Criminal Damage Flashcards

1
Q

What is the offence of criminal damage?

A

Any person who…

  • without lawful excuse
  • destroys
  • damages
  • property
  • belonging to another
  • intending to destroy or damage
  • reckless as to to its destruction or damage

…is guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If bellow what value of damage will the offence be summarily tried and bellow what value can it be FPN?

A
  • Bellow £5000.00 for summarily trial
  • Racially or religiously aggravated criminal damage is always triable either way
  • Bellow £300.00 for FPN
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the definition of DESTROYED?

A

There is no formal definition but it means to render it useless. There is no need to prove that the damage is a permanent or irreversible state.

  • remember graffiti and mud put on a pavement can amount to damage, if it renders the pavement unusable, even though it can be washed off.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is and what’s is not property?

A

Anything tangible or “real”, including…

  • money
  • wild creatures which have been tamed or ordinarily kept in captivity
  • the carcass of a wild creature ONCE REDUCED INTO PROPERTY OR IN THE COURSE OF BEING REDUCED (remember the hunter gathering a carcass)
  • tended crops and gardens including flower beds, pitches, trees, GM crops
  • farm animals and pets

…this does not include

  • mushrooms growing wild ON ANY LANDE
  • flowers, fruit or foliage growing wild ON ANY LAND
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Can you damage your own property?

A

Ordinarily no but if someone else has an interest in your property (such as it is shared ownership or investment) then it also “belongs to them so it can be damaged

  • you cannot even damage your own property in the course of committing another offence; such as destroying your car in insurance fraud
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Lawful excuses allows for the defence of “PERMISSION” against this offence. What is this?

A

If AT THE TIME of committing the offence…

  • the defendant BELIEVED
  • the person who is entitled to provide consent
  • consented to the destruction
  • would have consented had they known it was happening
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Lawful excuse allows the defence of PROTECTION, what is this?

A

Where property is…

  • destroyed or damaged
  • threatened to be destroyed or damaged
  • (in the case of possession with intent) intend to use , cause or permit its use to destroy or damage
  • in order to protect property belonging to them or another

at that time they had an honest BELIEF…

  • the property was in IMMEDIATE NEED of protection
  • the action taken was proportionate and reasonable under the circumstances (remember destroying military property to avert a “potential” nuclear war is not proportionate)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The belief needed for any defence must be HONESTLY HELD. describe the circumstances where it is acceptable and where it is not.

A
  • if the belief is honestly held then INTOXICATION, STUPIDITY, FORGETFULNESS and INATTENTION can all be accepted as part of the defence
  • GOD is not a lawful consent to destroying property
  • You cannot protect property in other countries because the immediacy to protect it cannot be justified normally
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the offence of aggravated criminal damage?

A

Any person who, without lawful excuse…

  • destroys or damages
  • property
  • bellowing to THEM or ANOTHER
  • intending to destroy or damage it
  • being reckless as to destroy or damage it

…and by dooming this…

  • intends to endanger the life of ANOTHER (only)
  • is reckless as to wether another’s life would be endangered

…shall be guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Can you use the defences in this act, PROTECTION or CONSENT, for an aggravated offence?

A

No, only the general defences open to all crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What consideration do you have to give to how the damage will endanger life in an aggravated offence?

A
  • the damage itself, and the act of causing the damage, must be the thing which endangers life
  • shooting through a glass window will damage the window but the broken glass will not normally be the source of harm, the bullet will be
  • ramming a car or smashing it’s windscreen can be the source of harm to someone because it can directly result in injury to the people inside
  • it does not matter how trivial the resulting damage is, if the intent was harm by causing it, the offence is complete
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the offence of threats to destroy or damage property?

A

Any person who…

  • without lawful excuse
  • makes a threat
  • to another
  • INTENDING that person to fear it would be carried out
  • to destroy or damage ANY property belonging to them or a third party
  • to destroy their own property in such a way as to endanger the life of that person or ANOTHER person

…is guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does it matter if a threat to cause damage is or even could be carried out?

A

No; it is only the intent of the person committing the act. The fact the other person does not fear or that it cannot even be carried out is irrelevant. As long as they intend them to fear it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the offence of having articles with intent to destroy or damage property?

A

Any person who…

  • has in their custody or control
  • ANYTHING
  • with intent to / cause or permit another to
  • destroy or damage property belonging to ANOTHER
  • destroy or damage his own property in such a way as to endanger life

…is guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Is having an article with a conditional intent on enough to complete the offence of having articles with intent?

A

Yes; just having a Lyn intent to potentially cause damage (if those conditions are met) is enough

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the offence of interference with goods?

A

Any person who…

  • with intent
  • cause anxiety or alarm
  • injury to a member of the public
  • cause economic loss by goods being shunned
  • cause economic loss by having to take steps to avoid, anxiety, alarm, injury or loss
  • contaminates or interferes with goods
  • place goods which have been contaminated or interfered with
  • make it appear that goods have been contaminated or interfered with
  • in a place where such goods are consumed, used or sold

It is also an offence to threaten or claim to have done any of the above with the intent to cause the above outcome

It is also an offence to have in your possession…

  • articles to contaminate, interfere with or create the appearance of such goods
  • goods which have been interfered with or contaminated or have the appearance of such
17
Q

When would a person claiming something is contaminated or interfered with not commit an offence?

A

When they make the claim in good faith