CRIMINAL LAW Flashcards
What is for the Jury to decide when assessing whethera defendant satisfies the actus reus of attempted robbery?
The jury must decide, as a question of fact, whether what the defendant has done is sufficient for the offence of attempted robbery.
is intention to cause grievous bodily harm enough to satisfy a conviction of attempted muder?
no.
Intention to cause grievous bodily harm is not sufficient.
- D must intend to kill
If there is a virtual certainty that someone might die from an act created by the D, does this satisfy a charge of attempted murder?
Yes.
its an indirect intention to kill
What are the 3 types of parties to a crime?
- Principal offender
- Joint principals or (co principals)
- Secondary party (accomplice/accessory)
What are the 4 ways in which actus reus is satisfied by an accomplice?
- Aiding
- Abetting
- Counselling
- Procuring
S 8 of the Accessories and Abettors Act 1861
What must an accomplice do for the principle offender when they ‘aid’
Help / assist
Before or during offence
What must an accomplice do for the principle offender when they ‘abet’
Encourage
During offence
What must an accomplice do for the principle offender when they ‘counsel’
Instigate / solicit / encourage
Before offence
What must an accomplice do for the principle offender when they ‘procure’
Produce my endeavour
Before offence
In cases of procurement do you need to prove that there is a mental link between principal and accomplice?
No. No need to establish contact between the two.
Yes for : aiding, abetting, counselling
Which is the only element of actus reus to accessory / accomplice that requires a causal link?
Procurement
What two actus reus elements require a mental link ?
Abetting
Counselling
Can someone who just witnessed a crime without intervening be an accomplice?
No. It’s a moral obligation, not legal
Can you be an accomplice to murder if you got involved after the murder took place?
No.
What are the two situations that can arise when the principal isn’t convicted but the accomplice is?
- Principal has a defence
- Principal cannot be found
Note: actus reus must occur before accomplice can be held liable
What is an innocent agent?
Someone who commits AR of crime but isn’t guilty of offence because they lack MR
If an accomplice/accessory uses an innocent agent to commit a crime how will they be charged?
The will be charged as the principal offender
What is the Mens Rea for accomplice liability (two limb test)
1st limb: A must intend to do act or say the words
2nd limb: A must have knowledge of circumstances - mainly facts that make PO’s conduct criminal.
Might not have knowledge of the specific offence but;
- knows type of crime
- range of crimes that might be committed
What is vital to withdrawing participation to a crime before the offence?
Communication
Must be unequivocal and timely
Are words likely to be enough when withdrawing participation to a crime, during the crime?
No. Physical prevention may be needed