Criminal law part.2 Flashcards

1
Q

Define Jurisdiction

A

the legal authority of a court to decide legal cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Define original jurisdiction

A

the power of a court to hear cases for the first time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Appellate Jurisdiction

A

the power of court to hear a case on appeal
-not a ‘‘re-hearing’’
-no jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are 2 examples of specialisation

A

Magistrates cour:
-hears summary offences + Indic. heard summarily -> matters need to be dealt with quickly and efficiently
-committal proceedings
-can hear warrants and bail
County Court:
-hears indictable offences - not homicide generally eg. robbery
-judge develop expertise in those matters including elements of each crime and jury matters
-jusge hears appeals from the magistrate on leniency and severity of sentencing/ conviction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are 2 examples of appeals

A

County court:
-from magistrates art on conviction o sentence
Supreme Court (trail division)
-from magistrate on point of law

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are 2 strengths of a court hierarchy

A

-allows courts to specialise in different trim. matters -> allows more efficient process/ resources based on case (eg. magi= summary)
- existence of C.H allows appeals made by both parties if error in original decision

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of a court hierarchy

A
  • different courts can be confusing to ppl who don’t know crime process. esp. ppl charged of Indic. -> case involves both magi and a higher court
    -not allow for an auto. right to appeal -> most offenders = establish grounds for appeal. Restrict ability to access appeal system -> particularly self-representing ppl, may struggle with formulation for a grounds to an appeal
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the role of the judge and 3 other specific roles

A

Is to act as a referee, to oversee the case to make sure that court procedures are followed and that the parties are treated fairly.
-Act impartially: should be unbiased, cannot be invested in the outcome of the case, shouldn’t have apprehended biases- not bringing an impartial mind
-Manage trial: court procedures are followed by both parties and have the same opportunity to present their case, det. admissibility of evidence
-Sentencing the offender: if found guilty by jury/ plead guilty- parties will submit for sentencing, follow the sentencing act 1991 (vic)- legislation, must factor in aggravating, mitigating + V.I.S = ensure fairness through protocol

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What are 2 strengths of the judge

A

-impartial umpire- oversee trial w/o overly interfering, so no party is advantaged or disadvantaged
- judges= manage the hearing processes ensuring that rules of evidence and procedure are followed, both parties have the same opportunity to present their case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of the judge

A

-Judges are human so there is a risk that they will have actual or apprehended bias that impacts their decision making eg. when fatigued
- can’t overly interfere with the case including those who are self-representing , even though the judge is the most experienced in the room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the role of the jury and 3 other specific roles

A

jury members must be impartial and base their decision on the evidence presented whilst applying the law in an independent manner
-Be objective: put any prejudices aside, have no connection with the case
- Listen and remember evidence: can take notes, concentrate on info, not conduct personal research or own investigation
-Deliver a verdict: deliberate and participate with the other jurors , form an opinion/ verdict, reach unanimous verdict for murder, treason, man. verdict for other indictable offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are 2 strengths of the jury

A
  • Jury is randomly picked, no connection to the parties, make decisions on facts, not biases
    -Juries represent a cross-section of the community, made of a diverse group, which can lead to the decision reflecting the values of society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of the jury

A

-Jury members may have unconscious biases/ prejudices, they don’t have to give a reason for their decisions= no way of knowing if bias played a role in decision
-Jury trials may have further delays as rules, evidence and processes needed to be explained to the jury, and a jury may require some time to deliberate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the role of the prosecution

A

Is to represent the state (vic) and bring the accused to court to answer for their crime and seek justice for the victim/s
-Participate in the trial: presenting an opening address outline charges and the issues and the evidence that will be presented/ closing address, presenting evidence that supports their case incl. examination chief, lay witness, expert witness, cross examination
- Submissions regarding sentencing: inform court about any relevant matters about offence or the offender relevant to sentencing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the role of the accused-

A

Is to present their ‘side’ of the case with support from their legal represntation
- Participate in trail: remain silent, do not have to say anything, present defence, opening address, present evidence and support statements to support themselves, cross-examination
- Make submissions regarding sentencing: once guilty offender= entitled to make submissions about sentencing, present rel. evi aiming to get a lighter sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are 2 strengths of the parties

A

-both parties have the opportunity to present their case
-accused has no obligation to present evidence or do anything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of the parties

A
  • process involved are complex, difficult to understand without a lawyer
  • Party control, right to silence may mean that the truth doesn’t come out, may feel unjust for victims and their families
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Define Barrister

A

these are lawyers that are specifically trained to present the case at trial. They will stand up and address the judge/ jury, present evi, outline the facts of the case and examine witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Define Soliciter

A

These are lawyers involved in preparing the case, they will locate documents, liaise with police, obtain copies of evi, prepare witness for trial, provide the barrister w instructions for trial.
-tend to be first lawyer that Indiv. may see for evidence, much of their work is ‘desk based’ rather than the courtroom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What legislation protects a court order for legal representation

A

Criminal Procedures Act (2009)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What are 3 reasons for legal practitioners in the courtroom

A

-Draft documents and letters for clients: freq. comm with client and gather needed info, prov. legal advice and ensure relevant documentation is organised, readily available for duration of proceedings (eg. photos and reports of evi)
-Researching the law + presenting evidence: gather relevant info, conduct interviews w witnesses (lay and expert), review documents and scrutinise previous legal decisions (eg. finding precedent to sup. case)
-Making evidence submissions: Pros and accused person’s barrister will make submissions to the judge as to whether certain evidence should or shouldn’t be put b4 jury

22
Q

What are 2 weaknesses of legal practitioners

A

-Some accused cannot afford legal rep. but also don’t qualify for legal rep grants thus forced to self-rep
-s+b= very expensive to hire experience, meaning that if the accused doesn’t have one then they are poorly informed

23
Q

What are 2 strengths for legal practitioners

A
  • use of practitioner can improve accused chance of securing a not guilty verdict, as case is presented in the best light by expert
    -Legal practitioners help parties be informed, prepare and present their case, increasing access to justice
24
Q

What are 3 examples of cost factors

A

-obtaining legal advice:solicited fees
-Witness fees: payments made to expert witnesses to challenge witness statements
-Cost to appeal: fees to file an appealing hiring potentially more experienced legal representation to present arguments for an appeal

25
Q

What are 2 ways that cost factors can be addressed

A

-Plea negotiation: allows accused to discuss with prosecution a plea to lesser or fewer charges
-Committal Procedures: indictable offences allow weaker cases to be filtered out, promotes an early guilty plea to resolve that matter faster, decrease the legal costs for the accused

26
Q

What are 3 examples of time factors

A

-court backlogs
-trail procedures including pre-trial procedures
-the collection of evidence to put together a convicing case

27
Q

What are 2 ways in which time factors are addressed

A

-Plea negotiations: allow accused to plea guilty early, no trial-> straight to sentencing, allow for more efficient resolution of disputes
-Use of technology: digital tech means that accused can attend the hearing remotely and can also attend while still in remand, only available for parties appearing in the magistrate court

28
Q

What are 3 examples of cultural factors

A

-each party is responsible for organising and preparing their own case: ‘‘party control’’
-all procedures are conducted in English
-The pre-trail process and the process I complex and full of jargonistic legal terminology

29
Q

What are 2 ways in which cultural factors are addressed

A

-The use of the Koori court: aiming to provide culturally relevant sentencing that is more effective to reduce re-offending, crim. division of mag., sentencing court
-Interpreters: available for all accused, onus to pay and arrange interpreter is on courts as opposed to the accused. Allows for all non-english speakers to understand crime. procedures better w/o paying expenses

30
Q

What is the legislation that protects sentencing

A

Sentencing Act 1991 (vic)

31
Q

What is the explanation of rehabilitation

A

It aims to provide a cure or a framework of support for the offender and can be embedded within sanctions
-Examples of cause: lack of work, drug and alcohol addiction
-Examples of strategies: attending edu. classes whilst serving a prison sentence to increase skills, attending therapies

32
Q

What is the explanation of protection

A

to ensure that the offender doesn’t pose a significant risk to the welfare and safety of their victims and broader society
-For Example: CCO’ and imprisonment

33
Q

What is the explanation of punishment

A

to inflict pain/ loss or an inconvenience to ensure the offender is penalised proportionally and held accountable for their actions. It should take into consideration the impact of their crime on victims, their families, the nature of the offence and society

34
Q

What is the explanation of deterrence - general and specific

A

the act of discouraging an offender or other individual from re-offending or committing similar crimes through criminal sanctions
-General: targets the community, by seeing the sanctions that the offender got and hopefully discouraging others from committing the same action
-Specific: targets the offender and attempts to discourage them from re-offending

35
Q

What is the explanation of denunciation

A

publicly condemn an offenders behaviour to show the disapproval of society.
-This can occur during a judge statement at the end of the hearing or trial. Highlight the extent to which the offender violated the moral and ethical standards of society

36
Q

What it the definition of fines

A

a sanction that requires the offender to make a monetary payment as a penalty for a criminal offence

37
Q

When can fines be imposed

A

When the judge deems it appropriate to pay a monetary amount in place of a CCO or imprisonment
- 1 pu= $192.31

38
Q

What are 3 ways in which fines can achieve their purposes

A

-specific deterrence and general
-punish to certain extent (link to context of Q- does financial punishment really punish eg. mansion owner= not greatly affected)
-small denouncement though imposing a sanction

39
Q

What are 3 ways which fines don’t achieve their purposed

A
  • overall denouncement due to fines being able to be kept secret
    -protection-offender= still in the community
  • rehabilitation- doesn’t address the original cause for the offending to ‘cure’ the offender= less reoffending
40
Q

What is the definition of a CCO

A

a NON-CUSTODIAL order by the court that allows the offender to remain within the community with certain conditions attached. A CCO can be imposed alongside a fine or imprisonment to be served after the release of the offender

41
Q

When can CCO’s be imposed and the conditions of a CCO

A

When the offender is punishable by 5 or more pu eg. posting posters, wilful damage to property
When the judge believes that a fine alone is not appropriate
The offender has agreed tp a CCO
Conditions- completing 600hr of community service (up to 20hrs per week) such as ‘money for jam’, abiding by curfew, ankle monitoring, medical treatment or rehab. programs for drug/ alcohol addiction, avoiding contact with a particular person, no consumption of alcohol

42
Q

What are 3 ways in which CCO’s achieve their purposes

A

-Partially protect if avoiding contact with an individual is specified
-Rehabilitate- specialised programs in place for this spec to cure the root of the problem of the offending
-Denouncement- public knowledge of a person getting a CCO

43
Q

What are 3 ways in which CCO’s don’t achieve their purposes

A

-Fully protect the community due to them still being in the community
-General deterrence- specific tasks not common knowledge to the public, not feel so serious as a loss of something
-limited punishment due to offender still being able to have almost full freedoms, ability to get a job and be in the community

44
Q

What is the definition of imprisonment

A

a sanction that removes an offender from the community and places them in prison for a given period of time

45
Q

When can they be imposed and the conditions associated

A

When the judge deems it appropriate for the offender to be sentenced to a term in prison
conditions- loss of personal freedoms, inability to see family outside of visitation hrs, loss of income/ job prospects, programs within prison that aim to address causes for offending eg. counselling, drug programs, can learn Tafe skills

46
Q

Definition of parole

A

the early release of a prisoner after their minimum term served which is subject to supervision and certain conditions

47
Q

Definition of cumulative sentence

A

a sentence of imprisonment or detention that is served one after the other eg sentence for the 2nd offence begins after the completion of the first one

48
Q

Definition of concurrent sentence

A

a sentence of imprisonment or detention that is served at t he same time as another when the offender is convicted of more than one crime eg 3yrs imprisonment for all the offences that they were charged with

49
Q

What are 3 ways in which imprisonment achieves their purposes

A

-punishment- through a lack of freedoms
-specific deterrence- offender may not want to reoffend to avoid going to prison again
-protect- by removing them from the community

50
Q

What are ways in which imprisonment does not achieve their purposes

A

-rehabilitation- few programs in place that are loosely targeting the offence
that the offender committed