Crimes Against The Person Flashcards

1
Q

Homicide

A

Homicide is the killing of a person. Murder, manslaughter, defensive homicide, infanticide and child homicide are unlawful homicides.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Murder

A

Murder is the unlawful killing of another person with malice aforethought, by a person who is of the age of discretion (10 years old and over) and of sound mind. The maximum penalty for murder is imprisonment for life.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Malice aforethought

A

Malice aforethought is the intention to commit the crime (a guilty mind or ‘mens rea’). For malice aforethought to exist, the accused must have acted voluntarily and have one of the following states of mind.
An intention to kill
An intention to inflict serious injury
Reckless indifference
an intention to assault a person who was trying to make a lawful arrest, which resulted in that person’s death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Reckless indifference

A

Recklessness is when the accused knows it is probable (highly likely) that their actions will either cause death or a really serious injury to another person, and they are indifferent to this fact. For example, a person would know that deliberately:

high-rise building is highly likely to cause
really serious injury or death

likely to cause really serious injury or death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Unintentional killing in the process of committing a violent crime

A

A person who has no intention to kill, but does kill in the process of committing a violent crime (which is punishable by imprisonment of 10 years or more) is liable to be convicted of murder, as though he or she had killed that person intentionally.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Causation

A

In respect of an offence of murder or manslaughter, the accused’s act must have caused the victim’s death. There must be an unbroken link (referred to as a causal link or causal chain) between the act of the accused and the death of the victim. If the accused shoots the victim and the victim falls down and dies as a result of the gunshot, then there is a clear, unbroken link between the act of the accused and the death of the victim.
If something intervenes to break that link, then the accused may not be found guilty of the murder of the accused, but could be charged with a lesser crime, for example assault.
It is unnecessary for the act of the accused to be the sole cause of death for it to be murder, but the act of the accused must have contributed ‘significantly’ to the death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Example of a break in the casual link

A

In respect of an offence of murder or manslaughter, the accused’s act must have caused the victim’s death. There must be an unbroken link (referred to as a causal link or causal chain) between the act of the accused and the death of the victim. If the accused shoots the victim and the victim falls down and dies as a result of the gunshot, then there is a clear, unbroken link between the act of the accused and the death of the victim.
If something intervenes to break that link, then the accused may not be found guilty of the murder of the accused, but could be charged with a lesser crime, for example assault.
It is unnecessary for the act of the accused to be the sole cause of death for it to be murder, but the act of the accused must have contributed ‘significantly’ to the death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Taking the victim as you find them

A

It is a general principle that an offender must ‘take their victim as they find them’. If the victim dies as a result of an injury inflicted by the offender because of an unexpected vulnerability (such as recovering from a head operation), the causal link is not broken by the vulnerability. The offender will be seen to have caused the death of the victim and therefore be liable for the charge of murder, if malice aforethought exists, or manslaughter.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Crimes against the person include

A

murder, attempted murder, manslaughter, culpable driving, rape, assault and kidnapping.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Attempted murder

A

a person who attempts to commit a serious crime is guilty of the indictable offence of attempting to commit that offence. For example, if a person plans a murder and their attempt fails, then he or she can still be charged with attempted murder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Survivor of suicide pact who kills deceased party

A

If two or more people enter into a suicide pact, and one person dies but another does not, the accused (the survivor) can be found not guilty of murder but guilty of manslaughter. The court must be satisfied, on the balance of probabilities, that the act was done or the omission made as part of a suicide pact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Conspiracy to murder

A

A person can be charged with conspiracy to murder if he or she agrees with any other person that a course of conduct should be carried out that will involve the commission of murder (or any other offence). To be guilty of a conspiracy offence the accused must have every intention of committing the offence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Manslaughter

A

Manslaughter applies in situations where death occurs as the result of criminal negligence or an unlawful and dangerous act.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Criminal negligence

A

The accused must owe the victim a duty of care. The accused’s actions (or inaction) must fall below the expected standard of care that a reasonable person would have exercise in the same situation, and this lack of care resulted in a person’s death. For example, it would be considered criminal negligence if a parent neglects to get medical treatment for a child when a reasonable person could have
foreseen that without treatment the child was likely to die

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Unlawful and dangerous act

A

The actions of the accused were unlawful and so dangerous that a reasonable person in the same circumstances, would have realised that it was highly likely a person would die or be seriously injured. For example, a person who throws bricks at a passing car to scare the driver may not have known or intended that such action would result in death.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Defensive homicide

A

The police may charge a person with the crime of defensive homicide, or a court may find a person not guilty of murder but guilty of defensive homicide, if the accused thought he or she was acting in self- defence but the court found the beliefs or actions of the accused were unreasonable. For a person to be found guilty of defensive homicide rather than murder, the accused must believe their actions were necessary to protect themselves or another person from the threat of death or a really serious injury.

17
Q

Infanticide

A

Infanticide is where a mother kills a child (under two years of age) in circumstances that would ordinarily be murder but for the fact that she has a mental condition caused by the effects of that child’s birth.
The police may charge a mother with infanticide or a woman can plead infanticide as a partial defence to murder.

18
Q

Child homicide

A

a person who kills a child who is under the age of six years, in circumstances that would normally be called manslaughter, is guilty of the offence of child homicide.

19
Q

Culpable driving causing death

A

A person can be found guilty of culpable driving causing death if that person was responsible for the death of another road user while driving a motor vehicle. The prosecution must prove that the driver was doing one of the following:driving recklessly, driving negligently,

20
Q

Driving recklessly

A

that is, consciously and unjustifiably disregarding a substantial risk that the
death of another person or the infliction of grievous bodily harm on another person may result (for
example, driving at high speed in adverse road conditions)

21
Q

Driving negligently

A

that is, failing to a gross degree to observe a reasonable standard of care (this includes driving while fatigued to such an extent that the driver ought to have known that there was a risk of falling asleep)

22
Q

Dangerous driving causing death

A

A person who drives a motor vehicle at a speed or in a manner that is dangerous to the public and thereby causes the death of another person is guilty of an indictable offence.
A person can be found not guilty of culpable driving but guilty of the lesser offence of dangerous driving causing death.

23
Q

Dangerous driving causing serious injury

A

In cases where serious injury rather than death is the outcome of dangerous driving, the offender can be charged with dangerous driving causing serious injury. The maximum penalty for this is five years in prison.

24
Q

Rape

A

Rape is sexual penetration without consent or forcing others to penetrate the offender or another person. This includes penetration of the vagina, mouth or anus of another person and includes penetration with a penis, another part of the body or an object.

25
Q

Consent

A

Consent means free agreement. Consent is saying yes to the penetration.

26
Q

Child pornography

A

it is illegal to make or possess child pornography or to invite a minor (a person under 18 years) to be involved in the making of pornography.
Child pornography means a film, photograph, publication or computer game that describes or depicts a person who is, or appears to be, a minor engaging in sexual activity or depicted in an indecent sexual manner or context.

27
Q

Indecent assault

A

Indecent assault is a sexual act other than sexual penetration. Maximum penalty is 10 years’ imprisonment.

28
Q

Procuring sexual penetration of a child under 16

A

Crimes out, encourage or persuade a child under 16 to engage in sexual penetration or indecent assault.

29
Q

Assualt

A

It involves the direct or indirect application of force by a person to the body, clothing or equipment of another person, where the application of force is:
• without lawful excuse, and
• intentional or reckless and results in bodily injury, pain, discomfort, damage, insult or deprivation
of liberty.

30
Q

Intentionally or recklessly causing serious injury

A

A person who, without lawful excuse, intentionally or recklessly causes serious injury to another person is guilty of an indictable offence. Serious injury includes a combination of injuries.
The penalty for intentionally causing serious injury could be up to 20 years in prison and recklessly causing serious injury could be up to 15 years.

31
Q

Intentionally or recklessly causing injury in circumstances of gross violence

A

A person must not, without lawful excuse, intentionally or recklessly cause serious injury to another person in circumstances of gross violence.
The maximum penalty for intentionally causing serious injury is 20 years in prison and 15 years for recklessly.

32
Q

Stalking

A

It is an offence to engage in stalking. The maximum penalty for stalking is 10 years in prison. Stalking includes:
• following the victim
• contacting the victim

33
Q

Kidnapping or blackmail

A

Under the Crimes Act 1958 (Vic.) a person can be found guilty of kidnapping if he or she:
• detains another with the intention of demanding payment or a ransom for the release of the person
• detains another with the intention of gaining an advantage (of any sort) even if no demand or
threat is made.
Section 82 of the Crimes Act also makes it an offence to engage in blackmail. Blackmail is when a person makes unwarranted, menacing demands or threats with the intention of obtaining some personal gain or causing loss to another.
The maximum penalty for kidnapping is 25 years in prison and 15 years for blackmail.