Crime And Deviance - Theories Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Name the 3 functionalist theorists of crime

A

Parsons, Durkheim and Hirschi

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Explain Parsons theory

A

Society is a system that has to meet and fulfil certain needs( functional pre-requisites)
The sick role can de-stabilise society and you should just accept when you are ill.
He sees the medical profession as important because it stops illegitimate illness and stabilises society.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What are society’s 4 functional pre-requisites?(AGIL)

A

Adaption
Goal achievement
Integrate
Latency(socialisation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Explain Durkheim’s theory

A

Crime can benefit society.

Anomie occurs when too much deviance occurs, leading to society shutting down.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Name the 5 ways crime benefits society

A
Being a warning device
Social cohesion
Adaption
Reaffirming boundaries
Role allocation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Explain Hirschi’s theory

A

He argues people commit crimes when attachments society is weakened.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are Hirschi’s 4 crucial bonds

A

Belief
Involvement
Commitment
Attachment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Evaluate Durkheim’s theory

A
\+ Looks at both dimensions of crime, both the good and bad of society.
\+ Scientific approach
- Too deterministic
- Difficult to measure anomie 
-Teleological
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Evaluate Parsons theory

A

+ Macro and scientific approach
+ Recognises society works well most the time
- Deterministic and simplistic
-Teleological

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evaluate Hirschi’s theory

A

+ Looks at why people don’t commit crime
+ Scientific approach
- Too deterministic —> not everyone not bound to society will commit crime
- Too subjective to measure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Name the 4 functionalist subculture theorists

A

Ak Cohen
Cloward and Ohlin
Miller
Merton

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Explain Merton’s strain theory

A

Merton argued people suffer from anomie. This is a strain between the goals set by society and the legitimate means of achieving them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the 5 responses to anomie

A

Retreatism - give up on goals of society
Ritualism - give up on goals, but confirms to means of achieving them
Rebel - makes new goals
Innovator - illegitimate shortcut to achieve goals
Conformist - continue trying to achieve goals of society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain Ak Cohen’s theory

A

Crime is from status frustration when an individual is denied status in society.
This leads to them rejecting mainstream norms and goals and they create their own criminal goals to gain respect from other WC males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Explain Cloward and Ohlin’s theory

A

They look at the different subcultural forms in the illegitimate opportunity structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain the 3 stages of the illegitimate opportunity structure

A

Criminal - The top of the ladder, they will often run the gang by working their way up
Conflict - Usually go round in gangs and often turn to violence to defend their part of land
Retreatist - An individual response that usually leads to alcohol or drugs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Explain Miller’s theory

A

Miller argues that they never accepted the norms and goals of society to begin with, but instead they are socialised into working class goals. These are focal concerns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Outline the 5 focal concerns

FaTEST

A

Fatalism - The belief that nothing can be done with their lives and they can’t change this.
Toughness - Concern for masculinity to maintain respect from other WC males.
Excitement - Seeking for cheap thrills
Smartness - Having street smarts to outwit others
Trouble - Looking for violence with other WC males

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluate Merton’s theory

A

+ Explains deviance arising in society

  • Too reliant on statistics (argued by interpretivists)
  • Too deterministic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Evaluate Ak Cohen’s theory

A

+Helps explain WC delinquency
+Links to Nike identity
- Only Looks at WC boys
- Miller would say its inevitable they wouldn’t achieve working class values

21
Q

Evaluate Cloward and Ohlin’s theory

A

+ Recognises the lower in the legitimate world the more likely to go into illegitimate world
- Doesn’t recognise people can drift in between these structures

22
Q

Evaluate Miller’s theory

A

+ Looks at new values being cultural and not structural
+ Sugarman’s research backs this up
- Stereotypical in representing WC
- Ethnocentric as it looks from white middle class perspective
Symbolically violent as its looking down on working class

23
Q

Define primary deviance

A

The act of being deviant

24
Q

Define secondary deviance

A

The reaction to the deviant behaviour

25
Q

Define Master status

A

A label that overwrites any other label you have

26
Q

Define Self concept

A

How you see yourself

27
Q

Define Self-fulfilling prophecy

A

When you are a label and you act the way of the label

28
Q

Define Deviant career

A

When people who have been labelled can’t achieve conventional goals and continue commuting deviant acts

29
Q

Define deviant subculture

A

A group of people who do deviant acts more often

30
Q

Summarise critical criminology

A

Subcultures are a product of seeing through the system.
They are a conscious act of deviance
Those in subcultures fight the system
They want to put in place counter-hegemony

31
Q

Evaluate critical criminology

A

+ Paul Willis’ study shows evidence they go into subcultures to fight the system

  • Romanticising criminality
  • Victimise criminals by saying it’s the systems fault
32
Q

Summarise left realism

A

Three causes of subcultures are:
• Relative deprivation - feel poor
• Marginalisation- feeling left out of society
• pull to subculture - to overcome first 2

They believe that if we tackle relative deprivation and marginalisation it will stop subcultures

33
Q

Evaluate left-realism

A

+ Influential over new labour policies
+ Explains why ethnic minorities are in subcultures
- Hard to operationalise and measure
- Deterministic that if you feel these ways you will go into subculture

34
Q

Summarise right realism

A

They go into subcultures because they think they can get away with it
There are 3 causes of subculture crime:
• Biological differences - not socialised right
• Socialisation and underclass - welfare state leads to cultural dependency
• Cost Benefit analysis - if they think they can get away with the crime they will
Should take zero tolerance approach on crime

35
Q

Summarise right realism

A

+ Evidence zero tolerance approach works - worked in New York

  • Controversial in suggesting biological differences lead to crime
  • Zero tolerance approach could just move crime to somewhere else
36
Q

Explain the classical Marxist theory

A

The criminal justice system punished the powerless more than the powerful
They believe:
• Capitalism is criminogenic
• There is selective law enforcement
• The working class is ideologically conditioned

37
Q

What are classical Marxists thoughts on white collar crime

A

It may not be illegal but it will be immoral
It usually includes one of: negligence, exploitation, manipulation and diffuse victimisation
White collar crime costs the UK £14 billion a year

38
Q

Explain the neo-Marxist theory

A

They believe crimes that are committed are a conscious act
They take a structuration approach
They believe we have free will and we determine if we commit crime

39
Q

Evaluate the neo-Marxist theory

A

+ They are not Deterministic as they believe it’s the persons choice

  • Feminists argue there is no coverage of the power of patriarchy
  • Traditional Marxists would argue new criminology stayed too far from Marxist tradition
40
Q

Explain Becker’s theory

A

He looks at moral entrepreneurs/ crusaders. These are people who have the power to enforce laws and label people.
He looks at master status, this is a label that overrides all other labels
Deviant careers come from a self fulfilling prophecy that leads to a career of criminality

41
Q

Explain Stan Cohen’s theory

A

Looks at folk devils, these are people who are labelled and society take their anger out on
Moral panics are panics that are blown out of proportion

42
Q

Explain Jock Young’s theory

A

Looks at primary and secondary deviance. And deviant subcultures, who are are group who go against society’s norms.
Looked at marijuana smokers in Notting Hill and the overreaction of police

43
Q

Explain cicourel’s theory

A

Looks at typifications, especially by police and this leads to distorted statistics in crime. They will stereotype white middle class and Afro Carrabean boys.

44
Q

Evaluate Becker’s theory

A

+ Looks at abuse of power, Marxists would use this for evidence

  • Too deterministic
  • Subjective research
45
Q

Evaluate Stan Cohen’s theory

A

+ Evidence that moral panics are still here today

  • McRobbie and Thornton says the term moral panic is outdated
  • Concepts are subjective
46
Q

Evaluate Young’s theory

A

+ Influential over left realist research

  • Deterministic in the fact if you act a certain way it depend mean you have to behave a certain way
  • Victimises criminal
47
Q

Evaluate cicourel’s theory

A

+ Evidence shows that he’s correct police label (Rainer)
+ Shows crime statistics are skewed
- Subjective so cant be measured
- Outdated as police are more professional now

48
Q

What are the 3 explanations of crime according to post-modernism

A
  • Transgressive approach to explaining crime - Can’t explain why crime happens
  • Individualisation of crime - each different person has different motives
  • Crime as reaction against diversity - hate crime has increased as diversity increased
49
Q

Evaluate post modernism

A
\+ Recognises crime is not only structural 
\+ Explains non-utilitarian crime
- Doesnt look enough into structural reasons
- Underestimates issues such as class inequality