Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Law > Criminal Cases > Flashcards

Criminal Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
MBE flashcards MPRE flashcards Civil Procedure 1L flashcards
1
Q

Which case establishes factual cause?

A

R v Pagett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Which case establishes legal cause?

A

R v Kimsey

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Which case establishes intervening acts?

A

R v Pagett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which case explores a victims own unreasonable act breaking the chain of causation?

A

R v Kennedy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case explores state of affairs and absolute liability?

A

R v Larsonneur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Which case explores omissions?

A

R v Gibbins and Procter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Which case explores transferred malice?

A

R v Gnango

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which case explores malice aforethought?

A

R v Cunningham

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case explores oblique intent/foresight of consequences?

A

R v Woollin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case shows you cannot kill someone who is dead?

A

R v White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Which case explores abnormality in mental functioning?

A

R v Byrne

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Which case explores what substantially impairs means?

A

R v Lloyd

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Which case explores how D’s mental state provides explanation for their actions?

A

R v Gold

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Which case shows intoxication alone cannot be a defense for murder?

A

R v Dowds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Which case shows ADS to be a recognised medical condition?

A

R v Woods

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Which case shows that D must intend to commit the unlawful act?

A

DPP v Newbury and Jones

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Which case shows the unlawful act must be a crime?

A

R v Lamb

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Which case shows that an unlawful act cannot be a civil wrong?

A

R v Franklin

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Which case shows that an unlawful act cannot be an omission?

A

R v Lowe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Which case establishes the objective test for a dangerous act?

A

R v Church

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Which case explores the definition of “some harm”

A

R v JM and SM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Which case outlines the criteria for loss of control?

A

R v Jewell

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Which case shows that D must fear violence from V against themselves or another identified person?

A

R v Ward

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Which case shows that the “things said or done” must be extremely grave?

A

R v Zebedee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Which case shows that sexual infidelity cannot be a qualifying trigger?

A

R v Dawes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Which case shows that voluntary intoxication must not be taken into account in loss of control?

A

R v Asmelash

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What case forms the basis of the defence of insanity?

A

R v M’Naghten

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Which case shows defect of reason? (insanity)

A

R v Clarke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

Which case outlines disease of the mind? (insanity)

A

R v Kemp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

Which case shows an internal factor? (insanity)

A

R v Quick

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Which case shows not knowing nature and quality? (insanity)

A

R v Oye

32
Q

Which case shows not knowing something is legally wrong? (insanity)

A

R v Windle

33
Q

Which case defines Automatism?

A

Bratty

34
Q

Which case shows an external cause? (automatism)

A

Hay v Butterworth

35
Q

Which case shows that it must be no fault of the defendant? (automatism)

A

Attorney General’s ref no.2 of 1992

36
Q

Which case shows that an automatic state caused by drink or illegal drugs is recklessness?

A

R v Coley

37
Q

Which case shows that not knowing your actions will lead to an automatic state is pure automatism?

A

R v Hardie

38
Q

Which case defined gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Broughton

39
Q

Which case shows the mens rea for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Bateman

40
Q

Which case shows the principles of the actus reus for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Adomako

41
Q

Which case shows duty of care for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Litchfield

42
Q

Which case shows a breach of duty for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Evans

43
Q

Which case shows “serious and obvious risk of death” for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Rose

44
Q

Which case shows the risk must be reasonably foreseeable for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Rudling

45
Q

Which case shows there must be “more than minimal” negligence for gross negligence manslaughter?

A

R v Broughton

46
Q

Which case defined technical assault?

A

R v Nelson

47
Q

Which case shows the mens rea for technical assault?

A

R v Light

48
Q

Which case shows that verbal cues can show there will be no technical assault?

A

Tuberville v Savage

49
Q

Which case shows the actus reus for technical assault?

A

Smith v CS of Woking Police Station

50
Q

Which case defined battery?

A

R v Ireland

51
Q

Which case shows the mens rea for battery?

A

DPP v Santana-Bermudez

52
Q

Which case shows battery can be through act or omission?

A

DPP v K

53
Q

Which case shows unlawful force? (battery)

A

A v UK

54
Q

Which case shows the mens rea for S47 ABH?

A

R v Roberts

55
Q

Which case shows the actus reus for S47 ABH and defines ABH?

A

Miller

56
Q

Which case defined GBH?

A

DPP v Smith

57
Q

Which case defines what “inflict” means?

A

R v Lewis

58
Q

Which case shows the mens rea for S20 GBH?

A

R v Cunningham

59
Q

Which case defined “intent” and shows it’s needed for the mens rea of S18 GBH?

A

R v Morrison

60
Q

Which case defines “appropriation” for theft?

A

R v Vinall

61
Q

Which case shows knowledge cannot be property?

A

Oxford V Moss

62
Q

Which case shows “belonging to another” for theft?

A

R v Webster

63
Q

Which case shows misguided consent in theft?

A

Lawrence v Comm Met Police

64
Q

Which case shows gift giving obtained through dishonesty is theft?

A

R v Hinks

65
Q

Which case shows when appropriation take place?

A

R v Atakpu and Abrahams

66
Q

Which case shows “under obligation” for theft?

A

R v Hall

67
Q

Which case shows what it means to be in possession of or control for theft?

A

R v Turner

68
Q

Which case shows what to do if you receive items by mistake in theft?

A

R v Webster

69
Q

Which case shows “dishonesty” in theft?

A

R v Barton and Booth

70
Q

Which case shows that if D thought the theft was okay, it cannot be theft?

A

R v Small

71
Q

Which case shows “intent to permanently deprive?

A

R v Velumyl

72
Q

Which case shows conditional intent? (theft)

A

R v Easom

73
Q

Which case shows you need a completed theft for robbery?

A

R v Waters

74
Q

Which case shows you must use force for a robbery?

A

R v Clouden

75
Q

Which case shows seeking to put fear of force is enough for robbery?

A

B and R v DPP

76
Q

Which case shows force must “facilitate” a theft for robbery?

A

R v Lockley

77
Q

Which case shows the amount of force used for robbery may not be substantial?

A

R v Clouden

Law (5 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions