Criminal Law Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Sources of legal duty to act (under which an omission can be penalized)

A

1) Statute
2) Contract
3) Relationship
4) Voluntary assumption of care
5) Defendant created the peril

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Specific Intent Crimes (+ def)

A
def = intent to engage in proscribed conduct 
Students can always fake a laugh, even for ridiculous bar facts
Solicitation
Conspiracy
Attempt
First degree murder 
Assault 
Larceny
Embezzlement
False pretenses
Robbery
Burglary
Forgery
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

General Intent Crimes + def

A
= defendant aware of all factors constituting the crime, jury can infer from the act itself 
Battery
Rape
Kidnapping
False imprisonment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Malice Crimes + definition

A

def = reckless disregard of an obvious or high risk that harmful result will occur

Arson
Common Law Murder (includes felony murder; malice is implied from intent to commit felony)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Strict Liability Crimes

A

Statutory Rape

Selling liquor to minors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Transferred Intent Crimes

A

Homicide
Battery
Arson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Accomplice liability

A

1) intent to assist principal in commission of a crime
2) intent that the principal commit the offense
NOTE: If mens rea is reckless/negligence: 1) intent to facilitate crime + 2) acted with recklessness/negligence

3) aid/encourage principal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Accomplice liability - withdrawal

A
  • Before the crime becomes unstoppable
  • Repudiate any encouragement
  • Attempt to neutralize assistance
  • Notify police
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Conspiracy

A

1) agreement between 2+ persons
2) intent to enter into agreement
3) intent to achieve objective of agreement
–>CL bilateral intent: 2+ people must intend to achieve
–>Modern unilateral intent: 1 person must intend to achieve
[4) an overt act]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Conspiracy - Withdrawal

A

Generally, NOT a defense
For crimes committed in furtherance of the conspiracy: if perform an affirmative act that notifies all members of withdrawal, neutralize assistance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Solicitation

A

Asking, inciting, counseling, advising, urging, commanding another to commit a crime
With intent that the person commit the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Solicitation - Withdrawal

A

MPC only: renunciation can be a defense if defendant prevents commission of the crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Attempt

A

1) specific intent to commit a crime
2) an overt act in furtherance of the crime
- ->traditional: dangerously close; modern: substantial step

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Attempt - Withdrawal

A

Common law: not a defense

MPC: abandonment is a defense if fully voluntary and complete

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Common law murder

A

Unlawful killing with malice aforethought
Malice aforethought exists if defendant has:
1. Intent to kill
2. Intent to inflict great bodily injury
3. Reckless indifference to an unjustifiably high risk to human life/depraved heart
4. Intent to commit a felony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

First degree murder

A
  1. Deliberate and premeditated murder (with reflection)

2. First degree felony murder (BARRK - burglary, arson, rape, robbery, kidnap)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Second degree murder

A
  1. Depraved heart murders

2. Lesser felony murders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Felony Murder - liability for deaths

A
  • NL if co-felon is killed as a result of resistance from victim/police
  • Proximate cause theory: felons liable for deaths of victims caused by someone other than a co-felon
  • Agency theory: felons liable for killings by felons or agents
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Voluntary manslaughter

A

a killing that occurred because of adequate provocation (would arouse sudden and intense passion in a reasonable person, defendant was provoked, insufficient cooling off time to a RP, did not cool off)

20
Q

Imperfect self-defense

A

Reduces a murder charge to manslaughter even though 1) defendant was at fault in starting the altercation or 2) defendant unreasonably but honestly believed in the necessity of deadly force

21
Q

Involuntary Manslaughter

A

a killing with criminal negligence OR recklessness (depends on the state)
a killing during the commission of an unlawful act (unenumerated misdemeanor/felony)

22
Q

Causation-Homicide

A

A defendant must be cause-in-fact + proximate cause of death

  • Cause in fact: but-for cause
  • Proximate cause: death was the natural and probable consequence of conduct
  • -> an intervening act can shield the defendant from liability if the act is a mere coincidence or is outside the foreseeable sphere of risk created by the defendant’s act
23
Q

Battery

A

Unlawful force

Resulting in bodily injury/offensive touching

24
Q

Assault

A

Attempt to commit a battery OR
Intentional creation–other than by mere words–of a reasonable apprehension in the mind of the victim of imminent bodily harm

25
Q

False imprisonment

A

Unlawful confinement of a person (MPC: confinement must “interfere substantially” with person’s liberty)
Without the person’s valid consent

26
Q

Kidnapping

A

Unlawful confinement that involves 1) movement of the victims OR 2) concealment of the victim

27
Q

Larceny

A
a taking
and carrying away
of tangible personal property
of another 
by trespass (i.e. without consent)
with intent to permanently deprive of interest in property
28
Q

Embezzlement

A
fraudulent
conversion 
of personal property
of another
by a person in lawful possession of that property
29
Q

False pretenses

A

obtaining title
to personal property of another
by an intentional false statement of a past/existing fact
with intent to defraud the other

30
Q

larceny by trick

A

taking and carrying away of tangible personal property
by consent induced by misrepresentation
with intent to permanently deprive

31
Q

False pretenses vs. larceny by trick

A

False pretenses – victim gives up title

Larceny by trick – victim gives up custody

32
Q

Robbery

A

a taking
of personal property of another
from the other’s person or presence (broadly drawn)
by force or threats of imminent death/physical injury
with the intent to permanently deprive them of it

33
Q

Embezzlement vs. larceny vs. robbery

A

Embezzlement – defendant misappropriates property in their rightful possession
Larceny – defendant misappropriates property NOT in possession
Robbery – defendant uses force/threats to obtain property

34
Q

Extortion

A

CL: corrupt collection of an unlawful fee by an officer
Modern: obtaining property by means of threats to do harm or expose information

35
Q

Receiving stolen property

A

receiving possession and control
of stolen personal property (*stolen at the time received)
known to have been obtained in a manner constituting a criminal offense
by another person
with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of their interest

36
Q

forgery

A

making or altering
a writing with apparent legal significance
so that it is false
with intent to defraud

37
Q

burglary

A
a breaking
and entry
[of a dwelling]
of another
[at nighttime]
with the intent to commit a felony
38
Q

Arson

A

a malicious
burning
[of the dwelling]
of another

39
Q

Insanity tests

A

M’Naughten rule: 1) disease of the mind 2) caused a defect of reason 3) defendant lacked ability at time of actions to know wrongfulness

Irresistible impulse: because of mental illness, unable to control actions/conform to law

Durham test: if crime was a product of mental illness

MPC test: if, due to mental defect, lacked substantial capacity to 1) appreciate criminality of conduct or 2) conform conduct to law

40
Q

when can a failure to act give rise to liability?

A
  • legal duty to act
  • defendant has knowledge of the facts giving rise to the duty
  • it is reasonably possible to perform the duty
41
Q

Purposely - MPC def

A

A person’s conscious object is to engage in conduct/cause a result

42
Q

Knowingly - MPC def

A

a person is aware their conduct is of a particular nature/circumstances exist; or deliberately avoid knowing the truth

43
Q

Recklessly - MPC def

A

consciously disregard a substantial and unjustifiable risk (subjective); this disregard is a gross deviation from the standard of care of a reasonable person (objective)

44
Q

Negligently - MPC def

A

fail to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk, where this is a substantial deviation from the standard of care (objective standard only)

45
Q

mistake as a defense

A
  • mistake of fact: a reasonable state of mind negates all mens rea, except strict liability
  • mistake of law: not a defense, unless statute wasn’t made available, reasonably rely on a statute/judge