crimes Flashcards

1
Q

crimes against persons

A

1) battery
2) assault
3) aggravated assault
4) homicide
5) False imprisonment
6) Kidnapping

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

battery

A

unlawful application of force to the person resulting in either

1) bodily injury or
1) offensive touching
- does not need to be intentional can be criminal negligence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what type of mens rea is required for battery under CL

A

general intent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

assault

A

1) an attempt to commit battery OR

2) intentional creation of a REASONABLE APPREHENSION OF IMMINENT bodily harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

aggravated assault

A

an assault plus one of following

1) use of a deadly or dangerous weapon or
2) with intent to rape, mayhem or murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

homicide (murder)

A

1) unlawful killing of
2) another HUMAN with
3) MALICE AFORETHOUGHT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

when is there malice aforethought for murder

A

1) intent to kill
2) intent to inflict great bodily harm (second degree)
3) intent to commit a felony (felony murder rule)
4) reckless DISREGARD to an unjustifiable high risk to human life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

elements for homicide (murder)

A

1) murder) unlawful killing of another human with malice aforethought
2) actual causation and
3) proximate causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

proximate causation rule

A

D is responsible for all results that occur as a NATURAL AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCE of his conduct, even if not anticipate the exact manner which they would occur

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what is required for 1st degree murder

A

PREMEDITATED KILLING

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how to determine premeditated killing

A

D must have acted either with

1) intent or
2) knowledge that his conduct would cause death

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is general rule for felony murder rule for 1st degree murder

A

ANY KILLING- even an accidental killing that is committed during a felony is 1st degree murder
(usually inherently dangerous crime, robbery)
- must be a separate felony than the killing
- deaths must be foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

defenses to felony murder for 1st degree murder

A

if a D has any defense to underlying felony, then has defense to felony murder .

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is the rule for deaths caused while feeling during a felony murder rule for 1st degree

A

deaths caused while fleeing from felony are felony murder. BUT once D reaches a TEMPORALLY safety, deaths caused after are not felony murder

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

when is fleeing during a felony murder end the felony murder rule for 1st degree murder?

A

when the D reaches a temporally safety

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

is the D liable for the death of a co-felon as a result of resistance of a victim or police during the felony murder for 1st degree murder?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

requirements for 1st degree murder for homicide of a police officer

A

1) d MUST know that victim is a cop AND
2) victim must be ACTING IN LINE OF DUTY
- can happen even if off duty but acting in line of duty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

what is second degree murder sometimes called

A

deprived heart killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

rule for second degree murder

A

killing done with

1) RECKLESS DISREGARD to an unjustifiable high risk to human life OR
2) murders that are not classified as 1st degree (ex: premeditated killings, felony murder)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

different types of manslaughter

A

1) voluntary
2) imperfect defense
3) involuntary

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

voluntary manslaughter

A

1) killing in the heat of passion resulting from an ADEQUATE PROVIATION OF VICTIM
2) the provocation must be one that would arouse sudden and intense passion in the MIND OF THE ORDINARY person such to cause him to lose self-control
3) there must have been NOT ENOUGH TIME between the provaction and the killing for a passion of a reasonable person to cool down and
4) D did not cool off b/w provocation and killing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

what type of provocation must it be for voluntary manslaughter

A

would that ordinary person would find

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

what is the imperfect- self defense for murder?

A

if D has an

1) honest but
2) unreasonable belief that his life was in imminent danger, this defense will reduce a murder to manslaughter

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

what is involuntary manslaughter

A

killing of

1) CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE OR
2) misdemeanor manslaughter- killing someone while committing a misdemeanor or an unnumerated felony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
what is the rule for false imprisonment
1) unlawful confinement of a person | 2) w/o valid consent
26
is there false imprisonment if there is a KNOWN alternate route that the victim knows?
NO.
27
kidnapping rule
confinement of a person with either 1) some movement OR 2) concealment of a secrete place
28
what is rape
slightest penetration completes rape
29
what type of crime is statutory rape
strict scrutiny meaning | - Consent of victim is not a defense and mistake of fact is not a defense
30
crimes of property
1) larceny 2) embezzlement 3) false pretenses 4) robbery 5) extortion 6) forgery
31
larceny rule CL
1) wrongful taking 2) carrying away (asportation) 3) of property of another by 4) trespass with 5) intent to permanently deprive
32
how much movement needs to happen for larceny?
slightest movement
33
when must the intent to permanently deprive owner of property be in larceny?
1) AT TIME OF TAKING
34
can a person be guilty of larceny when they did not have intent to permanently deprive at the time of taking but later after the taking?
YES. if decide later to keep the property (under continuing theory of trespass)
35
if someone believes that the property is theirs is there larceny?
NO. taking property in the belief that it is yours (or that you have a right to it) is NOT CL larceny
36
what is the difference b/w larceny and embezzlement
embezzlement the person is in LAWFUL possession
37
embezzlement
fraudulent conversion of property of another
38
what must be required for embezzlement
must have LAWFUL POSSESSION
39
does the embezzler need to get a benefit for embezzlement?
NO does not need to get the benefit
40
false pretenses rule
D persuades the owner of property to convey title by false pretenses (false representation)
41
what is the main thing for false pretenses?
conveyances of title
42
is a false promise to do something in the future false pretense?
NO. cannot be grounds for liability
43
can the false representation in false pretenses be a present or past fact?
Yes
44
what is the different b/w larceny by trick and false pretension
Larceny by trick: only POSSESSION of the property is obtained False Pretense: TITLE is obtained
45
robbery for CL
1) taking of personal property of another 2) in the persons presence by 3) FORCE or THREAT OF force 4) with intent to permanently deprive him of it.
46
how is the presence requirement for robbery defined
very broadly. can be a farmer tied in a barn while taking things a home
47
what type of threat does it need to be for robbery
IMMINENT
48
what is the simulated deadly weapon?
when a person does not actually have a weapon but looks like it, can be armed robbery
49
extortion
knowingly seeking to obtain property or services by means of a FUTURE threat
50
difference b/w robbery and extortion
extortion: dont have to take anything in presence of person. FUTURE threats Robbery: IMMINENT threats
51
forgery
making or alternating a false writing with intent to defraud
52
what does forgery apply to
any writing that has APPARENT LEGAL SIGNIFICANCE | ex: wills, check, insurance
53
burglary rule CL
1) breaking and 2) entering 3) dwelling house of another 4) at night 5) with intent to commit a felony therein
54
how can the breaking requirement be for burglary?
actual (some force) or constructive
55
is there a breaking for burglary if coming through uninvited through a WIDE OPEN WINDOW OR door?
NO
56
is there a breaking for burglary if someone pushes an interior door to the bedroom or living room?
YES
57
what is constructive breaking for burglary?
by fraud or threat | ex: using key for not intended purposes
58
what is the entering requirement for burglary
occurs when ANY part of the body crosses into the house
59
dwelling house of another requirement for burglary
cannot be a barn or commercial structure. person must live there
60
when must a burglary occur at CL
NIGHT only
61
when must the requirement to intent to commit a felony therein occur for burglary?
AT THE TIME OF THE BREAKING AND ENTRY
62
arson
1) burning of the | 2) dwelling of another
63
what is the intent requirement for arson
MALICE | Reckless disregard of an obvious risk that the structure would burn will be enough
64
does arson apply to smoke damage
NO only burning.
65
is scorching sufficient for arson?
NO but charring is sufficient
66
for CL what does of building does it have to be for arson?
dwelling of ANOTHER. Not bard or commercial buildings
67
at CL could a person be convicted of arson for burning their OWN home
NO. needed to be dwelling of another
68
under the continuing trespass situation for larceny, if the original taking was not wrongful and she later decides to keep it, is this larceny?
NO. - if the original taking was NOT WRONGFUL (eg took the umbrella thinking it was hers) and she later decides to keep it, it is not larceny.
69
4 ways to show malice aforethought
1) intent to kill 2) intent to cause serious bodily harm 3) reckless disregard to unjustifiable risk to human life 4) felony murder
70
2 ways to show voluntary manslaughter cases (adequate provocation)
1) finding spouse in bed with another | 2) physically assaulted by person
71
different homicide cases
1) murder 2) voluntary manslaughter 3) involuntary manslaughter 4) misdemeanor manslaughter
72
what is required for attempt
1) specific intent to commit the crime | 2) need a substantial step, mere preparation not enough
73
conspiracy rules
1) CL: agreement b/w 2 or more persons to commit crim ML: agreement b/w 2 or more persons to commit crime and overt act 2) all crimes committed in furtherance of conspiracy 3) can withdraw from furtherance crimes if voluntary and communicate withdraw to other conspirators 4) conspiracy and the underline crime can be charged with both
74
difference b/w larceny and embezzlement
larceny: if a low level employee with limited control of property embezzlement: high level of employee with control of high amount of time
75
for specific intent crimes defenses
1) if mistake and not intend, does not matter if reasonable or not 2) voluntary intoxication is a defense
76
stuff for malice crimes
1) mental state of intent or recklessness 2) mistake must be reasonable 3) voluntary intoxication is not a defense
77
reckless stuff for crimes
1) intent or recklessness 2) mistake must be reasonable 3) voluntary intoxication is not a defense
78
does doctrine of transferred intent apply to attempt?
NO because must have the specific intent to cause the underlying crime and take a substantial step towards that crime
79
what does conspiracy require
1) an agreement b/w 2 or more persons 2) intent to enter into an agreement and 3) an intent to achieve an UNLAWFUL objective of the agreement
80
what is the majority rule for conspiracy for unlawful objective. Do the parties need to know that thy are going to commit an illegal plan?
NO. Majority rule is that the parties to a conspiracy need not have been aware that their plan was an illegal one. - Minority of courts: conspirators must have known that their objective was criminal unless the crime was (corrupt motive)