CRIMINAL Flashcards

1
Q

Summary Only Offences

A
  1. Assault
  2. Battery
  3. Simple criminal damage (£5000 or less)
  4. Attempt of SCD (£5000 or less)
  5. Low-value shoplifting (£200 or less)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Either-way offences

INDICTABLE

A
  1. Theft (and any shoplifting above £200)
  2. Burglary
  3. Fraud (by false representation, abuse of position, failing to disclose)
  4. Assault occasioning ABH
  5. S20 OAPA GBH (basic intent)
  6. Simple criminal damage (above £5000)
  7. Simple Arson
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Indictable only offences

A
  1. Robbery
  2. S18 OAPA (specific intent)
  3. Aggravated arson
  4. Aggravated burglary
  5. Murder (or voluntary manslaughter)
  6. Involuntary manslaughter (unlawful act manslaughter or manslaughter by gross negligence)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Murder

AR & MR

Sentence

A

INDICTABLE ONLY

AR:
- unlawful
- killing
- human being
- (under) king’s peace

MR:
- malice aforethought
- intention to kill or to cause grievous bodily harm
(intent to killed or impose GBH)

Sentence:
Mandatory life imprisonment.
(Judge has no discretion unless recommending min.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Voluntary Manslaughter

A

AR & MR same with murder
BUT
partial defences available: loss of control or diminished responsibility

Murder mandatory sentence will be reduced.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

LOSS OF CONTROL LIMITATIONS

A

1- considered/planned desire for revenge
(ie. there is clear evidence of planning, D had time to think about the qualifying trigger)

2- excuse to use violence (it’s not enough that D° started the violence, it should be an excuse to impose deadly violence)

3- sexual infidelity
(exemption to sexual infidelity exception occurs if:
- was not the primary reason but in the background, should not be sole trigger so that jury has the whole story.
- there hasn’t been a SI, someone lied/made it up to taunt D°
- SI has not taken place yet)

4- attempted murder (cannot apply loss of control defence to attempt of murder)

5- addiction to alcohol/drugs
(D’s drug or alcohol addiction can be taken into consideration when assessing the magnitude of the qualifying trigger if D was taunted about the addition.
Addition will be a characteristic given to a normal person BUT the normal person will still have normal levels of tolerance and self-restraint and be sober)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Burden of proof for voluntary manslaughter defences

A

1- PROSECUTION proves beyond reasonable doubt when LOSS OF CONTROL defence is raised.

2- DEFENCE proves on the balance of probabilities that the DIMINISHED RESPONSIBILITY defence applies.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

BASIC CRIMINAL DAMAGE

A

Summary if (value £5000 or less), either-way if more.
- damage or destroy
- property
- belonging to another
- without lawful excuse
- basic intent (intention or recklessness)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sentence for basic criminal damage

A

Summary offence up to £5k damage/destruction – up to
3 months imprisonment & fine

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

BASIC ARSON

A

Either way.
- damage or destroy by fire
- property
- belonging to another
- without lawful excuse
- basic intent (intention or recklessness)

sentence: up to life imprisonment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Damage

For basic CD/arson

A
  • need not be permanent
  • time, money and effort needed to restore = damage
  • can be restored back to its original state without money or mark/stain =/= damage
  • permanent or temporary impairment of value or usefulness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Recklessness test (R v G)

A
  • accused was subjectively aware of a risk at the time of committing the AR
  • in the circumstances known to the accused, it was objectively unreasonable for the accused to take that risk.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly