Crime Syllabus 15 Flashcards

1
Q

CJA 2003

Bad character - WHAT

A
s. 98
Evidence of misconduct
Disposition towards misconduct
Reputation of misconduct
NOT Offence charged
NOT Misconduct = Investigation; Prosecution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Bad character

Misconduct - WHAT

A

Offence

Reprehensible behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Bad Character

Offence - TYPES

A
Cross admissibility (Multiple counts)
Relevant allegation
Cautions
Prosecution + Acquitted
Convictions = Circumstances; Certificate; Witness (Confirm)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

CJA 2003

(D) Admissibility

A

s. 101

Evidence of bad character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Admissibility gateways

Defendant

A

s. 101 (1)
(a) Agree
(b) (D) Evidence
(c) Important explanatory evidence
(d) Important matter in issue
(e) (Co-D) matter OR ‘Cut-throat defence’
(f) (D) False impression
(g) (D) Attacked other character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Exclusion gateways

Defendant

A

s. 101 (3)
(d) Important matter in issue
(g) (D) Attacked other character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Exclusion application

TEST

A

Evidence adverse effect,
on the fairness of proceedings,
that it ought NOT be admitted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (b) - Tactical

A
Explain defence
Explain NO Good direction
Attack other character = (P) Exposure
Remove other offences
Seek Favour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (c) - Required

A

Substantial value
Necessary to establish offence
Impossible to understand evidence
Unless = Other evidence available

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (c) - Evidence

A

Statement of facts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (d) - Matter WHAT

A

Matter = Propensity

  1. Offend / (D) Capability OR Guilt
  2. Untruthful / (D) Credibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (d) - Required

A
Substantial importance (NOT trivial)
Relevant = Context of case
CL = Balance (Probative value; Prejudicial effect)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (d) - NOT Trivial

A

More than marginal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Propensity

Offence - CASE

A

R v Hanson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Propensity

Offence - TEST

A

History establish propensity
More likely offence
NOT Unjust OR Unfair

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Propensity

Offence - Factors

A

(D) Identified
Category = Similarities OR Dissimilarities
Number
Time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Propensity

Untruthful - TEST

A

Dishonesty is an element

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Propensity

Untruthful - TYPES

A

Fraud
Perjury
Disbelieved testimony

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Convictions

Defendant - Required

A

Certificate of conviction / acquittal = Offence; Sentence; Signed
Foreign = UK Offence (time); Standards of fairness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Convictions

NON Defendant - Required

A

Important matter in issue
Substantial importance (NOT trivial)
Relevant = Context of case
Discretion of court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (d) - Evidence

A
Cross admissibility (Multiple counts)
Relevant allegation
Cautions
Prosecution + Acquitted
Convictions = Circumstances; Certificate; Witness (Confirm)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (e) - WHAT

A

(D) Undermine = (CO-D) Defence OR Witness

(aka) ‘Cut-throat defence’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (e) - Required

A
Important matter in issue
Substantial importance (NOT trivial)
Relevant = Context of case
CL = Balance (Probative value; Prejudicial effect)
24
Q

Admissibility gateways

101 (1) (e) - Evidence

A

Prove OR Disprove = Fact; Propensity (Capability OR Credibility)

25
Admissibility gateways | 101 (1) (f) - WHAT
False OR Misleading impression | NOT withdrawn
26
Admissibility gateways | 101 (1) (f) - WHEN
Assertion by Defendant OR (D) Witness Police caution + questioning Evidence ‘in proceedings’
27
Admissibility gateways | 101 (1) (f) - Evidence
``` ONLY Necessary (no more) Rebut impression ```
28
Admissibility gateways | 101 (1) (g) - WHAT
Misconduct Offence Reprehensible behaviour
29
Admissibility gateways | 101 (1) (g) - WHEN
Assertion by (D) OR Counsel Police caution + questioning Evidence ‘in proceedings’
30
Admissibility gateways | 101 (1) (g) - Evidence
``` ONLY Necessary (no more) Rebut attack ```
31
Bad Character | Exceptions
Unjust OR Unfair to allow CL = Balance (Probative value; Prejudicial effect) Court discretion
32
Contamination | Court power
Stop case = Acquit; Discharge + Retrial
33
CJA 2003 | NON (D) Admissibility
s. 100 | Evidence of bad character
34
Admissibility gateways | NON Defendant
s. 100 (1) (a) Important explanatory evidence (b) Substantial probative value (c) Agree
35
Admissibility gateways | 100 (1) (a) - Required
Substantial value Necessary to establish offence Impossible to understand evidence Unless = Other evidence available
36
Admissibility gateways | 100 (1) (b) - Required
``` Important matter in issue Substantial importance (NOT trivial) Relevant = Context of case CL = Balance (Probative value; Prejudicial effect) ```
37
Admissibility gateways | 100 (1) (b) - Evidence
Prove OR Disprove = Fact; Propensity (Capability OR Credibility)
38
Applications | Adduce - Required
Application WHAT = Misconduct evidence WHY = Admissible (Facts; Reasons) WHO = Serve notice (Court officer; Other parties)
39
Applications | Adduce - Time
``` (Non-D) = 14 days after disclosure (D) = (MC) 28 days after (D) pleads NOT guilty (D) = (CC) 14 days after (D) pleads NOT guilty ```
40
Applications | Oppose - Required
Application WHAT = Misconduct evidence WHY NOT Admissible (Facts disputed; Reasons; Unjust AND Unfair) WHO = Serve notice = Court officer; Other parties
41
Applications | Oppose - Time
Within 14 days = Notice to adduce misconduct
42
Applications | Vary application
Court powers = Time limit; Adjournment | Considerations = Reason; Interest of justice
MUST = Give reasons
43
Direction | Bad character - WHEN
ANY Case | Bad character evidence
44
Direction | Bad character - Summary
Danger undue reliance (BC) NOT Prejudice = Bolster weak case NOT Infer guilt = From propensity
45
Direction | Good character - CASE
R v Vye
46
Direction | Vye direction - LIMBS
Two Limbs = Propensity 1. Offend / (D) Capability OR Guilt 2. Untruthful / (D) Credibility
47
Direction | Vye direction - TYPES
(D) Testify = Capability AND Credibility | (D) NOT Testify = Capability ONLY
48
Direction | Vye direction - Purpose
``` Jury account (D) past Good behaviour = Less likely to offend Honesty = Less likely to lie ```
49
Good character | Considerations
(D) Application (D) Case = Crucial aspect Strength of evidence Just AND Fairness
50
Good character | Direction - TYPES
Absolute Modified Effective
51
Good character | Absolute - WHAT
NO Conviction / Caution
52
Good character | Modified - WHAT
NO Conviction / Caution | Bad character evidence
53
Good character | Modified - WHEN
Judge discretion NOT Beyond reasonable doubt NOT Absurd to give
54
Good character | Effective - WHAT
Previous Conviction / Caution
55
Good character | Effective - Factors
Circumstances Relevant = Category; Number; Time Fairness (ALL Parties)
56
Good character | Effective - WHEN
Judge discretion NOT Beyond reasonable doubt NOT Absurd to give
57
Good character | Failure
NOT Grounds for appeal | ONLY Facts of case