Criminal Law- Murder Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What act governs murder

A

The homicide act 1957

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Who defined murder

A

Sir Edward Coke 1797

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What act abolished the ‘year and day’ part of the murder definition

A

The Law Reform Act 1996

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

LP of Attorney General 1997

A

Transferred malice was not applicable as the transferee had to be in existence at the time when the D formed mental intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the MR for murder

A

To kill or cause GBH

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Mohan 1975 LP

A

It defines intention as ‘as a decision to bring about the prohibited consequence, whether the accused desired that consequence or not.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Bryne 1960

A

Direct intention

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Woollin 1998

A

Indirect intent is based on the D at the time of the offence believing that death was virtually certain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is direct intent

A

Wanting death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is indirect intent

A

Where the D may not want to cause death, but death could certainly happen because of their acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Causation is established using what 2 stage test?

A
  • Factual causation (but for test)

- Legal causation (thin skull rule or the Operating and Substantial cause test)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v White 1910

A

Causation must be proved in a murder case. The prosecution must establish a link between the D’s acts or omission and the death of the victim.

But for the Ds action would the death have occurred.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does legal causation examine?

A

The action of the D and whether it contributed to the death of the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What does the thin skull rule mean

A

The accused must take the victim as the accused finds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Thin skull rule key case example

A

R v Blaue 1975

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Legal causation key case

A

R v Pagett 1983

17
Q

R v Pagett 1983 LP

A

It was held that the D’s act need not to be the sole cause, or even the main cause, of death provided it is a cause in that it ‘contributed significantly to that result’

18
Q

R v Jordan 1956

A

A new intervening act can break the chain of causation.

19
Q

What are the 3 categories of interning acts?

A

1) Acts of the victim
2) Acts of third parties
3) Medical intervention

20
Q

1) Acts of the victim- key case and LP

A

R v Roberts 1972- the chain of causation will be broken only if the victims’s actions were ‘so daft’ as to be unforeseeable

21
Q

2) Acts of third parties- key case

A

R v Pagett 1983

22
Q

3) medical intervention- key case

A

R v Jordan 1956 and Cheshire 1991