Criminal Law Flashcards
**felony murder crimes (ie most common felonies)
BARRK (Burglary, Arson, Rape, Robbery, and Kidnapping)
‘dangerous felonies’ = felony-murder
**which are the specific intent crimes?
FIAT (car, intent to drive)
First-degree murder
Inchoate crimes (conspiracy, attempt, solicitation)
Assault w/ attempt to commit battery
Theft offenses (larceny, embezzlement, forgery, burglary, robbery)
MPC: statute with “purposely”
Defenses available only for specific-intent crimes
voluntary intoxication, unreasonable mistake of fact
**Malice crimes
malice = reckless disregard (tossing dud fireworks into grill, even if u didnt intend them to catch house on fire)
arson, murder
MAlice
I AM certain
arson, murder
Common Law
specific intent (FIAT), general intent (just intent to do an act), or strict liability?
“with intent to…” =
“knowingly or recklessly” =
no Mens Rea language =
“with intent to…” = specific intent crime
“knowingly or recklessly” = general intent crime
no Mens Rea language = strict liability
MPC hierarchy of mental states
Party of Korean
1) Purpose—highest level of culpability (specific intent)
2) Knowledge
3) Recklessness
4) Negligence—lowest level of culpability
inchoate crimes
inChoATe crimes
CATS = conspiracy, attempt, solicitation
MPC conspiracy differences
MPC requires overt act, but needs only 1 person to agree (helps law enforcement go undercover)
robbery = __ + __
larceny + assault (IF - force/intimidation when taking it from the person/presence)
Rob = LA
for felony-murder, the robbery/etc. [can / cannot] have only been attempted
can
battery [does / does not] merger into robbery
does
does common law require burning of the dwelling?
yes
Common-law burglary
the breaking and entering of the dwelling of another in the nighttime with the specific intent to commit a felony
**attorney gained possession of the necklace through fraud [lied to client that atty was required to hold it] with the intent to sell it. which crime was committed?
larceny by trick: through fraud, obtains possession but NOT title. so if you gain possession AND title, then it’s NOT larceny by trick
**false pretenses requires obtaining __ of the property by fraud
title (“it’s literally yours now”)
A defendant who fails to commit the underlying felony [can / cannot] be guilty of burglary + attempt to commit the underlying felon
can :O
burglary = breaking/entering at night w/ intent to commit felony (eg larceny)
but attempted larceny (attempt = substantial step) + burglary (merely the INTENT to commit the larceny once you enter, not necessarily a substantial step) is okay
factual impossibility [is / is not] a defense to the crime of attempt
is not
A mistake of fact [is / is not] a defense to a specific-intent crime, even if the mistake is unreasonable, because it negates the element of mens rea
is. “I legit thought it was a safe plant, NOT ricin - so I did NOT intend to kill my parents even though I did - so can’t be guilty of first-degree murder”
voluntary manslaughter
V(ictoria) = heat of passion + MA (malice aforethought)
involuntary manslaughter
IN -> NEG
not intentional but criminal NEGLIGENCE - unintentional homicide committed with criminal negligence or during an unlawful act (eg assault)
(grossly negligent action that puts another person at a significant risk of serious bodily injury or death)
assisted suicide
the dead person committed the act itself
does common law murder include reckless disregard for human life?
yes, that’s malice, depraved heart
common law murder = unlawful killing + malice aforethought. “Malice aforethought” includes reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life.
conspiracy
AI (artificial intelligence conspiracies)
agreement + specific intent to commit target offense
solicitation
reach out + command/encourage