Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Essential Elements of a Crime - there are four

A

Almost all crimes require proof of the following four core elements:

(1) Physical Act (actus reus). The defendant must have either performed a voluntary physical act or failed to act under circumstances imposing a legal duty to act.
(2) Mental State (mens rea). The defendant must have committed the offense with a culpable state of mind. However, a defendant need not know that their conduct is illegal to be guilty of a crime.
(3) Causation. There must be a casual connection between the defendant’s physical act or failure to act and the harmful result.
(4) Concurrence. The requisite mental state must be present at the same time the physical act constituting the crime occurs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Mental State Requirements (Common Law)

A

The common law requires that one of the following four different mental states be proven depending on the crime committed:

(1) Specific Intent
(2) Malice
(3) General Intent
(4) Strict Liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Specific Intent

A

This requires that the crime be committed with a specific intent or objective. The existence of specific intent cannot be conclusively imputed from the mere doing of an act, but the manner in which the crime was committed may provide evidence of intent.

The following are specific intent crimes (and the specific intent required): Solicitation, attempt, conspiracy, first degree murder, assault, larceny, robbery, burglary, forgery, false pretenses, embezzlement.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the intent necessary for malice crimes? what are malice crimes?

A

The intent necessary for malice crimes require a reckless disregard of an obvious or high risk that the particular harmful result will occur.

Defenses to specific intent crimes (e.g., voluntary intoxication) do NOT apply to malice crimes. Malice crimes include: Common Law Murder; AND Arson.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

General Intent

A

General intent is a “catch-all” category of intent. It requires that the defendant intend to commit an act that is prohibited by law (whether the defendant intended the act’s result is irrelevant). General intent crimes include: Battery; Rape; Manslaughter; Kidnapping; AND False Imprisonment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Strict Liability offenses

A

Strict liability only requires that the defendant voluntarily commit the actus reus (regardless of the defendant’s intent). Defenses that negate state of mind (e.g., mistake of fact) are NOT available.

Strict liability offenses include:
Statutory Rape; Selling Liquor to Minors; AND Bigamy (some jurisdictions)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Mental State Requirements (Modern Penal Code)

A

The Model Penal Code eliminates the common law distinctions between general and specific intent and adopts the following four categories of intent:
(1) Purposely. A defendant acts “purposely” when his conscious objective is to engage in the conduct or to cause a certain result.
(2) Knowingly or willfully. A defendant acts “knowingly or willingly” when the defendant is aware that his conduct is of the nature required by the crime or that circumstances required by the crime exist.
(3) Recklessly. A defendant acts “recklessly” when the defendant acts with a conscious disregard of substantial and unjustifiable risk that a material
element of a crime exists or will result from his conduct. The risk must constitute a gross deviation from the standard of conduct of a law-abiding person.
(4) Negligently. A defendant acts “negligently” when the defendant fails to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that a material element of a crime exists or will result from his conduct. The risk must constitute a gross deviation from the standard of conduct of a reasonable person in the same situation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Common Law Murder

A

Murder is the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

state of mind for malice aforethought

A

Malice aforethought exists if there are NO facts reducing the killing to voluntary manslaughter or excusing it AND it was committed with one of the following states of mind:

(1) Intent to kill;
(2) Intent to inflict great bodily injury;
(3) Reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life (“depraved heart murder”); OR
(4) Intent to commit a felony (under the felony murder rule)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Voluntary Manslaughter

A

Voluntary manslaughter is a killing that would be murder BUT FOR the existence of adequate provocation. Provocation is adequate only if:

(1) It was a provocation that would arouse sudden and intense passion in the mind of an ordinary person, causing him to lose self-control;
AND
(2) There was NOT sufficient time between the provocation and the killing for passions of a reasonable person to cool off.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Involuntary Manslaughter

A

Involuntary manslaughter is an unintentional killing committed:

(1) With criminal negligence; OR
(2) In the commission of a misdemeanor or in the commission of a felony that is not statutorily treated as 1st degree felony murder or 2nd degree murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

First and Second Degree Murder

A

In some jurisdictions, murder is divided into degrees by statute. Generally, a murder is 2nd degree murder UNLESS it falls under any of the following statutory aggravating circumstances, which make it 1st degree murder:

(1) Premeditation. The murder was deliberate and premeditated. If the defendant made the decision to kill in a cool and dispassionate manner and actually reflected on the idea of killing, even if only for a very brief period (e.g., a few seconds), it is 1st degree murder.
(2) Felony Murder. The murder falls under a 1st degree felony murder statute. In many states, a killing committed during the commission of an enumerated felony is felony murder and called 1st degree murder.

The most commonly listed felonies in such statutes are burglary, arson, rape, robbery, and kidnapping (BARRK); however, other felonies that are inherently dangerous to human life are often included as well.

(3) Heinous Murder. The murder is performed in a certain way (e.g., torture, mutilation, etc.). Some states make these types of killings 1st degree murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Felony Murder Rule

limitation to the felony murder rule

A

Any death caused in the commission of, or in an attempt to commit, a felony is murder. However there are several limitations to this rule:

(1) The defendant must have committed or attempted to commit the underlying felony – a defense that negates an element of an underlying offense will also be a defense to felony murder;
(2) The felony must be distinct from the killing itself;
(3) The death must have been a foreseeable result of the felony; AND
(4) The death must have been caused before the defendant’s “immediate flight” from when the felony ended.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Homicide Causation

A

To be liable for homicide, the defendant’s conduct must be BOTH the cause-in-fact and the proximate cause of the victim’s death:

(1) Cause-In-Fact. A defendant’s conduct is the cause-in-fact of the victim’s death if the death would not have occurred BUT FOR the defendant’s conduct.

(2) Proximate Cause. A defendant’s conduct is the proximate cause of the victim’s death if the death is a natural and probable consequence of defendant’s
conduct. Superseding events break the chain of proximate causation (i.e., intervening events that are NOT foreseeable generally shield the defendant).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Battery

A

Battery is the:

(1) Unlawful (without legal excuse);
(2) Application of force;
(3) To the person of another;
(4) That results in bodily harm or offensive contact.

Remember, battery is a general intent crime (intent to cause injury is NOT necessary – only the intent to do the unlawful act is required).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assault

A

Assault is either:

(1) An attempt to commit a battery; OR
(2) Intentionally placing another in apprehension of imminent bodily harm.

If there has been physical contact with the victim, the crime can only be battery, not assault.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

False Imprisonment

A

False imprisonment consists of the:

(1) Unlawful (without legal excuse);
(2) Confinement of a person;
(3) Without valid consent.

Remember, false imprisonment is a general intent crime (intent to cause injury is NOT necessary – only the intent to do the unlawful act is required).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Kidnapping

A

Modern statutes define kidnapping as unlawful confinement of a person that involves either:

(1) Some movement of the victim; OR
(2) Hiding the victim.

Remember, kidnapping is a general intent crime (intent to cause injury is NOT necessary – only the intent to do the unlawful act is required).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Rape

A

Common law rape requires:

(1) Unlawful sexual intercourse;
(2) With a female;
(3) Against her will by force or threat of force.

However, most modern day rape statutes have relaxed the common law elements. There is now rape that:

(1) Does not have to involve a woman;
(2) Can occur without force or threat of force (e.g., involuntary intoxication); AND
(3) Can involve activity other than intercourse.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Statutory Rape

A

Statutory rape requires only that there is sexual intercourse with a person under age.

The defendant’s reasonable mistake of fact as to the victim’s age will NOT shield the defendant’s liability, because statutory rape is a strict liability crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Larceny

A

Larceny consists of:

(1) A taking (obtaining possession);
(2) And carrying away;
(3) Of the personal property (not real property) of another;
(4) By trespass (without consent);
(5) With intent to permanently deprive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Embezzlement

A

Embezzlement consists of:

(1) The fraudulent conversion;
(2) Of the personal property of another;
(3) By a person in lawful possession of that property.

Note: Custody of the property is insufficient – the defendant must be in lawful possession of the property when the conversion occurs for it to
constitute embezzlement. Possession involves a greater scope of authority to deal with property than does custody (e.g., low level employees usually only have custody of their employer’s property – thus, they commit larceny if they take it).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

False Pretenses

A

False pretenses consists of:

(1) Obtaining TITLE;
(2) To the personal property of another;
(3) By an intentional false representation;
(4) Of a material past or present fact (not opinion);
(5) With intent to defraud.

24
Q

Larceny By Trick

A

Larceny by trick occurs when the defendant:

(1) Obtaining possession or custody (NOT title);
(2) To the personal property of another;
(3) By an intentional false representation;
(4) Of a material past or present fact (not opinion);
(5) With intent to defraud.

25
Q

Robbery

A

Robbery consists of:

(1) A taking and carrying away;
(2) Of the personal property of another;
(3) From the other’s person or presence;
(4) By force or threat of force;
(5) With the intent to permanently deprive.

26
Q

Receipt of Stolen Property

A

Receipt of stolen property consists of:

(1) Receiving possession and control;
(2) Of stolen personal property;
(3) Known to have been obtained in an unlawful manner;
(4) By another person;
(5) With the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property.

27
Q

Burglary

A

Common law burglary consists of:

(1) A breaking;
(2) And entry;
(3) Of the dwelling of another;
(4) At nighttime;
(5) With the intent to commit a felony in the structure (at the time of entry).

28
Q

Arson

A

Common law arson consists of:

(1) The malicious;
(2) Burning;
(3) Of the dwelling of another.

29
Q

Attempt

A

An attempt requires:

(1) The specific intent to perpetrate a crime;
AND
(2) An overt act beyond mere preparation that falls short of completing the crime. Most states require the overt act to be a “substantial step” toward
completion of the crime under a subjective test.

30
Q

Abandonment/Withdrawal of an Attempted Crime, compare common law versus the MPC

A

Under the common law, abandonment or withdrawal is NOT a defense to attempt. If the defendant had the intent and committed an overt act beyond mere preparation, she is guilty of attempt despite the fact that she changed her mind and abandoned the plan before the crime was completed.

However, under the Model Penal Code (minority of jurisdictions), a fully voluntary and complete abandonment is a valid defense. Abandonment is not voluntary if it is motivated by a desire to avoid detection.

31
Q

Solicitation

A

Solicitation consists of:

(1) Requesting another to commit a crime;
(2) With the intent that the person solicited commit the crime.

32
Q

Withdrawal of a Solicitation

A

In most jurisdictions, it is NOT a defense that the solicitor renounces or withdraws the solicitation.

However, the Model Penal Code recognizes renunciation as a defense if the defendant prevents the commission of the crime.

33
Q

Common Law Conspiracy

A

Under the common law, a conspiracy consists of:

(1) An agreement between two or more persons;
(2) To accomplish a criminal objective;
(3) With the intent to enter into the agreement; AND
(4) With the intent to commit the criminal objective.

34
Q

Overt Act Requirement in a Conspiracy

A

Unlike the common law, a majority of states also require that an overt act be committed in furtherance of the criminal objective.

The overt act does NOT have to be criminal in nature (e.g., a conspirator buying a hammer in order to commit a burglary would be a sufficient overt act, even though buying a hammer is not criminal in nature).

35
Q

Pinkerton Liability (Conspiracy)

A

A conspirator may be held liable for crimes committed by their co-conspirators if the crimes were:

(1) Committed in furtherance of the criminal objective; AND
(2) Foreseeable.

36
Q

Termination of a Conspiracy

A

A conspiracy terminates upon completion of the criminal objective. All acts or statements made after termination are inadmissible against a conspirator (e.g., statements made to police after the completion of the criminal objective).

37
Q

Withdrawal of a Conspiracy

A

Withdrawal may be a defense to crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy. However, withdrawal from the conspiracy is NOT a defense to the conspiracy itself UNLESS the conspirator:

(1) Performs an affirmative act that notifies all members of the conspiracy of her withdrawal;
(2) Gives notice in time for the members to abandon their plans; AND
(3) Attempts to neutralize her assistance if she provided any as an accomplice.

38
Q

Parties to a Crime

A

Under modern statutes, there are generally three potential parties to a crime:

(1) Principal. The principal is the person who commits the illegal act or who causes an innocent agent to do so.
(2) Accomplice. The accomplice is the person who aids or encourages the principal to commit the illegal conduct.
(3) Accessory After the Fact. An accessory after the fact is a person who aids another to escape knowing that he has committed a felony.

39
Q

Liability of an Accessory After the Fact

A

An accessory after the fact is a person who aids
another to escape knowing that he has committed a felony.

An accessory after the fact is ONLY liable for the less serious offense of being an accessory after the fact (i.e., NO accomplice liability).

40
Q

Accomplice Liability

A

An accomplice is liable for all the crimes that the principal committed AND all other crimes that were a probable or foreseeable result, if the accomplice:

(1) Aids, abets, or facilitates the commission of a crime committed by the principal;
(2) With the intent that the crime be committed.

41
Q

Accomplice Withdrawal and Repudiation

A

Withdrawal is a valid defense to accomplice liability if
the accomplice withdraws his involvement BEFORE the crime becomes unstoppable.

Repudiation is a sufficient withdrawal for mere encouragement. If the accomplice’s involvement went beyond mere encouragement, then the accomplice must attempt to neutralize his assistance for the withdrawal to be sufficient.

42
Q

Fitness to Stand Trial

A

A criminal defendant must be competent to stand trial. To be competent, under the Dusky test, the defendant must have:

(1) Sufficient present ability to consult with his lawyer with a reasonable degree of rational understanding; AND
(2) A rational as well as factual understanding of the proceedings against him.

43
Q

Insanity Defense Under the M’Naghten Rule

A

Under this rule, a defendant is entitled to acquittal if, because of a mental illness, he did not know:

(a) The nature and quality of the unlawful act;
OR
(b) The wrongfulness of the unlawful act.

44
Q

Insanity Defense Under the Irresistible Impulse Test

A

Under this test, a defendant is entitled to acquittal if,
because of a mental illness, he lacked the capacity:

(a) For self-control and free choice;
OR
(b) To conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.

45
Q

Insanity Defense Under the Modern Penal Code Test

A

Under this test, a defendant is entitled to acquittal if,
because of a mental illness, he did NOT have substantial capacity:

(a) To appreciate the wrongfulness of the unlawful act;
OR
(b) To conform his conduct to the requirements of the law.

46
Q

Insanity Defense Under the Durham Test

A

Under this test, a defendant is entitled to acquittal if the unlawful act would not have been committed BUT FOR the defendant’s mental illness.

47
Q

Voluntary Intoxication as a Criminal Defense

A

Voluntary intoxication (intentional ingestion of an intoxicating substance without duress, which is known to be intoxicating to the person ingesting the substance) is a valid defense to specific intent crimes if the intoxication prevents the formation of the required intent. Voluntary intoxication does NOT apply to general intent, malice, or strict liability crimes.

48
Q

Involuntary Intoxication as a Criminal Defense

A

Involuntary intoxication (ingestion of an intoxicating substance under duress or without knowledge of its intoxicating effects) is a valid defense to ALL crimes if the intoxication serves to negate an element of the crime.

49
Q

Self-Defense with Non-Deadly Force

A

A person without fault may use non-deadly force in self-defense if she:

(1) Is confronted with unlawful force; AND
(2) Reasonably believes it is necessary to protect herself from the imminent use of unlawful force upon herself.

50
Q

Self-Defense with Deadly Force

A

A person without fault may use deadly force in self-defense if she:

(1) Is confronted with unlawful force; AND
(2) Reasonably believes that she is threatened with imminent death or great bodily harm.

51
Q

Duty to Retreat Before Using Deadly Force

A

In a minority of jurisdictions, a person MUST retreat before using deadly force if the victim can safely do so UNLESS:

(1) The attack occurs in the victim’s own home;
(2) The attack occurs while the victim is making a lawful arrest; OR
(3) The assailant is in the process of robbing the victim.

52
Q

Imperfect Self-Defense

A

Imperfect self-defense can reduce a murder charge to voluntary manslaughter if the defendant kills another based on an honest but unreasonable belief that the use of deadly force was necessary to prevent death or serious bodily harm.

53
Q

Defense of Others with Force

A

A defendant may defend others with force if he reasonably believes that the person assisted has the legal right to use force in her own defense.

Only some courts allow imperfect self-defense to be applied to situations where the defendant was defending another person.

54
Q

Duress as a Criminal Defense

A

The defense of duress is available to the defendant if the defendant reasonably believed that another person would imminently inflict death or great bodily harm upon him or a family member if he did not commit the crime.

Under the Model Penal Code, threats to property can be sufficient for a duress defense if the value of the property outweighs the harm done to society by commission of the crime.

55
Q

Mistake of Fact as a Criminal Defense

A

Mistake of fact is a defense that shows the defendant lacked the state of mind required
for the crime. If the charged offense is a specific intent crime, the mistake need NOT have been reasonable. For malice and general intent crimes, the mistake MUST have been reasonable. Mistake of fact is irrelevant if the crime imposes strict liability.