Criminal Law Flashcards
criminal law
body of rules by which state prohibits certain forms of conduct because it harms or threatens public safety and welfare that imposes punishment for commission of such acts
ultima ratio
imposition of criminal punishment should be very last resort
sword and shield
crime control function that represents the power to punish and take away freedom
safeguard function that shows how this punishment can only take place within boundaries of criminal law
deterrence theory
individual deterrence (punishing in order to prevent recidivism)
general detterence (using threat to discourage people from committing crimes)
rehabilitation theory
to prevent future crime by giving offenders the necessary treatment and training that enables them to
offender can be released under certain conditions
retributive theory
offenders are punished because they deserve to be
intrinsic link between punishment and guilt
punishment should match the crime that has been committed
Structure of a crime
actus reus -> objective element of crime
mens rea -> subjective element of crime
“actus non facit reum nini mens sit rea” = an act does not make a man guilty unless his mind is also guilty
Intention
Intention -> cognitive part & volitional part both required
Direct intent -> strong volitional element where consequence of intention is desired
Indirect intent -> strong cognitive aspect where agent is aware of consequence but still chooses to commit crime even tough it’s not their aim
Intent is what needs to be done to achieve a goal
Recklessness Common Law
denotes the conscious taking of unjustified risk
-> agent is aware of a risk but unreasonable to take ->event of acceptance is not needed
Construction worker dugs a hole, is aware of the risk but doesn’t believe someone will fall
negligence
culpa, most normative form of mens rea -> based on violation of the required duty of care which caused a result prohibited by criminal law
unconsciuos negligence -> agent wrongfully doesn’t consider consequences of conduct -> agent unconscious of risk but should and could have been aware
conscious negligence -> agent is aware of risk but assumes that result won’t occur
necessary defense
- imminent & unlawful act -> defendent can’t wait any longer for official authorities to protect his interest
- only as long as danger is ongoing
- defense must pertain to legitimate interest
- defense must be a capable and necessary means
- weighing interests of aggressor against defendants
“He who commits an act which is required as necessary defense is not acting unlawfully.”
“Necessary defense is the defense which is required in order to fight off an imminent unlawful assault from oneself or another.”
insanity = excuse
- attributable to a mental disorder: defendant suffering from relevant mental disorder
- mental disorder has substantially impaired defendant’s capacities to be held responsible
- are there any other reasons attributing to mental disorder prior to event?
diminished capacity
where defendant’s capacities have been weakened by disorder but not to an extent of legal irresponsibility