Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

An individual is criminally liable as an accomplice if:

A

he gives assistance or encouragement, or fails to act where he has a legal duty to oppose the crime of another, and purposefully intends to effectuate commission of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

A defendant is responsible for the criminal acts of another whom he aided, abetted, or facilitated, provided the criminal consequences are:

A

reasonably foreseeable in terms of the acts the defendant intended to aid or abet.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Define Arson.

A

At common law, the crime of arson consists of –
the malicious burning of the dwelling of another.

Burning requirement–
Mere blackening of the surface is not enough, there must be some physical damage by fire (not smoke or heat) of the premises itself.

Additionally, mere burning of the furniture or other contents of the dwelling without fire damage to the structure itself is not arson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define Burglary.

A

Burglary consists of the breaking and entering of the dwelling house of another in the nighttime with the intent to commit a felony within.

Entry is achieved by placing any portion of the body or any instrument inside the structure.

Breaking and entering must both be done without the occupant’s consent and only some force to create an opening

Defendant must have necessary intent at the time of entry and need not carry out the intent to be guilty.

Modern statutes often expand places covered, eliminate need for breaking, eliminate nighttime requirement and expand intent.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Define the majority rule for Defense of a Third Person.

A

The majority rule focuses on the reasonableness of the defendant’s belief that the third party was being unlawfully attacked. If the third person is also the aggressor or a felon resisting lawful arrest, and the defendant reasonably but mistakenly uses lethal force against the victim to protect that third party, the defendant may nonetheless claim the justification of defense of others.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Reasonable non-deadly force is justified in defending one’s property from theft, destruction, or trespass where:

A

the defendant has a reasonable belief that the property is in immediate danger and no greater force than necessary is used.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Define the defense of Duress.

A

The defense of duress excuses criminal conduct where the defendant reasonably believes that the only way to avoid unlawful threats of great bodily harm or imminent death to himself or a third party is to engage in unlawful conduct.

*Not a defense to a crime consisting of an intentional killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Define Embezzlement.

A

The fraudulent conversion or misappropriation of the property of another by one who is already in lawful possession with intent to defraud.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Embezzlement involves misappropriation by a defendant who has:

A

lawful possession (extensive and discretionary).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Defense of Entrapment (Majority Rule).

A

Entrapment exists where the criminal act is the product of creative activity originating from law enforcement officials, and the defendant is in no way predisposed to commit the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Defense of Entrapment (Minority Rule).

A

Entrapment occurs if police activity would cause a reasonable and unpredisposed person to form the intent to commit the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

M’Naghten Rule: Defendant is entitled to acquittal only if the facts show that at the time of the crime:

A

he had a serious mental disease or defect;
this caused a defect in his reasoning abilities; and as a result he did not either:
— understand the nature of the act he was doing; or
— understand that his act was wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intent to kill, malice, or intent to inflict serious bodily injury, must be proved by examination of:

A

all the surrounding circumstances, including the words and behavior of the defendant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Intoxication is involuntary if either:

A

defendant did not know substance was intoxicating; or defendant consumed substance under duress.

Note: apply insanity test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Elements of Kidnapping.

A

Either:
—Confining or restraining a person; or
—Moving (asporting) a person; and
Without authority of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define Larceny.

A

Larceny was defined as:

  • – trespassory taking (exercise of control adverse to owner);
  • – asportation (some movement);
  • – corporal personal property of another;
  • – from the possession of another;
  • – wrongfully - either:
    a) without permission; or
    b) with permission; or obtained by deception (larceny by trick) and;
  • – with intent to permanently (at the time of the taking).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Larceny notes:

A

The intent to keep, destroy, or hold property for ransom will suffice to prove intent to permanently deprive (permanent loss).

If, at the time of taking, the defendant intends to return the property to the victim unconditionally and within a reasonable time, there is no intent to permanently deprive.

Title does not control for larceny.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Forming the intent after the taking and during the possession is sufficient only if (for larceny):

A
  • – the original taking was wrongful
    1. ) without consent; or
    2. ) with consent obtained by deception
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

A private citizen is privileged to use that amount of non-deadly force that reasonably appears necessary to:

A

prevent the commission of a felony or a misdemeanor amounting to a breach of the peace.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

A private citizen may use the same amount of deadly force as a police officer only if:

A

a dangerous felony is involved and the person against whom he used the force is actually guilty of the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Define Obtaining Property by False Pretenses.

A

Obtaining property by false pretenses consists of a false representation of a present or past material fact by the defendant, which causes the victim to pass title to his property to the defendant who knows his representation to be false.

The defendant must know that his representation is false at the time the victim transfers title to him, and intends thereby to defraud the victim.

Must convey title.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Define Rape.

A

Rape is the act of unlawful sexual intercourse by a male person with a female person not his spouse without the woman’s effective consent and by force.

Fraud will render woman’s consent ineffective only if the fraud goes to the nature of the act

Note that intercourse accomplished by mere threats rather than force may also constitute rape.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

If the victim is incapable of consenting, the intercourse is rape. Inability to consent may be caused by:

A

the effect of drugs or intoxicating substances or by unconsciousness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Define Receiving Stolen Property.

A

The receiving (taking possession) of stolen property known to be stolen with the intent to permanently deprive the owner.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

For receiving stolen property the defendant must either know or actually believe that:

A

the property is stolen. An honest but unreasonable belief that the property is not stolen would likely prevent a conviction for receiving stolen property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Define Robbery.

A

Robbery is defined as larceny in which
— the taking of the property must be from the person or presence of the victim and the taking must be accomplished by force, intimidation, threat, or violence.

Fear and intimidation based on lies qualify as threats of robbery. The use of force must be contemporaneous with the taking (in other words, all part of one occurrence).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

If a person has a reasonable belief that he is in imminent danger of unlawful bodily harm, he may use that amount of force in self defense that is:

A

reasonably necessary to prevent such harm, unless he is the initial aggressor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

An aggressor is one who strikes the first blow or commits a crime against the victim. The aggressor can regain the right of self-defense in either of two ways:

A

upon complete withdrawal perceived by the other party; or

escalation of force by the victim of the initial aggression.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Proximate causation exists if:

A

the voctoms death ntuarral

30
Q

When the defendant’s actions alone cause the harm, the defendant’s act is:

A

the direct cause. It is very likely that the defendant will be held legally responsible.

31
Q

To relieve the defendant of liability and thus, in effect, break the chain of proximate cause, the other force must be:

A

a superseding intervening cause.

32
Q

A superseding factor must be:

A

independent of the defendant’s actions;
unforeseeable; and
the sole immediate cause of the victim’s death.

33
Q

Define the crime of Attempt.

A

To commit a criminal attempt, a person must:

  • – do something constituting a substantial step towards commission of the crime;
  • – with intent to commit the crime
34
Q

For attempt, a two-part intent must be proved:

A

intent to complete the conduct constituting the attempted crime; and any intent necessary for the attempted crime

35
Q

Legal impossibility is traditionally regarded as a defense to attempt and involves the situation where:

A

the defendant did all those things he intended to do, but his acts did not constitute a crime.

36
Q

Murder is defined as:

A

a killing with “malice aforethought” if the defendant acted with:
intent to kill; or
intent to cause serious bodily injury; or
awareness of extremely high risk that death will result; or intent to commit felony (felony murder).

37
Q

The actus reus may be any of the three following:

A
  • – a voluntary act,
  • – an involuntary act arising from a voluntary act (such as an epileptic driving a car), or
  • – an omission to act where there is a legal duty to act.
38
Q

For murder, the act must cause the death of another living person both:

A

actually and proximately.

39
Q

In some jurisdictions, to persuade or aid another to commit suicide is:

A

a sufficient basis for murder.

40
Q

If an intervening cause kills the victim before the defendant can complete his act, he will be:

A

acquitted of homicide.

41
Q

In omission situations, people who fail to prevent injury or death are generally not criminally liable for the victim’s condition, unless:

A

they have a duty to act; and
the defendant as aware of the facts giving rise to the duty to act; and
performing the duty was possible.

42
Q

Define mens reas or intent.

A
  • Purpose: a conscious desire
  • Knowledge: awareness of a practical certainty
  • Recklessness: awareness of a substantial risk
  • Negligence: reasonable person would have been aware of a substantial risk
43
Q

Define Conspiracy.

A

The crime of conspiracy is the unlawful entering into a agreement to commit a crime ; and
with the specific intent to commit an unlawful act or a lawful act by unlawful means.

44
Q

Co-conspirator Rule: All members of a criminal conspiracy are guilty of crimes committed by other members of that conspiracy if those crimes are both:

A

— committed in the furtherance of the scheme; and

a foreseeable result of the scheme.

45
Q

Withdrawal is no defense for:

A

the crime of conspiracy and is only a defense to a crime which the defendant is liable under the co-conspirator rule.

46
Q

For a withdrawal to be effective, it must be:

A

— timely notice and fully communicated to all other members of the conspiracy; and
performs an affirmative act to “thwart” the success of the conspiracy (or for other members to abandon).

47
Q

Define Felony-Murder.

A

Felony-murder is an unintentional killing proximately caused during the commission or attempted commission of a serious or inherently dangerous felony.

48
Q

Accidental deaths during the commission of a felony:

A

are murder.

49
Q

A death during a felony may be:

A

must have been foreseeable; or

to have been dangerous as committed.

50
Q

All co-felons are guilty of felony murder if:

A

the death was foreseeable to them.

51
Q

Define Involuntary Manslaughter.

A

Involuntary manslaughter is an unintentional killing resulting:
— in the course of committing a misdemeanor; or
with criminal negligence.

52
Q

Define Criminal Negligence.

A

Criminal negligence requires that the defendant’s conduct creates a high degree of risk of death or serious injury beyond the tort standard of ordinary negligence.

53
Q

Define First-Degree Murder:

A

First-degree murder includes intent-to-kill murder committed with premeditation and deliberation, felony-murder, and in some jurisdictions, murder accomplished by lying in wait, poison, terrorism, or torture.

54
Q

Define Second-Degree Murder:

A

Second-degree murder is any murder that does not meet the requisite elements of first-degree murder, for example, where the defendant’s mens rea is intent to inflict serious bodily injury;

55
Q

Define Solicitation.

A

Solicitation consists of:

  • – Enticing, advising, inciting, inducing, urging, or otherwise encouraging another to commit a felony or misdemeanor;
  • – With intent that the person commit that offense

One who solicits another to commit a crime cannot be convicted of both the solicitation and the completed offense.

56
Q

Define Voluntary Manslaughter.

A

Voluntary manslaughter is an intentional killing mitigated by objectively reasonable provocation;
that actually caused the defendant to kill the victim; and defendant acted before an objectively sufficient cooling period elapsed.

57
Q

Adequate provocation, measured objectively, must be such that:

A

a reasonable person would lose self-control.

58
Q

Imperfect self-defense may mitigate murder to voluntary manslaughter where a defendant was either:

A

at fault in starting an altercation, or unreasonably, but honestly, believed that harm was imminent or that deadly force was necessary.

59
Q

Intent to return or replace converted property:

A

does not show the lack of the intent to defraud required for embezzlement.

60
Q

Under false pretenses an insufficient misrepresentation means:

A
  • – unkept promise; or

- – misrepresentation of a future fact

61
Q

An affirmative misrepresentation is required but:

A

failure to correct a misunderstanding is sufficient of the defendant creates the misunderstanding.

62
Q

Where the victim of a crime such as robbery or rape is confined or moved during the crime:

A

kidnapping does not occur unless the confinement or movement is not merely incidental but increases the risk to the victim; or
makes successful completion of the crime more likely.

63
Q

Possession by actual physical control must involve:

A

more than momentary control.

64
Q

Constructive possession requires:

A

the ability to exercise actual physical control;
with awareness of that ability;
for a period sufficient to enable the person to terminate the possession

65
Q

A participant in an offense is not guilty of the offense if either:

A
the participant is a member of the class of persons protected  by the crime (ex. statutory rape); or
the crime inherently involves several types of participants and only some are made liable.
66
Q

Factual impossibility is not a defense to an attempt and exists:

A

when a person’s intended end constitutes a crime, but she fails to consummate the offense because of an attendant circumstance unknown to her or beyond her control

67
Q

Ignorance or mistake concerning a matter of fact will affect criminal liability only if:

A

it shows defendant lacked the intent required for the crime; and the mistake was objectively reasonable.

68
Q

Specific intent crimes:

A

are any offense defined as doing something “with the intent to…”

69
Q

Ignorance or mistake concerning a matter of law is a defense if:

A

that belief was objectively reasonable; and
the defendant relied upon a statute later held invalid;
a judicial decision later overruled; or
an official interpretation of the law by a public official.

70
Q

M’Naghten Approach.

A

1) Assume the situation was as the defendant perceived it
2) Ask under those circumstances, would he have been legally entitled to do what he did?

If so, but only if so, he is entitled to acquittal.

71
Q

Under voluntary intoxication a defendant should be acquitted if the crime requires:

A

proof of specific intent and the intoxication shows he lacked the intent.

Note: There is no voluntary intoxication defense if recklessness is sufficient for liability.

72
Q

Criminal assault is either:

A

(i) an attempt to commit a battery OR (ii) the intentional creation - other than mere words - of a reasonable apprehension in the mind of imminent bodily harm