Criminal Damage Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Criminal Damage Act 1971 s1(1)

A

Simple Criminal Damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Simple Criminal Damage AR

A

1) Destruction or damage – Anything which incurs cost to rectify (Hardman)
2) of property
3) belonging to another – Defined in s10(2)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Simple Criminal Damage MR

A

1) Defendant intends or is reckless as to destruction or damage
2) Defendant knows or is reckless as to whether the property belongs to another – Defendant lacks mens rea if they have an honest (not necessarily reasonable) belief that property belongs to him (R v Smith)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Criminal Damage Act 1971 s5(2)(a)

A

Lawful Excuse defence to simple criminal damage:

1) Defendant believes he has the consent of the person who is, or he believes is, entitled to give permission for the damage, or
2) Defendant believes that the person who is, or he believes is, entitled to give permission for the damage would consent to the damage if they were aware of the circumstances and the damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Criminal Damage Act 1971 s5(2)(b)

A

Lawful Excuse defence to simple criminal damage:

1) Defendant believed property (his own or another’s) was in immediate need of protection; and
2) He believed the means of protection adopted was reasonable in the circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Jaggard v Dickinson

A

CDA 1971 s5(2)(a) can be relied on in cases where defendant has an honest but mistaken belief that they have the consent of the owner, even where the mistake extends from voluntary intoxication

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

R v Denton

A

CDA 1971 s5(2)(a) can be relied on even where the intent of the damage was fraudulent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Hunt

A

CDA 1971 s5(2)(b) can only be relied on in cases where the means of protection adopted is capable of protecting the property

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Hill and Hall

A

CDA 1971 s5(2)(b) can only be relied on in cases where the property is in immediate need of protection

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Criminal Damage Act 1971 s1(2)

A

Aggravated Criminal Damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Aggravated Criminal Damage AR

A

AR:

1) Destruction or Damage (Hardman definition)
2) Of any property, whether belonging to another or to the defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Aggravated Criminal Damage MR

A

1) Intention or recklessness to the destruction or damage
2) Intention or recklessness to the endangerment of life by the destruction or damage – This must be foreseen as a result of the damage not of the act itself (R v Steer)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

R v Steer

A

For aggravated CD, endangerment of life must be foreseen as a result of the damage not of the act itself

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Dudley

A

Whether or not any life is actually endangered is not relevant to a charge of aggravated criminal damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Criminal Damage Act 1971 s1(3)

A

Where fire is involved, criminal damage offences are charged as simple arson (ss1(1) and 1(3)) or aggravated arson (ss1(2) and 1(3))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly