Crime and Punishment in 18th and 19th century Britain Flashcards

1
Q

Which crimes were most feared by the authorities in the period 1500-1700?

A

heresy, vagabondage and witchcraft.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Why did these old crimes of heresy, vagabondage and witchcraft change? Give three reasons.

A
  1. The religious uncertainty of the Reformation had passed - the last execution for heresy was in 1612.
  2. Wealth increased from 1700-1900. Therefore, fear of vagabondage decreased greatly.
  3. Most educated people, usually the ones responsible for judging cases of witchcraft, became less likely to believe these accusations.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What happened in 1736?

A

The witchcraft laws were finally repealed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which TYPES of crime became more of a worry to the authorities in the 18th and 19th centuries?

A

Crimes that threatened trade (such as highway robbery and smuggling), the interests of landowners (such as poaching) and the interests of employers (even such as joining trade unions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Was highway robbery a new crime?

A

No, it started during the chaos of the Civil War (1642-49).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Were these highwaymen gentlemen or brutal robbers?

A

They were ruthless and would think nothing of killing or maiming their victims to avoid being identified.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What factors explain the growth of highway robbery?

A

Some factors include:

More people travelling in their own coaches
Handguns were easier to obtain
Demobilised soldiers struggled to make an honest living
Horses became cheaper to buy - making it easier for robbers to ambush victims and then make quick getaways
No police force and local constables didn’t track criminals across county lines
Highwaymen could hide and sell their stolen loot in taverns
Bad roads meant coaches had to slow down

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What factors explain the rapid decline in highway robbery?

A

Better roads meant quicker and more frequent coaches
Mounted patrols were set up around London and high rewards given for information about highwaymen
JPs refused to license taverns used by highwaymen
Improvements in banking meant fewer people carried large amounts of money

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Define the 1723 Black Act.

A

This showed how seriously the authorities saw poaching: it made the hunting of deer, hare or rabbits a capital crime. Anyone found armed, disguised or with a blackened face was assumed to be poaching and could be executed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Who was and was not allowed to hunt legally?

A

Only landowners whose land was worth £100 a year could hunt - and they could hunt anywhere. Landowners with land worth less than £100 a year and their tenants could not hunt - even on their own land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the punishment for possessing dogs or snares?

A

£5 fine or three months in prison.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What effect did the harsh laws and use of gamekeepers have?

A

Some poachers became violent. For example - in 1786 a Staffordshire farm labourer horsewhipped a gamekeeper who tried to take his hare.

Also, villagers frequently gave alibis to protect poachers from conviction.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Was poaching financially rewarding?

A

It could be (although most people only poached in small amounts). For example, John Lightwood, who killed almost 80 hares in 1764 before selling them for 3 shillings a piece - more than he could possibly earn in his day job.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What happened in 1748?

A

The Duke of Richmond was asked to smash the smuggling gangs. 35 smugglers were hanged and a further 10 dies in gaol.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Did the Duke of Richmond’s actions ‘smash’ smuggling?

A

No. There were around 20,000 active smugglers - so it hardly had any impact.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What criteria could you use to explain why smuggling increased or continued to flourish?

A
  1. Fear of smugglers
  2. The attraction of smuggling
  3. Organised gangs
  4. Public attitudes
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How widespread was smuggling and how many smugglers were there?

A

Very widespread - but concentraqted around the coast. In 1748, 103 people were officially ‘wanted’ as smugglers - but there were probably closer to 20,000.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Who were the smugglers?

A

Over 70 percent were labourers. Fewer than 10 percent were small landowners. The rest were tradesmen, such as butchers and carpenters.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

How big was a smuggling gang?.

A

They could be 50 to 100 men strong. They were well armed and had little fear of the customs officers or the army.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What evidence suggests the scale of the problem?

A

For example, it was estimated that 3 million pounds weight of tea was smuggled into Britain each year.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

When was the French Revolution and why does this matter?

A

in 1789 - it matters because the authorities in Britain became terrified of the same thing happening here.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What were the authorities on the lookout for during the build up to the Tolpuddle Martyrs?

A

Any signs of conspiracy and for groups whose ideas they considered suspect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Why was life so hard for farm labourers in the Dorset village of Tolpuddle?

A

Because they had their weekly wage cut several times. When they asked for an increase, they were refused and then their wages were cut again!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Who led the farm labourers in asking for a wage increase?

A

A man called George Loveless.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

In 1833, after they had been refused a wage increase, what did the labourers of Tolpuddle do?

A

They set up a union - the Friendly Society of Agricultural Labourers.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

How did the Friendly Society of Agricultural Labourers (FSAL) admit into the union?

A

Each new member had to wear a blindfold and swear an oath of secrecy and support for the union.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

What happened after the FSAL was set up?

A

The farm owners found out (despite the oath of secrecy) and set about breaking the union up - they used a law originally intended for the Navy which said that swearing secret oaths was illegal because it could lead to mutiny.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What law did the authorities use to convict the Tolpuddle Martyrs?

A

The Unlawful Oaths Act 1797, an obscure law created in response to mutinies in the Navy, which prohibited the swearing of secret oaths. This showed how nervous the authorities were because they were changing laws to suit their own purposes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

What happened to the Tolpuddle Martyrs?

A

They were convicted and sentenced to 7 years’ transportation to Australia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

What happened to the Tolpuddle Martyrs after they had been transported to Australia?

A

There was widespread outcry at the sentence and there were protest marches attended by over 20,000 people and a petition that got 800,000 signatures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

Did the Tolpuddle Martyrs stay in Australia?

A

No, they all came back (within two years) and were pardoned.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What were the effects of the incident of the Tolpuddle Martyrs on the Trad Union movement?

A

The GNCTU was broken up and it was another 20 years before the trade union movement began to recover.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

What statistics can you give to demonstrate how population grew and moved into the urban centres in the 18th and 19th centuries?

A

1750 - c. 9.5 million people in England and Wales - mostly in villages scattered around the countryside.
By 1900 - 41.5 million - mainly concentrated in towns and cities.

34
Q

How did voting rights change in the same period?

A

`Mid 18th century - one in eight men had the vote.

By 1885 - nearly all men had the vote.

35
Q

What effect did most men having the vote by 1885 have on politics?

A

The government now had to win the votes of working men, so started to make improvements to housing and health.

36
Q

Why did harvests become less of a gamble by the 19th century?

A

Because food could be quickly and cheaply imported from other countries, so bad harvest were less likely to result in famine and starvation.

37
Q

How big were the changes in travel and transport in the 18th and 19th centuries?

A

Huge. For example, by the 1840s, railways had become a major form of travel. These were much faster than roads and gradually became cheaper so that ordinary people could use them.

38
Q

How did all the improvements and changes in population create opportunities for the government in the 19th century?

A

Two centuries of trade and industrial growth meant that the government could collect higher taxes to pay for reforms that would improve people’s lives.

39
Q

How did education change in the 18th and 19th centuries?

A

In the 18th century - a small minority attended school and literacy rates were low.

By 1850, 70 per cent of the population could read and write.

This rose to 95 per cent by 1900 - after a law that said all children must attend school until the age of 13.

40
Q

What were the new arguments about human nature?

A

Some people believed that improving people’s life chances through education and improving living and working conditions would produce better behaviour.

Other people started to twist the arguments of Charles Darwin (who had developed the theory of natural selection) to suggest that some people were inherently criminal - even less evolved than other people.

41
Q

When was the very first professional and full time police force set up?

A

1829

42
Q

Who was responsible for the first police force being set up?

A

Home Secretary Sir Robert Peel

43
Q

What two other things was Robert Peel famous for?

A
  1. He was a supporter of penal reform and wanted to make prisons the main form of punishment for serious crimes.
  2. He played a significant role in the abolition of the Bloody Code.
44
Q

Was Peel the first to try to improve policing in the capital?

A

No. Henry and John Fielding (brothers) were London magistrates who, after taking over at Bow Street Magistrate’s Court in 1748, realised that more men were needed on the streets to reduce crime.

45
Q

What did the Fielding brothers blame the rise in crime on?

A
  1. Breakdown in order as the population of London exploded

2. The bad example set by politicians

46
Q

What did the Fielding brothers do to stop highway robbery?

A

They introduced a horse patrol. This was clearly effective because it ended highway robbery around London and when it stopped, the robbery returned!

47
Q

Who were the Bow Street Runners?

A

These were a team of thief-takers who patrolled the streets of London in the evenings. They also investigated crimes and presented evidence in court.

48
Q

What was ‘The Hue and Cry’ as established by the Fielding brothers?

A

It was a newspaper that published information about criminals, crime and stolen goods.

49
Q

Was the Fielding publication ‘The Hue and Cry’ useful in reducing crime?

A

Yes. Magistrates and gaolers from around the country passed on details so the newspaper became like a national network of information.

50
Q

What did Peel’s 1829 police force replace?

A

The system of watchmen and parish constables.

51
Q

How many men did Peel’s force of 1829 have?

A

Around 3,200.

52
Q

How was the uniform designed?

A

It was designed to look civilian rather than military and officers remained unarmed to distinguish themselves from the army.

53
Q

Why was such an effort made to make Peel’s police force look different from the army?

A

In order to reduce public fear that the police might be used to limit their freedom

54
Q

When was Robert Peel appointed Home Secretary?

A

1822

55
Q

How did Peel persuade other politicians to follow his advice?

A

He made use of statistics to paint a picture of rising criminality. He was persuasive and reassured fellow politicians that a police force was no threat to freedom.

56
Q

Why had the government become more involved in people’s lives in the build up to the introduction of the first police force in 1829?

A

Because of the war against France (1803-1814) which forced the government to raise more money through taxation.

57
Q

What role did local government have in the creation of a new police force?

A

Local authorities were given powers to raise money to pay for a police force.

58
Q

Why was there an increased FEAR of crime?

A
  1. Publications, known as ‘penny dreadfuls’ made it seem like violent crime had increased massively.
  2. There was an actual increase in crime in the years following the French wars - because unemployment increased.
59
Q

Why was there an increased fear of protest?

A
  1. The French Revolution
  2. High food prices and unemployment led to an actual increase in large-scale protests.

Revolution seemed a real possibility.

60
Q

Why was London such a crime hot spot?

A

Overcrowding and inadequate policing (the old watchmen and parish constables).

61
Q

What happened in 1835?

A

A new law allowing towns to set up their own police force.

62
Q

What happened in 1839?

A

A new law allowing counties to set up their own police force. Also, The Bow Street Runners and other forces in London merged with the Metropolitan Police Force.

63
Q

What happened in 1842?

A

The Metropolitan Police force set up the first detective force to gather evidence, investigate and solve crimes after they had been committed.

64
Q

What happened in 1856?

A

It became compulsory for all towns and counties to set up police forces. By this time the police were regarded with respect rather than suspicion.

65
Q

What happened in 1870?

A

Police helmets introduced.

66
Q

What happened in 1878?

A

The Metropolitan Police detective force was reorganised into the Criminal Investigation Department (CID). Over the next few years, this was rolled out to the whole country.

67
Q

What happened by 1884?

A

39,000 police in Britain and over 200 separate forces.

68
Q

What’s the counter-intuitive thing about the Bloody Code?

A

It was introduced in the late 1600s when crime rates were falling and abolished in the 1820s and 1830s when the crime rate was rising!

69
Q

Key date in the abolition of the Bloody Code: 1789

A

Last woman burned for murdering her husband.

70
Q

Key date in the abolition of the Bloody Code: 1808

A

Sir Samuel Romilly gets a law passed that abolishes death penalty for pickpocketing.

71
Q

Key date in the abolition of the Bloody Code: 1820

A

Last beheading - of the Cato Street conspirators who had tried to assassinate the entire government.

72
Q

Key date in the abolition of the Bloody Code:

1820s - 1830s

A

Abolition of nearly all capital crimes.

73
Q

Key date in the abolition of the Bloody Code: 1841

A

Only murder and treason remain as capital crimes.

74
Q

Key date in the abolition of the Bloody Code: 1868

A

The last public hanging took place.

75
Q

Which individual was most responsible for the abolition of the Bloody Code and why?

A

Sir Robert Peel (Home Secretary in the 1820s). Peel made key contributions to penal reform and established the first full-time, professional police force.

76
Q

How did juries and the conviction rate contribute as a cause of the abolition of the Bloody Code in the 1820s-1830s?

A

Juries would not convict because the punishments were seen as unfair and out of proportion to the crime.

77
Q

What statistical evidence supports the argument that juries were not convicting because if the harshness of the punishments?

A

Even in the early 1700s only 40 per cent of those convicted of capital crimes were actually hanged. By the 1800s, this had fallen to 10 per cent, despite an overall increase in the crime rate.

78
Q

How did the unwillingness of courts to convict or punish capital crimes undermine the law?

A

Criminals felt more confident of escaping punishment and so were more likely to commit crimes. The Bloody Code was actually undermining the law and not protecting the property of the wealthy landowners and the middle class.

79
Q

How did public executions also contribute as a cause to the ending of the Bloody Code leading up to the 1820s and 1830s?

A

During the 1700s, crowds grew larger, partly because newspapers were advertising them more. Some factories even closed on execution day to allow workers to attend the cheap entertainment!

80
Q

Why was the popularity of public executions a problem and a cause for the end of the Bloody Code?

A

Because the large crowds made it harder to keep order and also presented an ideal opportunity for pickpockets to ply their trade. There was always the possibility of a criminal escaping if the crowd were sympathetic or felt them to be innocent. There was also an increased risk of protest riots - especially if there were mass hangings and the offenders had been sentenced to death for minor or social crimes.