Crime and gender Flashcards
in 2021, 79% of the individuals dealt with by the CJS were
male
Over 95% of prisoners in the UK
are male
98% of offenders of sexual offences are
male
men commit around 85%-90%
of serious indictable offences
Men are about
- 60x more likely to be convicted of sex offences
- 14x more likely to be convicted of robbery
- 13x more likely to convicted for possession of weapons
- 10x more likely to be convicted of public order offences
- 8x more likely to be convicted of violence
- 7x more likely to be convicted of criminal damage
- 4x more likely to be convicted of theft
Why women appear to commit less crime: Women commit less detectable offences
- women tend to commit offences like shoplifting which are less likely to be detected and reported
- theft from shops is the most common offence for women
- although men do most shoplifting, women tend to steal smaller, less detectable items like clothing, groceries, health products, perfumes etc whereas men tend to steal larger, higher value items like electronics and power tools
Why women appear to commit less crime: Sex-role theory and gender socialisation
- associated with functionalism (eg Parsons conjugal roles) and the New Right
- women are socialised into ‘expressive’ roles involving caring for people, housework etc, encouraging them to adopt ‘feminine’ characteristics such as being emotional less competitive, less tough, less aggressive and more averse to risks
- this makes them less likely to commit crime because they avoid risk-taking and they also have fewer opportunities to commit crime
Why women appear to commit less crime: Control theory and rational choice and opportunity in a patriarchal society
- Carlen (1998) and Heidensohn (1996) combine a feminist approach with functionalist control and rational choice and opportunity theories (eg Hirschi) to explain women’s lower level of offedning
- Heidensohn suggests that differences between male and female crimes arise from social circumstances, opportunities, the socialisation process and the different impacts of informal and social control in a patriarchal society
Why women appear to commit less crime: The gender deal and the class deal
- Carlen (1988) - after a study of a small number of WC women with criminal convictions, she suggested that women are encouraged to conform by the class deal and the gender deal
- most women accept these rewards and therefore conform
- some women can’t access these rewards (eg due to poverty, unemployment, lack of family, abusive partners etc) and then may make a rational decision to choose crime as they have little to lose and crime offers benefits like money, food and goods which are unavailable through the approved class and gender deal
Carlen - the class deal and the gender deal
- the class deal refers to the material rewards that arise from paid work, enabling women to purchase consumer goods and enjoy a respectable life and home
- the gender deal refers to rewards which arise from fulfilling their expressive role in the family, with material and emotional support from a male breadwinner
Why women appear to commit less crime: the constraints of socialisation
- Heidensohn (1996) - women, in a patriarchal society, have more to lose if they are involved in crime due to stigma or shame
- Carlen - women are socialised into performing a role as ‘guardians of domestic morality’ and they risk social disapproval when they fail to do so
- women who risk involving themselves in crime risk the double jeopardy of being condemned for both committing a crime and behaving in an unfeminine way - unlike a ‘proper woman’
Why women appear to commit less crime: social control and different spheres
- Heidensohn suggests there is a patriarchal ideology of different spheres, with men dominating the public sphere, where most crime is committed including workplaces, pubs etc, whereas women are more limited to the private sphere of the home
- social control deters women from crime in 3 ways, by putting greater pressure on women to conform and giving them greater risks of losing more than they might gain, as well as reducing opportunity to commit crime:
1 - in the private domestic sphere of the home, patriarchal control through the allocation of domestic labour and childcare to women provides less time and opportunity for crime, and women face more serious consequences, as well as more supervision of teenage girls than boys
2 - in the public sphere - women face patriarchal controls such as fear of violence, harassment and supervision in the workplace etc, restricting their opportunity to deviate. Also, the ‘glass ceiling’ stops women from accessing the top levels in careers, restricting opportunities for white collar crime
3 - women face more threat to their reputation if they are deviant eg through labels like ‘slag’ and the condemnation of their lack of femininity
Why women appear to commit less crime: Pollak (1950) - The chivalry thesis
suggests that the male-dominated criminal justice system, such as the police and the courts, takes a more benevolent, protective and patriarchal view of female offending, meaning that women offenders are seen as ‘less guilty’ as they are more vulnerable and in need of protection, and are therefore treated more leniently than men
Evidence for Pollak’s chivalry thesis
- Home Office/Ministry of Justice - women are consistently treated more leniently by the law
- female first offenders about half as likely to given an immediate prison sentence
- women are less likely to be remanded in custody, and are more likely to receive suspended or community sentences, or receive a shorter prison sentence
- female offenders are generally regarded as a less serious threat by the police, so their offences may be treated in a more informal way, eg through cautions or warnings rather than being charged, particularly for minor offences
Evidence against Pollak’s chivalry thesis
- women tend to display more ‘mitigating factors’ eg remorse, caring responsibilities etc which make a shorter sentence more likely
- Walklate (2004) points out that women commit less serious crimes
- Heidensohn (1996) - serious crimes by women risk harsher punishments due to double jeopardy
- Carlen (1988) - double jeopardy is reflected in women’s sentences as judges, magistrates and juries assess women offenders in terms of their character and performance in the traditional female role