Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

SQE1 Volume 1 > Criminal Law > Flashcards

Criminal Law Flashcards

1
Q

Where do all criminal cases begin?

A

The Magistrates Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where are more serious criminal cases heard?

A

Crown Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who would bring a case against a defendant on behalf of the State?

A

The CPS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Who else might prosecute under criminal law?

A 
Local Authorities 
Parliament
Charities 
Citizens 
Organisations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the aim of criminal law?

A

Compensate for and prevent criminal acts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Are the rules in a criminal court stricter than in a tort court?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the burden of proof?

A

Who has the burden of proving a criminal act was committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Who has the burden of proof in a criminal case?

A

The prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

When are the 2 situations a burden of proof will be reversed?

A
  1. Certain Defences

2. Certain excuses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the evidential burden?

A

Once the defendant raises a defence, the prosecution has the burden of proof of disproving it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the standard of proof in a criminal case?

A

Prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is actus reus?

A

A physical act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is mens rea?

A

The mental state

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the three possible elements to actus reus?

A

Conduct
Circumstance
Result

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the element of actus reus of conduct?

A

These are physical acts or omissions by the defendant that make the defendant liable for the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the element of actus reus of circumstances?

A

These are facts that must exist for a defendant to be liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is the element of actus reus of result?

A

This is the outcome that must occur for the offence to be committed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Can an omission be a criminal act?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What are the two requirements that must be satisfied for a failure to act to amount to a criminal offence?

A
  • There must be a duty on behalf of the defendant to act; and
  • The defendant must have breached that duty by failing to act sufficiently
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Is a possession of something enough to amount to actus reus?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is the test for factual causation?

A

But for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is the but for test?

A

‘but for’ the defendant’s conduct, would the result still have occurred?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Would accelerating an outcome (death) be enough to satisfy causation?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What is the test for legal causation?

A

The defendant must have played a substantial role in the act and outcome and they must have been operative so the actions of someone else would be intervening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What is the thin skull rule?

A

If the defendant causes more damage than one would expect because of preexisting issues of the victim does not negate causation. You take the victim as you find them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

What are the 2 types of intention?

A

Direct

Indirect

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What is direct intention

A

The act, circumstance or outcome specified in the offence was the defendants aim or purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What is indirect intention?

A

If the outcome was a virtual certainty of the act and the defendant realised the outcome was a virtual certainty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What offences is indirect intention applied to?

A

Specific intent offences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What is a specific intent offence?

A

These offences can only be committed intentionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What is the doctrine of transferred malice?

A

Where the defendant has an intention to hit one person however accidentally hit another, the intention can be transferred onto the other person

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

If I throw a rock to hit a person and then it hits a window and smashes it, would this fall under the transferred malice doctrine?

A

No as it must be the same offence committed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What does recklessness require?

A
  • The defendant must have foreseen the risk from the act and continues regardless; and
  • In all circumstances known to the defendant, it must be an unreasonable risk to take
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

What does the court ask regarding negligence?

A
  • Did the defendant owe a duty of care; and

- Did the defendant breach the standard of care expected?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

What is a strict liability offence?

A

One that does not require the awareness of all factors constituting the crime and the defendant can be found guilty from the mere fact that they committed the act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

How would the courts look to prosecute a corporation?

A

The prosecution would look for a ‘controlling mind’ within the corporation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

What are the required elements for murder?

A

A defendant commits murder when they:

  • Cause
  • The death of another human being
  • Unlawfully
  • With the intention to kill or cause GBH
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Does the action of murder need to be committed by a physical act?

A

No, can be caused by action or inaction of the victim if a duty of care is owed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Can you be convicted of murder of a foetus?

A

No, a foetus is not a human being.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

If a victim becomes brain dead due to the victims actions, what charge would the defendant be subject to?

A

Murder - brain dead is treated as dead

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

What is voluntary manslaughter?

A

Occurs where the actus reus and mens rea of murder are made out but there are partial defences that can reduce the offence from murder to manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

What are the 2 most common partial defences for voluntary manslaughter?

A

Diminished responsibility

Loss of control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

What must a defendant assert for diminished responsibility?

A
  • The defendant must demonstrate an abnormality of mental functioning
  • The abnormality must have arisen from a recognised medical condition
  • The abnormality must have substantially impaired the defendant’s ability to (1) understand the nature of their conduct, (2) form a rational judgement , or (3) exercise self control
  • The abnormality must provide an explanation for the killing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

To whom is the burden of proof placed on for diminished responsibility?

A

The defendant must prove each element on the balance of probabilities

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

What must be established for a defendant to successfully raise a loss of control defence?

A

They must show:

  • Their role in the killing resulted from a loss of self-control
  • The loss of self- control was caused by a qualifying trigger
  • A hypothetical person of the defendant’s age and sex might have reacted in the same way.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
46
Q

What is a qualifying trigger for the defence of loss of control?

A
  • Fear of serious violence from the victim against the defendant or any other identified person
  • Thing or things done or said which constituted circumstances of an extremely grave character and caused the defendant to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
47
Q

Is revenge a sufficient trigger for loss of control?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
48
Q

Is sexual infidelity considered a trigger for loss of control?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
49
Q

What is involuntary manslaughter?

A

If the mens rea for murder is not made out, the defendant may still be liable for involuntary manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
50
Q

What are the 2 most common types of involuntary manslaughter?

A

Unlawful act manslaughter

Gross Neglience manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
51
Q

What is unlawful act manslaughter?

A

Where the defendant commits a criminal offence that carries an objective risk to the victim and they dies as a result.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
52
Q

What are the requirements for unlawful act manslaughter?

A

The act must be:

  • Intentional
  • Unlawful
  • Dangerous
  • Cause of death
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
53
Q

Can unlawful act manslaughter be committed by ommission?

A

No it requires an act to satisfy the offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
54
Q

What causation is required for unlawful act manslaughter?

A

Both factual and legal causation
Factual = but for test
Legal = substantive and operative cause

55
Q

What is gross negligence manslaughter?

A

Covers cases which a defendant does not commit an offence or knowingly take a risk, but rather acts in an extremely negligent way that they are criminally culpable.

56
Q

What are the elements of gross negligence manslaughter?

A
  • The defendant owes the victim a duty of care
  • The defendant breached the duty of care
  • The breach caused the victim’s death
  • There was a serious and obvious risk of death; and
  • The breach amounted to gross negligence
57
Q

Is a positive act required for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

No, can result from failing to act when a duty to assist arises

58
Q

What is the offence of assault?

A

Occurs when a defendant either intentionally or recklessly causes another person to apprehend immediate unlawful personal violence

59
Q

What is the actus reus required for assault?

A

The defendant’s conduct must make the victim believe that the defendant will apply unlawful force upon them imminently.

60
Q

Can words be enough to satisfy the requirements of assault?

A

Yes

61
Q

Can words spoken negate assault?

A

Yes, if they stop the victim from believing they will be immediately assaulted

62
Q

Can a conditional threat be sufficient for assault?

A

Yes as long as it might happen

63
Q

What is the mens rea required for assault?

A

Can be intentional or reckless. The defendant must either (1) intend the victim or apprehend the application of unlawful violence, or (2) foresee that their actions could make the victim apprehend the application of unlawful force, and it must be an unreasonable risk to take

64
Q

What is the offence of battery?

A

Occurs when a defendant either intentionally or recklessly applies unlawful personal force upon another person.

65
Q

What is the actus reus required for battery?

A

The defendant must make contact with the victim’s body, and the contact must be unlawful.

66
Q

How must contact be made for the offence of battery?

A

Can be direct, indirect, delayed or by omission

67
Q

What is the mens rea required for battery?

A

Can be intentional or reckless. The defendant must foresee the risk that their actions could cause them to apply unlawful force upon the victim, and this must be an unreasonable risk to take.

68
Q

When would consent be deemed to assault or battery?

A

If it is:

  • express or implied to the defendant
  • given by someone with sufficient capacity, freedom and information to make a choice
69
Q

What is the actus reus for ABH?

A

That of assault plus causing actual bodily harm

70
Q

Must legal or factual causation be present for ABH?

A

Yes both

71
Q

What injuries would be classed as ABH?

A

Any hurt or injury calculated to interfere with health or comfort of the victim. Including:

  • Scratches, grazes and abrasions
  • Bruising and swelling
  • Temporary loss of consciousness
  • Psychiatric injury, but not fear or anxiety
72
Q

What is the mens rea of ABH?

A

Intention or recklessness as to whether a victim will apprehend the infliction of immediate unlawful violence (assault) or the application of the unlawful force (battery) is sufficient.

73
Q

What is the actus reus of GBH?

A

Causing a wound or GBH

74
Q

What is a wound defined as?

A

Any injury where both layers of the skin are broken - bruising is not enough

75
Q

What are GBH injuries defined as?

A

‘Serious harm’ such as long periods of unconsciousness, broken bones, and serious psychiatric injuries

76
Q

What is the mens rea for GBH?

A

Intention or recklessness regarding some harm. Does not need to foresee the extent of harm required just that there was some harm and it was unreasonable to take the risk

77
Q

What is the actus reus required for GBH with intent?

A

Identical to GBH

78
Q

What is the mens rea of GBH with intent?

A

A defendant must (1) intend to cause serious harm or (2) foresee the risk of some harm and intent to resist lawful apprehension.

79
Q

What are the requirements of a victims consent to ABH and GBH?

A
  • Must be express or implied to the defendant in a legally recognised manner
  • Must be effective and the victim must have the capacity freedom, and information to make a choice; and
  • Must come within a legally recognised category
80
Q

What are examples as to when a person can consent to ABH or GBH?

A

Surgery
Body modification - piercing or tattoos
Religious practices
Sports

81
Q

Can a person consent to ABH or GBH for sexual gratification?

A

If the person is fully informed yes however if not then no. The courts will not interfere with a married couple.

82
Q

What are the 5 elements of theft?

A
  • Dishonest
  • Appropriation
  • Of property
  • Belonging to another
  • With the intention to permanently deprive
83
Q

How will the court decide whether a defendant has been dishonest regarding a theft offence?

A

Ascertain the defendants knowledge as to the facts and all itself whether the defendant’s behaviour was dishonest by objective standards

84
Q

What situations would a defendant deemed not to be dishonest?

A

If the defendant believes

  • They have a right to the property
  • They would have the owners consent
  • The owner could not be discovered by taking reasonable steps
85
Q

What is the element of appropriation to the theft offence?

A

Any assumption of the rights of the owners. Can be ongoing or a repeated action

86
Q

What is included as property for the element of theft?

A

Money and all other property including intangible property, real property and personal property

87
Q

Would a lost item be able to be stolen?

A

No - items are rarely considered abandoned even after it has been lost or thrown away

88
Q

When must the intention to permanently deprive?

A

At the time of taking the item

89
Q

What are the 3 elements to robbery?

A

Theft
Force
Before or at the time of offence in order to steal

90
Q

How is force satisfied for robbery?

A
  • Infliction of force
  • Causing apprehension of force
  • Seeking to cause the apprehension of force
91
Q

What is the mens reasonable for robbery?

A

Dishonest and intention to permanently deprive (same as theft)

92
Q

What are the 2 ways to commit burglary?

A
  1. Burglary by trespass with intent

2. Burglary by offences committed following a trespassory entry

93
Q

What is required to satisfy the element of entry for burglary?

A

Defendant must have (1) knowingly or recklessly, (2) entered a building, (3) as a trespasser, (4) with any part of their body

94
Q

What are the requirements for a building or part of building?

A

Requires a structure with some degree of permanence

95
Q

What additional elements are required for burglary by trespass with intent?

A

The defendant must enter the building with the intent to steal anything in the building, inflict GBH or cause criminal damage to the building or anything inside. They must just intend to do this and does not matter if they did not do it.

96
Q

What additional elements are required for burglary by offence following trespassory entry?

A

The prosecution need not prove the defendant trespassed within intention to steal etc but merely that after entering the building they actually stole, attempted to steal, inflict GBH.

97
Q

What is the mens rea for burglary?

A

The defendant must know they are a trespasser and intend to commit the underlying offence at the point of entry.

98
Q

What weapons would be considered under the offence of aggravated burglary?

A
  • A firearm or imitation firearm
  • Weapon of offence
  • An explosive
99
Q

When would a defendant commit an offence of fraud by false representation?

A

If they dishonestly make a false representation and intend, in doing so:

  • To make a gain for themselves or another
  • To cause or risk a loss to another
100
Q

What is the actus reus for fraud by false representation?

A

Representation included as to fact, law or state of mind (Using a bank card at an ATM while pretending to be the owner of the card). Can either be untrue or simply misleading.

101
Q

What are the mens rea requirements for fraud by false representation?

A

A defendant must:

  • Know the representation is or might be false or misleading
  • Act dishonestly
  • Intend to make a gain for themselves or another, or cause or risk loss to another
102
Q

When would a defendant commit the offence of fraud by failing to disclose information?

A

If they dishonestly fail to disclose information that they are under a duty to disclose and intend, in failing to do so:

  • To make a gain for themselves or another; or
  • To cause or risk a loss to another
103
Q

What is the actus reus of fraud by failing to disclose information?

A

A legal duty will arise if a defendant has a contractual duty to disclose

104
Q

What is the mens reasonable for fraud by failing to disclose information?

A

Same as fraud by false representation

105
Q

When would a defendant commit the offence of fraud by abuse of position?

A

If they abuse their position in which they are expected to safeguard the financial interest of another.

106
Q

What is the actus reus for fraud by abuse of position?

A

The defendant must have been in a position that warrants their duty to safeguard the other’s interests by being in a position of trust or expressing loyalty. Whether abuse has occurred is a matter for the jury to decide

107
Q

What is the mens rea for fraud by abuse of position?

A

A defendant must have intended to use their position to make a gain or cause or risk a loss, a defendant does not need to know that they occupy the position in which they are expected to safeguard financial interest of another. Dishonesty is still required

108
Q

When would a defendant commit the offence of criminal damage?

A

If they, without lawful excuse, destroy or damage property belonging to another intending to do so or being reckless as to whether that property is destroyed or damaged

109
Q

What is the actus reus for criminal damage?

A

Damage includes situations where damage is slight or can be repaired easily

110
Q

Can criminal damage be caused to a bank account or copyrights?

A

No - the property must be physical

111
Q

Can a person be convicted of criminal damage to their own property?

A

No - if they are a co-owner they can

112
Q

What is the mens rea for criminal damage?

A

The defendant must intend to destroy or damage the property or be reckless as to whether the item will be damaged. The defendant must know or believe that the item belongs to another.

113
Q

What are the defences for criminal damage?

A

A defendant will have a defence if they believe:

  • That the owner did or would have consented to the damage
  • That they are protecting their own property
114
Q

What are the 3 key differences for aggravated criminal damage to regular criminal damage?

A
  • The property damaged can belong to the defendant or someone else
  • There is an additional mens rea requirement that the defendant must intend or be reckless as to the endangerment of life by the damage caused to the property
  • No defences apply
115
Q

What is the offence of arson?

A

Criminal damage by fire

116
Q

Who is the principal offender?

A

The one who commits the actus reus and has the relevant mens rea at the same time

117
Q

Who is the co-principal offender?

A

If 2 defendants act together for a common purpose in committing they act, they are both considered principal offenders

118
Q

Who is an innocent agent?

A

If the defendant asks someone to do something that the defendant knows in an offence, but the other party is unaware, the defendant can still be guilty of the offence as a principal offender. The reason is the unaware party is effectively just an instrument for the defendant to commit their crime

119
Q

What is accessorial liability?

A

If a defendant aids, abets, counsels or procures another offender they will also be guilty of the principal offence

120
Q

What is joint enterprise?

A

A doctrine that can impute criminal liability to a secondary participant if the participant assisted or encouraged the commission of a crime and in this assistance, the participant intended to assist of a crime committed by the principal.

121
Q

What is the actus reus of attempt?

A

The defendant would be guilty if they did not complete the crime but do something more than merely ‘preparatory’ towards its commission

122
Q

What is the mens rea for attempt?

A

Intention to complete the full offence and therefore cane higher than is required for the underlying substantive offence

123
Q

If the defendant attempts to commit an offence that is physically impossible, can they still be convicted?

A

Yes

124
Q

What is the offence of conspiracy?

A

An agreement between 2 or more parties to carry out an offence

125
Q

What physical act is required for conspiracy?

A

The agreement between the parties to do something that is criminal.

126
Q

Can a party conspire with someone who is not capable of agreeing to the conspiracy?

A

No

127
Q

Can a party conspire with spouses?

A

No

128
Q

Can a victim be party to conspiracy?

A

No

129
Q

Can an agreement in conspiracy be conditional?

A

Yes

130
Q

What is the mens rea for conspiracy?

A

The defendant must intend to form the agreement and must intend or know that all parts of the criminal act will be completed by themselves or other parties to the agreement

131
Q

At what age is a child able to commit a crime?

A

10 years old

132
Q

How would a court view a child who has committed a crime?

A

They would not be held to the same standard as an adult and would be held to an objective test

133
Q

How do the court deal with a defendant who is unfit to plead?

A

The court will look alone at the actus reus.
The court can send the defendant to hospital for a period of time until they improve (indefinite for murder) supervision order or absolute discharge

134
Q

What are the 2 types of intoxication?

A

Voluntary

Involuntary

SQE1 Volume 1 (16 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions