Criminal Due Process Quiz #3 Flashcards
Why did Aguilar win in Aguilar v. TX?
There was no sufficient basis for probable cause, the informant was not shown to be credible or reliable, and there was no basis of knowledge
T/F - The exclusionary rule only applies to direct evidence of an illegal search
False
T/F - There has to be probable cause even when an officer acts without a warrant
True
The two parts of the Aguilar Test
Police provide basis of knowledge of how the informant knows the information their sharing, and truth of credibility/veracity/reliability of informant
T/F - When an officer applies for a search or arrest warrant, he must have/show probable cause
True
T/F - Gates overruled Aguilar/Spinelli
True
What is the Totality of Circumstances test?
Considering all circumstances in a case to determine probable cause
Which case gave the Totality of Circumstances test?
IL v. Gates
The poisonous tree is
The illegal act(s) by the police
Is it possible to spend time in jail for an offense you might not actually go to jail for?
Yes, because the Supreme Court makes no distinction
Can you be arrested for minor criminal offenses?
Yes, because USSC said in a bright line rule you can
What case held the law that says you can be arrested for minor criminal offenses?
Atwater v. Lago Vista
T/F - Courts in MA still use the Aguilar-Spinelli test
True
US v. Steagald - Was is arrest/seizure of evidence legal?
No, because his 4th A rights were not protected
T/F/ - The police cannot arrest Joe in Patty’s home without an arrest and search warrant
True