Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the main function of criminal law?

A

To prohibit and punish certain behaviours that harm or threaten public safety and welfare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Ultima ratio

A

The principle that punishment should be the last resort, since it limits individuals’ freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

SWORD AND SHIELD function

A

Criminal law limits and controls governmental power but also human’s freedom

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Principle of Individual Autonomy

A

Holds that citizens should be free from undue State powers
–> Making their own decisions and control their own fate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Principle of Welfare

A

Gives weight to certain collective goals and interests that warrant protection by CL

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The Harm Principle

A

The idea that limiting citizen’s freedom through governmental power should only be justified when the consequences of not doing so would mean harm to others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Legal moralism -> Counter part to harm principle

A

What do we consider harmful?
Reliance on morality is subjective

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Utilitarian theory on legal punishment. Main thesis

A

Punishment can only be justified if the harm that it prevents outweighs the harm it creates through the offender

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Major rationales (3)

A
  1. Individual Deterrence: Avoid repetitiveness of crimes
  2. General Deterrence: Avoid general population committing crimes
  3. Rehabilitation: Necessary treatment to turn them into active members of society
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Retributive Theories. Main thesis

A

Punishment is justifiable just on the basis of the punishment being called for. Offenders deserve punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The Actus Reus - Mens rea Dichotomy

A

The idea that all crimes can be split into these two concepts. The objective and the subjective element of a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Bipartitite Structure of a crime. Definition and complications

A

Assessing liability only needs mens rea and actus reus. Fails to account for justifications and excuses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Tripartitite structure of a crime. Stages and complications

A

Assessing liability in 3 stages:
1. Mens rea and actus reus
2. Wrongdoing
3. Blameworthiness

–> IN ORDER

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

ACTUS REUS. What two types of actus reus can be mentioned?

A
  1. Offense by commission
  2. Offense by omission
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Offense by commission. How is action analyzed/ seen? Does it have complications

A

Action as superficial toward manifestation = movement of the limbs

Fails to account for offenses not committed by humans (orgs., corporations…)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Offense by ommission. The Absence of action. What entales?

A

Violation of a DUTY OF CARE

17
Q

MENS REA. What 3 aspects can we distinct in the analysis?

A
  1. Intention
  2. Negligence
  3. Recklesness (english law)
18
Q

INTENTION. What are the 2 elements?

A

Cognitive part: What is thought
Volitive part: What is wanted

19
Q

Into what 3 types of intention can be adhere to each element?

A
  1. Direct intent (volitive)
  2. Indirect intent (cognitive)
  3. Conditional intent
20
Q

Direct intent. How big is the degree of volition? Definition.

A

Strong level of volition, where the CONSEQUENCE of an intention is acually desired

21
Q

Indirect intent. How big is the degree of cognition? Definition

A

Strong level of cognition. The perpetrator knows his conduct will ALMOST CERTAINLY bring about the result, which he does not actually desire or AIM at.

22
Q

Conditional intent. Defintion and levels of volition and cognition

A

An actor does not want to kill a person but merely injure them
–> CONSCIOUS ACCEPTANCE OF A RISK
- Cognition: Is aware of risk
- Volition: Accepting possibility that risk will materialize

23
Q

NEGLIGENCE. Definiton

A

Based on the violation of a duty of care.

24
Q

Two types of negligence

A
  1. Conscious negligence
  2. Unconcious negligence
25
Q

Conscious negligence

A

Agent is conscious of a risk, but assumes IT WILL NOT OCCUR

26
Q

Unconscious negligence

A

Agent is not conscious of the risk, he wrongfully does not consider the risks of his actions or the absence of his actions

27
Q

What two aspects can possibily take away the criminal liability of a person?

A

Justifications and excuses

28
Q

Give an example for each.

A

Justification -> Self-defense
Excuse -> Insanity

29
Q

Justification: Self-defense. What are the requirements to claim that (3)?

A
  1. Imminence: Can’t wait until the authorities come
  2. Proportionality: Self-defense must be in proportion to danger that might be suffered
  3. Capable and sufficient defense: Must be enough to repel the attack

–> IF HELP IS AN OPTION ONE SHOULD USE IT

30
Q

Excuse: Insanity. What are the requirements?

A

Guarantees that those who are not responsible for actions are not punishable.

  1. Offense attributed to mental disorder: Impaired the defendant’s capacities to be held responsible
  2. Mentally disordered at the time of the act