Crimes Against Life Flashcards

1
Q

Murder

What is Murder?

A

The unlawful and intentional causing of death of another living human being
-‘Causing of death’ is much wider than ‘killing’ bc it can be a direct and active act or it can even be an inaction/omission

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Murder

What are the 4 major elements of murder?

A

o Causing the death
o Of a person
o Unlawfully
o and intentionally

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Murder

What are the facts of the Compos case regarding murder?

A
  • A baby was diagnosed with batter baby syndrome. Social services were called upon to
    intervene in this situation but they cleared the parents (meaning that the parents were not in trouble for battering their baby).
    -A few months after being cleared, the baby died.
    According to the facts of the case, the spine of baby was broken. The mom alleged that the baby couldn’t breathe so the mom bent the baby backwards which ‘accidently’ broke the baby’s spine
    -The pathologists said that a spine can only break this way in car crash or plane crash
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Murder

What did the court in th Compos case state regarding the crime of murder?

A

-The trial court sentenced the mom to 15 years prison for murder bc she should have foreseen that eventually the baby will die based on the abuse it was suffering.
- “should have foreseen” does NOT speak to intention. However, intention is an essential element of murder. For this reason, the accused appealed and said that for murder to be the charge there has to be intention.
-Therefore, the SCA reduced her sentence to culpable homicide (7 years imprisonment)
-Culpable homicide is based on negligence. Murder is based on intention.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Murder

What did teh court state in the Nkuna decision regarding the crime of murder?

A

**-Legal question: can someone be found guilty of murder when there is no deceased body that can be found? **
Facts: A policewoman went missing. There was evidence to convict her boyfriend. The court held that you can charge someone with murder even if no body can be found,
provided that there is enough circumstantial evidence based on public policy
-When there is no body, the circumstantial evidence must have probative force to warrant a conviction, there must be no ground for reasonable doubt, and there must be a reasonable explanation as to why the body cannot be found
-Therefore, the court convicted the accused of murder even though the deceased’s body was missing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Murder

What did the PM case state regarding the difference between* planned and premeditated murder?*

A

o Premeditated → deliberately rationalising and calculating the likelihood of success of the murder and getting away with it
o Planned murder → planning a murder strategy in advance to achieve a goal
The purpose of this ruling is to show us that planned/premeditated murder is methodical, well thought out, and carried out not only to kill the victim, but to also ‘get away with it’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Murder Elements

How does the 1st element of murder: causing the death operate?

A

-The killing/causing of death must be a voluntary positive act or omission
-The act/omission must be the factual and legal cause of the death
Moment of death:
* Traditional test = cardio-pulmonary test (collapse of the heart or lungs)
* Modern test = Brain stem death vs neo-cortical death
▪ Brain stem death → Williams case
▪ Also called clinical death> The brain cells have died and no brain activity
Neo-cortical death → Clarke v Hurst case
▪ Also called social death → there is no emotional cognition but the body is still working albeit in a permanent vegetative state.

> Moment of deat depends on the context also by taking into account the social/legal/cultural issues

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Murder Elements

How does the 2nd element of Murder: Another Human Being operate?

A

Grotjohn case:
o Facts: there was a married couple. The wife was paralysed and asked her husband to kill her bc she was unhappy. The husband felt trapped but he handed her a gun and then she shot herself.
o The husband was charged with murder even though he didn’t pull the trigger
o Court held: suicide or attempted suicide is not a crime However, instigating suicide or assisting another person to commit suicide is a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Murder Elements

What is infanticide and how does it operate as the 2nd element of murder?

2nd Element Another person

A

**o Infanticide = causing the death of an infant **
o sec 113 of the General Law Amendment Act provides
▪ Disposing of a child with the intent of concealing its birth – it does not matter whether the child died before, during, or after birth. When a baby is born (dead or alive) you have to register its birth or else you are committing an offence

▪ Disposing of a child’s dead body without a lawful burial order. This means that when a baby dies, you have to register its death. If you don’t, then you will be guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Murder Elements

What did the Molefe case state regarding the crime of infanticide?

A
  • Not murder, but a statutory offence for failing to register a stillborn child or achild who died shortly after birth in accordance with the Birth and Death Registry
  • Conviction was set aside (essential elements were absent)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Murder Elements

How does the 3rd element of murder: Intention operate?

A

-An act of killing does not constitute murder if intention is absent
-If intention is absent, then the act of killing amounts to culpable homicide
-A subjective test (inferred from objective facts) is applied in order to test for intention
-Intention is present when there is an awareness of the unlawfulness of the act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Murder Elements

How does unlawfulness operate as the 4th element of murder?

A

Robinson case:
-whether the intentional and unlawful taking of a man’s life, at his own request, renders the killers less blameworthy and so constitutes extenuating circumstances?
-* Consent does not exclude criminal responsibility of the accused BUT is considered to be an extenuating circumstance
* CANNOT consent to one’s own murder contra bones mores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Murder Elements

What did the **Nkwanyana **case state regarding unlawfulness as an elemnt of murder?

A

The deceased asked the accused to kill her because she failed in all her suicide attempts. He reluctantly agreed and then killed her+confessed to the crime
-Court held: the punishment should fit both the criminal and the crime. Punishment should
be fair to the accused and to society, and should be blended with a measure of mercy
-The court found it fit to extend mercy to the accused in this case → he was thus given a suspended sentence (meaning he was released)
The court considered the noble intentions of the accused. But the current position in our law still remains that this is the unlawful killing of another person
-consent is irrelevant for the purposes of conviction, but consent can be found to be an extenuating circumstanc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Murder

What did the court in the Agliotti case state regarding the Euthanasia and assisted suicide as acrime of murder?

A

Court held: it remains the position in our law that you cannot assist someone to commit suicide despite them requesting it and despite your noble intentions. Anyone who does this or even conspires about it is guilty of an offence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Murder

What is assisted suicide?

A

> Occurs when a person having emotional
problems or stress requests another person to
kill him by any means
The person is still the direct cause of their own
death
Intentionally killing oneself with the assistance
of another person who provides the means,
knowledge, or both
Not limited to medical procedures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Murder

What is euthanasia?

A

-Occurs within the medical or patient world when a terminally ill patient asks a medical practitioner to help him out of his misery by administering to him a fatal dose of medication or poison to end his life
-A medical practitioner (or someone under their direction) is the direct cause of the death
-Intentionally killing oneself with the assistance of a medical practitioner or person acting under theirdirection, who provides the knowledge, means, or both

17
Q

Murder

What are the definitional elements of euthanasia?

A

unlawful,intentional, termination of life of a patient , by a physician or someone under a physician’s direction, at the patient’s request - for compassionate reasons

18
Q

Murder

What is the difference between voluntary, non-voluntart and involuntary euthanasia?

A

1.Voluntary
-= euthanasia performed in accordance with the wishes of a competent individual
2.Non-Voluntary
=euthanasia performed without the knowledge of the wishes expressed by a competent person through a valid advance directive
3.Involuntary
=euthanasia performed against the wishes expressed by a competent person or through a valid advance or directive

19
Q

Murder

What is the difference between active and passive Euthanasia?

A

Active Euthanasia
- the unlawful and intentional causing of death of another human being through a direct action, at the request of that person
Since another person is the direct cause of death
→ active euthanasia is unlawful (even if it is
voluntary)

Passive Euthanasia
-= hastening the death of a person by withdrawing some form of life sustaining support and letting nature take its course
Since a disease/condition is the direct cause of death → passive euthanasia is lawful

20
Q

Murder

What did the Hartman case state regarding active Euthanasia?

A

Facts: The son was a doctor. He transferred his sick dad to another hospital. The dad asked his son to kill him bc he was sick. The son obliged by asking the nurse to administer lots of drugs to him. She obliged. The son then administered even more. He then injected the dad
with a lethal substance. Then the dad died
-Court held: voluntary active euthanasia remains an unlawful act. The accused does not evade criminal liability. Due to extenuating circumstances, he did not receive a sentence.

21
Q

Murder

What did the Clarke v Hurst case state regarding passive euthanasia?

A

Facts: The deceased had cancer and a heart attack which. He was put on a feeding tube. His will stated that he did not want to be kept alive artificially. 4 years after his coma,
his wife applied to court to withdraw his medical treatment Her application was opposed.
- Legal question: will the removal of the tube be the factual/direct cause of death? Would such removal be unlawful in the light of the boni mores?
- Yes, removing the tube would be the factual cause of the death. However, it would not be the legal cause of death based on policy considerations
- o The curator persona must act in the best interests of the person. In this case, the prosecution could not show that Clarke’s wife was not acting in the best interests of
her husband.
o Passive voluntary euthanasia is lawful

22
Q

What did the Stransham-Ford case state regarding Euthanasia?

A

Facts: there was a lawyer who was terminally ill with stage 4 cancer and he applied to the
court to request voluntary active euthanasia (for a medical practitioner to inject him with a
lethal substance).

-The applicant applied for a court order on an urgent basis and the court granted the order bc he only had a few weeks left tolive.However, 2 hours before granting the order, the patient died of natural causes

-the current position (regarding passive voluntary euthanasia) remains as the lawful position

23
Q

Culpable Homicide

What is culpable homicide?

A

Culpable homicide = the unlawful negligent causing of the death of another person

24
Q

Culpable Homicide

What did the **Burger **case state regarding culpable homicide?

A

Legal question: would a reasonable person have foreseen the possibility of death? → we
must ask this every time we deal with culpable homicide - -
The court set out what constitutes a reasonable person → Nothing exceptional or
extraordinary is needed to be a reasonable person, just common sense.

This case provides us with the test for a reasonable person and whether or not someone has deviated from the conduct of a reasonable person to be found criminally negligent

25
Q

Culpable Homicide

What did the Naidoo case state regrading the difference between culpable homiced and murder?

A

Similarities:
o Both are crimes against life
o Both are materially defined crimes (consequential crimes)
o Both are crimes where causation is unlawful
Point on which they differ → fault:
o Culpable homicide deals with negligence
o Murder deals with intention

26
Q

Culpable Homicide

Can murder and culpable homicide overlap according to the Humphrey’s+Ngubane cases?

A

**Ngubane: **
o The court oddly said that they cannot overlap but they can co-exist → we are very critical of this view so that is why we read the case with the Humphreys decision

**Humpfreys: **
o The court said that culpable homicide and murder do NOT overlap. The crime is
either one or the other.
o The court gave a practical application of luxuria → there was a foreseeability of death but the person did NOT reconcile themselves with that outcome
o Contributory negligence is NOT recognised in SA law

27
Q

Culpable Homicide

What did the Nkwenja case state regarding culpable homicide?

A

Nkwenja case: → common purpose / participation -
Facts: 2 people attacked 2 other people sitting in the car. They robbed the people but applied too much force, resulting in death. - -
Court held: both accused persons were found guilty of culpable homicide based on the doctrine of common purpose
Main point: you can be found guilty of culpable homicide based on common purpose / participation

28
Q

Culpable Homicide

What did the **Ndlanzi **case state regarding culpable Homicide?

A

Ndlanzi case: → attempted culpable homicide -
Legal question: is there such thing as attempted culpable homicide? → NO - - -
Attempt requires intention
One cannot attempt to be negligent → you cannot consciously/intentionally attempt to act a