Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is felony murder? How does merger relate?

A

Felony murder is an unintended killing proximately caused by and that occurs during the commission or attempted commission of an inherently dangerous felony (e.g., robbery). The underlying felony, as the lesser included offense, typically merges into the felony-murder charge.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Can you be convicted of robbery and assault for the same crime?

A

Nope. Robbery is larceny from the victim’s person or presence by force (battery) or intimidation (assault). Since larceny and battery/assault are lesser included offenses to robbery, they merge into the completed robbery. Therefore, the defendant may only be convicted of robbery—not its constituent offenses.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Is it still burglary if you break into a house to steal something but can’t find it and end up stealing nothing>

A

Yes. Common law burglary is complete when the defendant unlawfully breaks and enters a dwelling at night with the intent to commit a felony therein. Commission of the underlying felony is unnecessary. However, a burglary defendant who fails to complete the underlying felony is also guilty of the attempted commission of that felony.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

When is a person who finds lost property guilty of larceny?

A

A person who finds lost or misplaced property is guilty of larceny if, at the time of the finding, the person (1) knows or believes he/she can locate the owner and (2) takes and carries away the property with the intent to steal it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

In common law, if you ask an undercover cop to kill your husband, are you guilty of solicitation or conspiracy or both?

A

Just solicitation.

Common law conspiracy requires proof of at least two guilty minds, so a defendant cannot be convicted of conspiracy if the other alleged conspirator(s) feigned agreement. Additionally, solicitation is complete upon the encouragement of the crime—it does not matter if the other person agrees to or can commit the solicited crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Under the MPC, if you plan a crime with an undercover cop, are you guilty of conspiracy?

A

Yes.

Under the MPC, conspiracy requires that (1) the defendant enter into an agreement to commit a crime, (2) the defendant specifically intend that the crime be committed, and (3) at least one conspirator commit an overt act. Since the MPC follows the unilateral approach, only one party need actually agree to the conspiracy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

If you go into a bank to rob it, and pass a handwritten threat, but the teller doesn’t see it and you change your mind and run out, are you guilty of attempted robbery?

A

Yes.

A defendant is guilty of attempt if he/she (1) had the specific intent to commit a crime and (2) took a substantial step toward the commission of that crime. The crime of attempt is complete once the defendant takes the substantial step, so there can be no abandonment or withdrawal after that step is taken.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If you try to poison someone but accidentally use something harmless, are you guilty of attempted murder?

A

Yes.

Attempt occurs when a person (1) takes a substantial step toward the commission of a crime (2) with the specific intent to commit the crime. Factual impossibility is never a defense to attempt. This is NOT MISTAKE OF FACT.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Can police go into a third party’s home if police know someone they have an arrest warrant for is inside?

A

Nope.

An arrest warrant implicitly authorizes entry into the arrestee’s home—not a third party’s home—to serve the warrant. Police may only search for an arrestee in a third party’s home if they have a warrant for the search, exigent circumstances, or consent to enter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What’s the automobile exception to the warrant requirement?

A

The automobile exception to the warrant requirement allows police to conduct a warrantless search of a vehicle if they have probable cause to believe it contains evidence of a crime. Officers can search any area within the vehicle where the evidence might be located, including the trunk and locked containers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Exceptions to warrant requirement

A

Exceptions to warrant requirement

Search incident to arrest
Administrative search
Stop and frisk
Plain view
Automobile exception
Consent
Exigent circumstance
Special government purpose

Mnemonic: SAD SPACES

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What can be used against a non-Mirandized suspect’s incriminating statement during a custodial interrogation?

A

A suspect’s incriminating statement during a custodial interrogation without Miranda warnings cannot be used against the suspect at a subsequent trial. However, physical evidence obtained as a result of the non-Mirandized statement is admissible so long as that statement was not coerced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does Aprendi mean for a jury recommending a capital punishment?

A

Due process requires that any fact (e.g., aggravating circumstances) that exposes a criminal defendant to a greater punishment than authorized by the jury’s guilty verdict is an element that must be submitted to and decided by the jury.

The due process clause guarantees a criminal defendant’s right to have an impartial jury determine whether the defendant is guilty of every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt. Accordingly, the U.S. Supreme Court held in Apprendi v. New Jersey that any fact that exposes a criminal defendant to a greater punishment than authorized by the jury’s guilty verdict is an element that must be submitted to and found by the jury.

This holding has been applied to state capital-murder sentencing schemes that require a finding of at least one aggravating circumstance at either the guilt or penalty phase before the death penalty can be imposed. Therefore, a capital-sentencing scheme (as seen here) violates Apprendi if it:

allows a jury to render an advisory sentence recommending the death penalty without specifically finding an aggravating circumstance and

permits the judge to then make that finding independently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does an anonymous tip give you probable cause?

A

NO, and it is not sufficient for a valid warrant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Can police use a drug-sniffing dog on the porch of a suspect’s house?

A

NO. It’s curtilage and you can’t search that without a warrant. Police have an implied license to briefly enter a person’s curtilage in the same manner as a private individual. But if police intrude in an unusual manner for an uncommon purpose (e.g., to conduct a canine search), a warrant is generally required.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does a witness in a grand jury have a constitutional right to have her attorney present?

A

NO. A grand jury witness may consult with an attorney outside the grand jury room, but there is no constitutional right to have counsel present inside the grand jury room. Additionally, there is no constitutional right to present witnesses at a grand jury proceeding.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

If you confess before Mirandaized, and then after Miranda warnings confess again, does the first violation mean your 2nd confession doesn’t count?

A

NO. A Miranda violation does not automatically require the suppression of the defendant’s later confession made after the receipt of Miranda warnings. Instead, admissibility turns on whether the later confession was voluntary based on the totality of the circumstances.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Does an undercover cop in a jail cell with a perp need to do miranda rights before perp’s confession is admissible?

A

NO. Miranda warnings are not required when a suspect who is subjected to a custodial interrogation is not aware that the interrogator is a police officer—i.e., when the officer is undercover.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

When can the police search a car without a warrant if the person is already arrested?

A

Police may conduct a warrantless search incident to arrest when a person has been lawfully arrested and the search is limited to the person’s body and areas within the person’s immediate reach. The vehicle may also be searched it is reasonable to believe that evidence of the crime may be found therein.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

At common law, can a conspirator be convicted of conspiracy if all other coconspirators are acquitted at the same trial?

A

No. But can be if they had different trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When can an initial aggressor claim self-defense?

A

An initial aggressor can claim self-defense only if (1) the aggressor’s use of nondeadly force was met with deadly force or (2) the aggressor, in good faith, completely withdrew from the altercation and communicated that fact to the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

If you enter a store during business hours to steal 2 mugs, and hide them under your shirt and leave, and don’t realize every customer got 2 mugs for free that day, what’s the most serious crime you’ve committed?

A

Attempted larceny.

Burglary requires proof that a person unlawfully entered a building, so a person cannot burglarize a building by entering an area that is open to the public at the time. And larceny requires a trespassory taking, so a person cannot commit larceny by taking property freely given by another—even if the person was unaware of this fact. However, this factually impossibility would not absolve the person of attempted larceny.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Is factual impossibility a defense to attempt?

A

NO.

A defendant is guilty of an attempted crime if he/she (1) had the specific intent to commit a crime, (2) performed an act in furtherance of that crime, but (3) did not complete it. Factual impossibility is no defense to attempt.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

In VA law, felony murder constitutes

A

first-degree murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

In a first degree murder involving juvenile aged 16 or 17, who decides what court it goes to?

A

In a first-degree murder case involving a juvenile who was 16 years of age or older at the time of the offense, if the Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court finds probable cause, the case must be certified to the Circuit Court for trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

A motion to set aside the verdict must be made no later than _____________________ days after the final order of conviction.

A

21.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

VA: define felony murder

A

Felony murder is murder of the first degree and is defined as a murder committed in the commission or attempted commission of arson, rape, forcible sodomy, inanimate or animate object sexual penetration, robbery, burglary, or abduction (kidnapping) except as otherwise provided in the aggravated murder statute. Felony murder may be intentional or accidental, as long as the death results from acts in furtherance of one of the enumerated felonies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

VA: define robbery

A

Robbery is a common-law crime in Virginia. The elements of the crime as defined at common law are: (i) the taking, (ii) with intent to steal, (iii) of the personal property of another, (iv) from his person or in his presence, (v) against his will, (vi) by violence or intimidation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Explain a principal in the 1st degree and a principal in the 2nd degree.

A

A principal in the first degree is the person whose acts or omissions are the actus reus of the crime. Typically, a principal in the first degree is present at the scene of the crime. A principal in the second degree is a person who is present at the commission of the crime and shares the principal in the first degree’s intent that the crime be committed or aids, abets, encourages, assists, or advises a principal in the first degree in the commission of the crime. In felony cases, every principal in the second degree may be indicted, tried, convicted, and punished in the same manner as a principal in the first degree.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Can an accidental killing during a robbery constitute felony murder? For the principal in the second degree?

A

Yes and yes.

Even an accidental killing that results from the commission of a robbery can form the basis of felony murder.c

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

VA: define conspiracy

A

A person is guilty of conspiracy if he confederates or agrees with another to commit a felony. Virginia does not require an overt act to be performed to complete a conspiracy; an agreement to commit a felony is sufficient.

Although a defendant who has been tried and convicted of a substantive offense cannot be tried for conspiracy to commit that same offense at a later trial, a defendant who has been tried and convicted of an offense he conspired to commit can be convicted of both the substantive offense and the underlying conspiracy in the same trial.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

VA: Can a lawyer lie to the court?

A

No. a lawyer shall not make a false statement of fact or law to a tribunal (Rule 3.3).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

VA: Can a lawyer thwart the opposing party’s legally proper discovery request?

A

No. A lawyer shall not make a frivolous discovery request or fail to make reasonably diligent efforts to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party (Rule 3.4).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

VA: When can a plaintiff file for a nonsuit?

A

A plaintiff has the right to take a first nonsuit at any time before (i) a motion to strike the evidence has been sustained, (ii) the jury retires from the bar to decide the case, or (iii) the action has been submitted to the court for decision.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

VA: May the court impose sanctions for a lawyer’s failure to comply with a discovery order?

A

Under the Virginia Supreme Court rules (Rule 4:12), the court may impose sanctions for a party’s the failure to comply with a discovery order. When the party has failed to attend his own deposition, serve answers to interrogatories, or respond to a request for production or inspection, the court may impose certain sanctions, including striking the pleadings but not contempt, without the prior entry of an order to compel these discovery actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

VA: When may a court impose sanctions?

A

Virginia’s sanction statute (Va. Code Ann. 8.01-271.1) grants a court the authority to impose appropriate sanctions on any violation of this statute’s requirements whether the violation is brought to the court’s attention through a motion or the court acts on its own initiative. The statute provides that the attorney who represents a party (or a party who is proceeding pro se), by filing a pleading or making a motion, whether in writing or orally, certifies that:

i) He has read the pleading, motion, or other paper;

ii) To the best of his knowledge, information, and belief, formed after reasonable inquiry, it is well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law or a good faith argument for the extension, modification, or reversal of existing law; and

iii) It is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass or to cause unnecessary delay or needless increase in the cost of litigation.

37
Q

VA: When a lawyer is super rude in court, can the judge hold her in contempt?

A

Among the limited situations in which the courts and judges may issue attachments for contempt, and punish summarily is when vile, contemptuous, or insulting language addressed to or published of a judge in respect of any act or proceeding had, or to be had, in such court.

Among the sanctions that the court may impose for violation of the Virginia sanction statute is prohibiting the attorney from practicing before it.

The Canons of Judicial Conduct mandate that a judge should inform the Virginia State Bar when the judge has knowledge that a lawyer has committed misconduct that raises a “substantial question” about the lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects.

38
Q

When can police enter a 3rd party home to execute an arrest warrant?

A

Police may enter a third party’s home to legally execute an arrest warrant only when they have (1) a search warrant, (2) exigent circumstances, or (3) the third party’s consent. But an illegal arrest does not bar subsequent prosecution of the arrestee, so long as the arrestee was properly charged.

39
Q

What’s the plain view doctrine?

A

The “plain view” doctrine allows an officer, while properly executing a warrant, to seize evidence not particularly described in the warrant if (1) the officer is lawfully on the premises, (2) the incriminating character of the item is immediately apparent, and (3) the officer has lawful access to the item.

40
Q

When can school officials search a student?

A

School officials need only have a reasonable suspicion that a student is violating (or has violated) the law or school rules to search that student. Then, the search methods must be (1) reasonably related to the objective of the search and (2) not excessively intrusive considering the student’s age, sex, and the nature of the infraction.

41
Q

Are police flyovers Fourth Amendment searches?

A

NO. Police flyovers are not Fourth Amendment searches since (1) aerial observations are not physical intrusions and (2) a person has no reasonable expectation of privacy in items and areas exposed to public view. (Helicopter must be at least 400 feet)

42
Q

May a handwriting exemplar properly be taken from a D in jail?

A

Yes. The taking of handwriting exemplars does not violate the Fourth Amendment (no reasonable expectation of privacy), the Fifth Amendment (no protection for physical evidence), or the Sixth Amendment (not a critical stage of prosecution)

43
Q

Is it an interrogation if the police place an undercover informant in a cell with a jailed suspect?

A

YES, probably, if undercover informant is acting at police’s request and solicits info. (A jailhouse informant who does not solicit and isn’t directed by the police is fine)

An interrogation occurs when an officer or undercover informant engages in conduct designed to deliberately elicit an incriminating response from the defendant. Statements taken in violation of a defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to counsel cannot be used directly in deciding guilt or innocence. But such statements can be used for the limited purpose of impeaching the defendant’s inconsistent testimony.

44
Q

If a defendant was erroneously denied their choice of counsel, what happens?

A

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel protects non-indigent criminal defendants’ right to choose the attorney who will represent them. The erroneous denial of a defendant’s choice of counsel constitutes structural error and requires automatic reversal of the defendant’s conviction.

45
Q

VA: definition of larceny, including grand vs simple larceny

A

Larceny is defined at common law and adopted by Virginia as the taking of another’s personal property by trespass with the intent to permanently deprive that person of the property. Any person commits grand larceny (a felony) if he commits the following: (i) larceny from another’s person of money or thing of value of $5 or more; (ii) simple larceny not from another’s person of goods and chattels with a value of $1,000 or more; or (iii) simple larceny not from another’s person of a firearm, regardless of value.

46
Q

VA: an unlawful homicide is presumed to be which crime?

A

Every unlawful homicide in Virginia is presumed to be murder of the second degree.

47
Q

VA: How does the commonwealth show murder in the first degree?

A

In order to rise to the level of first-degree or aggravated murder, the Commonwealth must make a prima facie showing that malice or premeditation exists and if so shown, the burden of producing mitigating (e.g., heat of passion) evidence shifts to the defendant. Once the defendant has shown some evidence of a mitigating factor, the Commonwealth must prove the absence of such factor beyond a reasonable doubt. Murder by poison, lying in wait, imprisonment, starving, or any willful, deliberate, and premeditated killing not specified in the aggravated murder statute is murder of the first degree.

48
Q

VA: who is the principal in the first degree?

A

A principal in the first degree is the person whose acts or omissions are the actus reus of the crime, or, in other words, the perpetrator of the crime.

49
Q

VA: who is a principal in the second degree and what crime can they be convicted of?

A

A principal in the second degree is a person who is present at the commission of the crime and shares the principal in the first degree’s intent that the crime be committed or aids, abets, encourages, assists, or advises a principal in the first degree in the commission of the crime. Mere presence and subsequent flight are not enough to convict a person as a principal in the second degree. A principal in the second degree may be indicted, tried, convicted, and punished in the same manner as a principal in the first degree.

50
Q

What is an accessory before the fact in VA?

A

The difference between an accessory before the fact and a principal in the second degree is PRESENCE. An accessory before the fact is not present during the commission of the crime. An accessory before the fact’s assistance to the principal may be verbal encouragement, financial assistance, or physical assistance. Mere knowledge that a crime will result is not enough. In felony cases, every accessory before the fact may be indicted, tried, convicted, and punished in the same manner as a principal in the first degree.

51
Q

VA: What is an accessory after the fact and what are they guilty of? Exceptions?

A

An accessory after the fact is a person who knows a felony has been committed and thereby aids or assists a principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact avoid or escape prosecution. An accessory after the fact is not subject to punishment for the crime committed by the principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact. An accessory after the fact is subject to punishment for (i) a class 6 felony in the case of a homicide offense punishable as a class 2 felony, or (ii) a class 1 misdemeanor in the case of any other felony, as long as he is not the spouse, parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, sibling, or servant to the principal in the first degree or accessory before the fact.

52
Q

Can the Commonwealth bring two unrelated charges against a person in a single trial?

A

Only if D consents. Two or more offenses may be charged in separate counts of the same indictment or information as long as the charges are based on the same act, transaction, or on two or more acts or transactions that are connected or parts of a common scheme or plan. The defendant must be tried for all offenses pending against him as long as justice does not require separate trials and the offenses may be joined or the parties consent.

53
Q

MBE: What’s the agency theory of felony murder?

A

Under the agency theory of felony murder (majority rule), a defendant is responsible for deaths proximately caused by him/herself or cofelons during the commission or attempted commission of an inherently dangerous felony—but not for deaths caused by others.

54
Q

Do solicitation or conspiracy merge into the completed crime?

A

Conspiracy doesnt; solicitation does.

The inchoate crime of solicitation merges into the completed target crime, thereby barring a conviction for both. In contrast, conspiracy does not merge into the completed target crime. Therefore, a conviction for both conspiracy and the completed target crime is permissible.

55
Q

Does opening an unlocked door count for the “breaking” element of burglary?

A

YES. The breaking element of burglary is satisfied once the defendant uses any amount of force to create an opening into the dwelling, and a burglary is complete once the defendant enters the dwelling with the requisite intent.

56
Q

What are the crimes of “false pretenses” and “larceny by trick” and how do they differ?

A

A person who takes another’s property through fraud or deceit may be guilty of either:

false pretenses – if the person thereby obtained TITLE to the property or

larceny by trick – if the person thereby obtained mere POSSESSION of the property and converted it by so seriously interfering with the victim's property that the victim is deprived of its use or possession.
57
Q

During a Terry Stop (based on reasonable suspiction), can a police officer confiscate anything weird they feel during a pat down?

A

No. has to be immediately identifiable as a weapon, contraband, or evidence of a crime.

During an investigatory detention, police may pat down the person’s outer garments to search for weapons if they reasonably suspect that the person may be armed and dangerous. In doing so, an officer who feels ONLY an object immediately identifiable as a weapon, contraband, or evidence of a crime may seize the object.

58
Q

In a case against a corporation, can an employee refuse to produce company records because they would PERSONALLY incriminate her?

A

NO.

The Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination applies only to individuals—not corporations. Therefore, when a corporation is the target of an investigation, the custodian of corporate records cannot refuse to produce subpoenaed documents by citing the privilege—even if the documents would incriminate him/her personally.

59
Q

When does a presumption in a criminal case violate due process?

A

A presumption that (1) relieves the prosecution of its burden to prove an element of the charged crime or (2) shifts the burden of proof regarding an element to the defendant does violate due process.

60
Q

When is there a right to a jury trial on a charge of criminal contempt?

A

The right to a jury trial on a charge of criminal contempt exists only if a sentence of imprisonment exceeds six months. Here, the father was not sentenced to more than six months in prison.

61
Q

Can a court impose a higher punishment on an appellant who is again found guilty, just to punish them for appealing? Why?

A

NO.

Due process prohibits the imposition of a harsher sentence upon retrial of a defendant who successfully appealed a conviction when the harsher sentence is punishment for exercising the right to appeal. In such cases, the sentence should be vacated.

62
Q

What does SCOTUS say should happen when one confession was not mirandaized but the second confession was? Should the second confession be suppressed?

A

Maybe!

the U.S. Supreme Court has held that a second confession may be suppressed when the circumstances indicate that the substance of Miranda has been drained away. For a plurality of the court, the test is an objective one—a reasonable person in the suspect’s position would not have understood the Miranda warnings to convey a message that the suspect retained a choice about whether to remain silent. For the justice who cast the deciding vote (Justice Kennedy), the test is a subjective one—did the police act with an intent to circumvent the purpose of the Miranda warnings.

63
Q

What is embezzlement?

A

Embezzlement is the fraudulent use, concealment, disposing of, or embezzling of any commercial paper or tangible or intangible property that was: (i) received for another person or for one’s employer, (ii) received by virtue of one’s office or employment, or (iii) entrusted to one by another.

64
Q

VA: definition of a conspiracy. Is overt act required?

A

A person is guilty of conspiracy if he confederates or agrees with another to commit a felony. Virginia does NOT require an overt act to be performed to complete a conspiracy; however, such conduct may support a finding of the existence of a conspiracy.

65
Q

Dude growing poppies in his field, surrounded by “do not trespass” and fence. Can police go in and look around the fields without a warrant?

A

YES. It’s not curtilage, and the “open fields doctrine” allows gov’t search without a warrant.

66
Q

Does the “plain view” doctrine all police to use evidence found in an UNLAWFUL arrest?

A

NO. Evidence seized pursuant to an unlawful arrest may be suppressed at trial.

67
Q

Could the police force someone who’s been arrested to submit to a blood alcohol test?

A

If they can, it’s under exigency.

While generally the Fourth Amendment mandates that police officers obtain a warrant before a blood sample can be drawn, a warrantless search is permitted in EXIGENT circumstances when they cannot reasonably do so without significantly undermining the efficacy of the search.

68
Q

4 factors to determine curtilage?

A

In determining whether an area is protected as curtilage, the following four-factor test applies: (i) the proximity of the area to the home; (ii) whether the area is included within an enclosure surrounding the home; (iii) the nature of the uses to which the area is put; and (iv) the steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by passersby.

69
Q

Are traffic stops custodial?

A

Traffic stops generally are not considered custodial because they generally are brief and temporary.

70
Q

Under MPC, if no level of culpability is stated, whats the minimum level of intent required for a crime? negligently, recklessly, knowingly/willfully, or purposely?

A

recklessly

71
Q

Does an honest but unreasonable mistake negate criminal intent?

A

YES. Mistake of fact may negate criminal intent for both specific and general intent crimes if the mistake is an “honest mistake.” For specific intent crimes, a mistake of fact is a valid defense even if the mistake is unreasonable.

Theft crimes are specific intent crimes, however, and thus a mistake of fact need not be reasonable so long as it is honest.

(i.e. picking up someone else’s coat–not guilty)

72
Q

If you walk through an open door, is that “breaking” for burglary?

A

NO.

Burglary is the breaking and entering of the dwelling of another at night with the specific intent to commit a felony. Breaking requires creating an opening in the structure of the dwelling, such as raising a window or pushing open a door. If entry is gained with consent, a breaking can still occur if the defendant breaks into a part of the dwelling structure, such as by opening a closet door or wall safe.

73
Q

Define an unreasonable search.

A

An unreasonable search occurs when the government (i) invades a place protected by a reasonable expectation of privacy, or (ii) physically intrudes upon a constitutionally protected area to gather information.

74
Q

Explain the three conditions for evidence to be seized under the plain view rule.

A

A person may not search any place, thing, or person without a properly issued warrant that reasonably describes the place to be search and the items to be seized. An exception permits the seizure of an item found in plain view even though not named in the search warrant. For this exception to apply, a police officer may seize an item in plain view as long as (i) the officer is lawfully on the premises, (ii) the incriminating character of the item is immediately apparent, and (iii) the officer has lawful access to the item.

75
Q

What does a court consider when faced with a motion to suppress evidence?

A

In considering a motion to strike out all the Commonwealth’s evidence, all inferences that a jury might fairly draw from the Commonwealth’s evidence must be drawn in its favor, unless those inferences would be strained, forced, or contrary to reason. The motion should be granted if the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to sustain the conviction.

76
Q

Can a state have a statute with a minimum IQ for establishing mental competence sufficient to be subject to capital punishment?

A

Probably not. The Eighth Amendment prohibits execution of an individual with intellectual disabilities. In determining whether an individual has intellectual disabilities, a state cannot impose a strict cutoff that precludes a finding of intellectual disability if an individual has an IQ of more than 70 because this rule creates an unacceptable risk that a person with an intellectual disability will be executed.

77
Q

Who is a principal in the second degree?

A

An accomplice who is physically or constructively present during the commission of the crime is a principal in the second degree.

78
Q

Who is an accessory before the fact?

A

An accomplice that is neither physically nor constructively present during the commission of the crime, but who, with the requisite intent to encourage or assist in the commission of the crime, provided verbal encouragement, financial assistance, or physical assistance to the principal prior to the commission of the crime is an accessory before the fact.

79
Q

May a D waive right to jury trial but court still grant Commonwealth’s request for jury?

A

YES

The right to have a jury trial extends to felonies, and the ability to have a bench trial can occur with the consent of the defendant, the Commonwealth, and the judge.

80
Q

How does a D waive his right to a jury trial?

A

The defendant may waive his right to a jury trial upon the advice of his counsel, as long as the Commonwealth attorney and the judge agree and the court determines before trial that the waiver was voluntarily and intelligently given. The waiver of all parties must be on the record.

81
Q

In a jury trial, may the D request the Judge (not the jury) decide sentencing?

A

Yes. A jury trial is bifurcated to allow for both a guilt and sentencing phase, where the same jury will decide punishment, but the Judge upon consent of the defendant and the Commonwealth, can be allowed to determine the sentence.

82
Q

What court has jurisdiction over a juvenile in VA?

A

If a juvenile 14 years of age or older at the time of the offense is charged with an act that would be a felony if committed by an adult, the availability of transfer from juvenile court to circuit court is based on the defendant’s age and the nature of the felony. For any felony by juveniles 14 years of age or older at the time of the offense, the court may adjudicate guilt and impose a sentence. However, upon the Commonwealth’s motion before a hearing on the merits, the court may hold a transfer hearing to determine whether to retain jurisdiction or transfer the proceedings to the circuit court. If requested by written notice by the Commonwealth, the court also must conduct a preliminary hearing if a juvenile who was 16 years of age or older at the time of the offense is charged with certain violent crimes, including malicious wounding. If probable cause is found at that hearing, the case must be certified to the circuit court for trial. In no scenario does the General District Court have jurisdiction over a juvenile defendant.

83
Q

Can a D impeach witness w/wittness’ juvenile adjudication?

A

A criminal defendant may also impeach a witness’s character for truthfulness with the witness’s juvenile adjudication when an adult’s conviction for the offense would be admissible to attack the adult’s credibility and admitting the evidence is necessary to fairly determine guilt or innocence.

84
Q

Does attorney-client privilege apply to former clients who are now adverse to each other?

A

NO. Although a confidential communication made by a client for the purpose of obtaining or providing legal assistance for the client is generally protected by the attorney-client privilege, this privilege does not apply to communications between former co-clients who are now adverse to each other.

85
Q

If the police know exculpatory info but don’t tell the prosecutor, can the prosecutor still have a duty to disclose to the defendant?

A

YES. Under the Brady rule, a prosecutor has an affirmative duty to disclose to the defendant any material evidence favorable to the defendant, nondisclosure of such evidence does not violate the defendant’s due process rights unless the failure to disclose causes prejudice against the defendant (i.e., that there is a reasonable probability that the defendant’s conviction or sentence would have been different had the suppressed evidence been disclosed to the defendant).

86
Q

Let’s say D gets summary judgment that they’re not guilty of a crime. Their trial continues on a lesser crime. If D in testifying admits to guilty in the first crime, can the charge be added again?

A

NOPE. She’s home free. Once a charge has been dismissed on substantive grounds at trial, it may not be reinstated without violating the defendant’s double jeopardy rights, regardless of whether the defendant himself subsequently admits to the crime or an element necessary to establish the crime.

The dismissal of a charge against a defendant on substantive grounds once the trial has begun constitutes an acquittal with respect to that charge, even if the trial itself continues because the defendant is facing other charges.

87
Q

In VA, can a witness who is a D or a party be impeached by the name of their crime?

A

In impeaching a witness who is a criminal defendant or a party in a civil case, Virginia generally allows only the fact of a felony conviction or a misdemeanor involving moral turpitude and the number of convictions, not the name and nature of the crime.

88
Q

In VA, how old of a conviction can you use to impeach?

A

unlike the federal rules, the Virginia rules do not impose additional requirements on the use of a conviction for which more than 10 years have elapsed since the conviction or release from confinement, whichever is later