, but it helps to present new arguments or supporting material if you can.
- Even after two refusals by Magistrates, the defendant is still able to make a fresh application to the Crown Court.
What happens when D absconds?
If the defendant absconds (fails to surrender to custody):
- The court can issue a warrant for arrest.
The CPS or police may charge (formally accuse) D with a criminal offence under s.6 Bail Act 1976 if:
- D failed to surrender without reasonable cause, or
- Had reasonable cause but delayed surrender without good reason.
- This offence can lead to prosecution, fine, or imprisonment (up to 3 months in the Magistrates’ Court).
If the defendant breaches bail conditions (e.g. curfew, contact ban):
- This is not a criminal offence.
However, under s.7 Bail Act 1976:
- The police may arrest D without a warrant.
The court may:
- Revoke bail,
- Impose stricter conditions, or
- Remand D in custody.
- No separate charge arises just from breaching bail conditions.
What happens when D breaches bail condition?
Not a criminal offence but Mag will decide if there was a good reason for breach and remand in custody or bail
How do you apply for a representation order?
Magistrates representation order CRM14 form:
satisfy:
Interests of justice
Means test
Crown: need to contribue and capital is assessed in means
What can be included in interests of justice test (9)?
- Loss of liberty → likely custodial sentence
- Loss of livelihood → conviction will lead to losing job
- Serious Reputation Damage → D has no prior conviction but has standing of respect due to job or position (vicar, school governor)
- Substantial Question of Law → Disputed identification evidence, adverse inferences from ss34, 36-37 CJPOA 1994, hearsay, exclusion of confession, bad character evidence
- Vulnerable: may not be able to understand/present my case due to disability, no English,
- Need to trace a witness: legal rep is required to trace or interview a witness
- Cross-examination needed (for question of law): legal rep is needed to carry out cross examination for exclusion of confession, hearsay, bad character, visual evidence dispute
- Someone else’s interests to be represented: ie D cannot cross-examine witness (eg SA victim or child)
- Any other reason: eg if D would receive demanding community sentence, D is going to enter not guilty plea for serious charge
What is the means test?
automatically satisfied if on universal credit, minor, income support, jobseekers allowance
full means test:
disposable income ie income minus tax, NI, housing allowance, living allowance, childcare = under £22,325
crown court:
disposable income & capital is under £37,500 -> D might have to contribute
What’s the procedure for a summary offence?
Procedure for Summary-Only Offence
- First Appearance – Magistrates’ Court
- Defendant attends Magistrates’ Court.
Court deals with:
- Confirming identity,
- Bail,
- Legal aid,
- Disclosure and case management.
- Plea
Defendant is asked to enter a plea.
🔹 If Guilty:
- Magistrates proceed to sentence (may adjourn for reports).
🔹 If Not Guilty (or no plea entered):
- Case is listed for summary trial in the Magistrates’ Court.
- Pre-Trial Hearing
- Case progression steps are taken:
- Prosecution and defence disclose evidence,
- Witness availability confirmed,
- Legal issues (e.g. admissibility) addressed if needed.
- Trial
- Takes place in the Magistrates’ Court before a bench of magistrates or a District Judge.
- Magistrates determine guilt or innocence.
- Sentencing
- If convicted, the defendant is sentenced by the Magistrates’ Court.
What’s the procedure for a Either Way Offence?
Procedure for Either-Way Offence
- First Appearance in Magistrates’ Court
- Charges are read.
- Legal aid, bail, and case management may be addressed.
- Plea Before Venue (PBV)
- Defendant asked to enter a plea.
🔹 If Guilty:
Magistrates decide if they have sufficient sentencing powers.
- If yes → Sentence in Magistrates’ Court.
- If no → Case sent to Crown Court for sentencing.
🔹 If Not Guilty (or no plea):
- Move to Mode Of trial hearing.
- Mode Of Trial Hearing
- Magistrates decide if case is suitable for summary trial.
If suitable:
Defendant asked if they consent to summary trial.
- If yes → Trial in Magistrates’ Court.
- If no → Case sent to Crown Court.
- If not suitable → Case automatically sent to Crown Court.
- Trial or Sentencing
- Trial takes place in the chosen/allocated court.
- If convicted, sentence is passed in that court.
What’s the procedure for a indictable offence?
Procedure for Indictable-Only Offence
- First Appearance – Magistrates’ Court
- Defendant appears before the Magistrates’ Court.
Court deals with:
- Confirming identity,
- Bail,
- Legal aid,
- Case management issues.
No plea is taken on the offence itself (as it’s indictable-only).
- Sending to Crown Court – s.51 Crime and Disorder Act 1998
- Case is automatically sent to the Crown Court — no allocation or election process.
- This must happen immediately, unless there’s a reason to delay (e.g. linked summary offences).
- Crown Court – Plea and Trial Preparation Hearing (PTPH)
Defendant enters a plea.
If guilty:
- Court proceeds to sentence (may adjourn for reports).
If not guilty:
- The case is timetabled for trial.
- Directions for disclosure, evidence, and deadlines are set.
- Trial or Sentencing
- Takes place in the Crown Court before a judge and jury (for trial),
- Or before a judge alone (for sentencing if guilty plea).
What is the procedure when a defendant enters their plea?
Q: What is the procedure when a defendant enters their plea in the Magistrates’ Court?
A:
- The CPS must serve the Initial Details of the Prosecution Case (IDPC) before the hearing.
- The legal advisor reads out the charge, confirms IDPC was served, and asks the defendant to indicate their plea.
- If the defendant pleads guilty:
- The magistrates decide whether to sentence the defendant themselves or commit to the Crown Court for sentencing if their sentencing powers (max 12 months) are insufficient.
- If the defendant pleads not guilty to an either-way offence:
- A mode of trial hearing is held to decide if the magistrates will accept jurisdiction.
- If they retain the case, the defendant may still elect trial in the Crown Court.
- If the magistrates decline jurisdiction, the case is sent to the Crown Court for trial.
What are the pros of trial in the magistrate’s court
- Limited sentencing powers: Max 6 months for a single either-way offence, or 12 months total.
- Faster resolution: Trials proceed quicker, lowering stress—particularly beneficial if the defendant is remanded in custody.
- Lower cost: Legal and prosecution costs are lower; defendants are less likely to contribute under legal aid rules.
- Less intimidating and less formal: More relaxed environment; suitable for anxious or vulnerable clients.
- No obligation to file a defence statement: Unlike Crown Court, no requirement to outline defence strategy in advance.
- Less publicity: Media coverage is usually minimal.
- No jury risk: Some clients may prefer professional decision-makers over unpredictable juries.
What are the cons of trial in the Magistrates’ Court (5)?
- No jury trial: Magistrates or District Judge decide facts; no right to be tried by peers.
- Higher conviction rate: Magistrates convict more often than juries.
- Less experienced adjudicators: Lay magistrates may lack legal training, though guided by legal adviser.
- Admissibility decisions may be prejudicial: Magistrates decide both law and fact; risk of prejudice if they hear inadmissible evidence and still decide the facts.
Note: Some courts now use different benches for pre-trial admissibility decisions to limit this issue.
- Lower sentencing powers could be misleading: Magistrates can still commit for sentencing if they feel powers are insufficient after conviction.
What are the pros of trial in the crown court
* Higher acquittal rates: Jury trials statistically have better outcomes for defendants.
* Juries are more sympathetic: Juries may be more sympathetic, especially where local magistrates often deal with the same police witnesses.
Fairer procedures for admissibility of evidence: Judge decides in a voir dire (mini-trial without the jury), which avoids prejudicing the jury with inadmissible material.
* More preparation time: Crown Court cases take longer to come to trial, giving time to prepare defence and line up witnesses.
* Greater pressure on CPS to comply with disclosure obligations.
What are the cons of trial in the crown court
* Higher sentencing powers: Judges can impose significantly longer custodial sentences.
* Slower and more formal process: Can be intimidating and cause prolonged stress for the defendant.
* Higher costs: Legal and prosecution costs increase; legal aid often requires means testing and contributions.
* Defence statement required: Must disclose the nature of the defence and any facts in issue, which may limit flexibility later.
What is the venue allocation procedure when a defendant pleads not guilty to an either-way offence under ss. 19–20 Magistrates’ Courts Act 1980?
- The defendant pleads not guilty or gives no indication of plea to an either-way offence.
- A mode of trial hearing is held under s.19 MCA 1980.
- The magistrates decide whether the case is suitable for summary trial or should be sent to the Crown Court.
- The court considers:
- The nature and seriousness of the offence
- The maximum aggregate sentence for all related offences
- Any legal or factual complexity
- Whether the offence is linked to indictable-only offences
- The magistrates explain their decision to the defendant.
- If magistrates accept jurisdiction, the defendant has the right to elect trial in the Crown Court under s.20 MCA 1980.
Q: What is ‘sending without allocation’ under s.50A Crime and Disorder Act 1998?
Under s.50A CDA 1998, magistrates can send an either-way offence (EWO) directly to the Crown Court without holding a mode of trial hearing if certain conditions are met.
- The court does not conduct the usual venue allocation procedure.
- Instead, it automatically sends the case to the Crown Court where the EWO is connected to a more serious case or situation.
This applies if:
- The offence is related to an indictable-only offence being sent to the Crown Court.
- The defendant is charged alongside a co-defendant (adult or juvenile) whose case is going to the Crown Court.
- The court has been notified that the case involves:
- Serious or complex fraud, or
- Serious sexual offences or child abuse cases.