Criminal Law & Criminal Procedure Flashcards
Merger doctrine
Conspiracy, solicitation, and attempt merge into the completed offense.
Conspiracy merges into attempt.
Merger – felony murder
If D has committed several felonies and it is unclear which is the underlying felony for felony murder, the trial court must merge with the felony murder the most severe felony.
Where D kills while committed a felony and is found guilty of (1) felony; (2) murder based on malice aforethought; and (3) felony murder, then the merger does not apply. D will be sentenced for both the felony and the malice murder.
Inference of intent from act
A person is not presumed to act with criminal intention, but such intention may be inferred upon consideration of the words, conduct, and other circumstances associated with the act for which the defendant is prosecuted.
Accomplice liability
Anyone concerned in the commission of a crime is a party to the crime and may be charged with and convicted of the crime.
Approval, not amounting to encouragement, or presence at the crime scene will not be sufficient.
Solicitation
D commits solicitation when, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony, he solicits, requests, commands, or otherwise attempts to cause the other to engage in such conduct.
Conspiracy
D commits conspiracy when (1) he, together with at least one other person, conspires to commit any crime and (2) any one of such persons commits an overt act to bring about the object of the conspiracy.
Conspiracy – defense
Withdrawal: a co-conspirator will be relieved of criminal liability for the conspiracy if, before the occurrence of the overt act, he withdrew his agreement to commit a crime.
Attempt
Criminal attempt consists of (1) intent to commit a specific crime; and (2) the performance of an act that constitutes a substantial step toward the commission of that crime.
Attempt –defenses
Impossibility is not a defense
Abandonment: D abandoned his effort to commit the crime or in some other way prevented its commission under circumstances showing a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal purpose. Belief that circumstances render completion more difficult or decision to postpone do not constitute renunciation.
Insanity defense
Two bases:
(1) if at the time of the crime, D did not have mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong
(2) if at the time of the crime, because of mental disease, injury, or congenital deficiency, D acted as she did because of a delusional compulsion that mastered her will to resist committing the crime
Intoxication defense
Voluntary intoxication is not a defense unless D can show that the intoxication resulted in more than a temporary alteration of brain function such that D could not form the requisite intent
Involuntary intoxication is a defense if it deprived D of sufficient mental capacity to distinguish between right and wrong in relation to the criminal act.
Infancy defense
Anyone younger than 13 years old cannot be found guilty of a crime
Self-defense –non-deadly force
A person is justified in threatening or using force when and to the extent she reasonably believes it to be necessary to defend herself or a third person against the other’s imminent use of unlawful force
Self-defense –deadly force
Justified only if D reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent the death or great bodily harm to herself or another, or to prevent the commission of a forcible felony.
If uses an unlawful weapon in using deadly force, D loses immunity (e.g., sawed off shotgun).
Duty to retreat
No duty to retreat and can stand his ground when force is authorized.
Self-defense –first-aggressor
Use of force is not justified if D (1) initially provokes the use of force intending to use it as an excuse to inflict bodily harm; (2) is attempting to commit, is committing, or is fleeing after committing a felony; or (3) was the aggressor or engaged in combat by agreement, unless he withdraws and communicates intent to withdraw.
Defense of dwelling
Deadly force can be used to protect D’s home when (1) entry is made or attempted in violent manner and D reasonably believes that entry is being made to commit an assault or other violent crime within; (2) deadly force is used against another who is not a household member and who unlawfully and forcefully entered the home and D believed that unlawful or forcible entry occurred; or (3) D reasonably believes that entry is made or attempted for the purpose of committing a felony therein and force is necessary to prevent the felony.
Defense of property
Non-deadly force is justified to the extent it is reasonably believed necessary to prevent or terminate a trespass or wrongful interference with real property other than a habitation or personal property other than a motor vehicle, provided the property is in (1) D’s possession; (2) possession of D’s immediate family; or (3) possession of someone D has a duty to protect.
Deadly force is not permitted unless D reasonably believes it necessary to prevent a forcible felony against a person.