Crime And Deviance : Globalisation, Green Crime, Human Rights And State Crime Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is globalisation caused by?

A

Mass migration

Mass tourism

Increase in transnational companies which manufacture goods globally

Removal of trade barriers allowing companies to sell and manufacture goods in many countries

Spread of new media

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Has globalisation actually happened? And if it has, is it a positive or negative thing?

A

Hyperglobalists - globalisation IS happening and is broadly a good thing: this is a process that is making society better

Pessimistic globalists - globalisation IS happening but it is a negative feature of society. They believe that globalisation is largely westernization / cultural imperialism leading to a homogeneous global society, that destroys local cultures

Traditionalists - unconvinced that globalisation is really happening.

Postmodernists - globalisation is a significant feature of society. It has a huge impact on crime - because crime itself is becoming increasingly global and the effects of globalisation have knock-on effects on criminality.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The Global Criminal Economy

A

Held et al - there has been a globalisation of crime
= an increasing interconnectedness of crime across borders

The same processes that have brought the globalisation of legal activities have done the same with illegal activities
= this HAS LED TO the spread of transnational organised crime

Castells - there is now a global criminal economy worth over £1 trillion per annum

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Transnational Organised Crime (TOC)

A

The international illegal drug trade:
- World Drug Report 2007 - this trade was worth $322 billion each year(higher than the GDP in 88% of the countries in the world)

Money-laundering:
- Deregulation of global financial markets / banking secrecy has made it possible to launder dirty money
- Hard to track due to technology

Human-trafficking:
- Organ trafficking / prostitution / forced labour
- National Crime Agency (2014) = 13,000 people in Britain were victims of slavery
- Closely related to the smuggling of illegal immigrants into countries where they are forced to work

Cyber-crime:
- Glocal
- Detica - cyber crime costs the UK £27 billion each year

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The Global Criminal Economy - drugs

A

Drug supply is linked to globalisation process – Third World drugs-producing countries such as Colombia and Afghanistan have large populations of impoverished people

Drug harvesting is an attractive option for them – little investment in technology + commands high prices

In Colombia, 20% of the population depends on cocaine production for their livelihood

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Transnational Organised Crime - Farr

A

Farr- there are 2 main forms of global criminal networks

  1. Established mafias: e.g. Italian-American mafia, the Japanese Yakusa. Long established groups who use globalisation to create new opportunities
  2. Newer organized crime groups: emerged since globalisation. Collapse of communism in Eastern Europe in 1980s and 1990s important. New groups include Russian, E.European and Albanian criminal groups, drug cartels around the world
    = Connect with the established mafias to form transnational organized crime
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

McMafia

A

Glenny - how transnational organised crime mirrors the activities of legal transnational corporations like McDonald’s
= instead of burgers, they’re selling DRUGS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did the McMafia come about

A

Under communism, the Soviet state had regulated the prices of everything

After the fall of communism, the Russian gov deregulated most of the economy except for natural resources such as oil
= these remained at their old prices

So, anyone with access to funds – such as former communist officials and KGB (secret service) generals – could buy oil, gas, diamonds etc for basically nothing
= and then they could sell them abroad at an massive profit
= these people became Russia’s new capitalist class (Oligarchs)

Capitalists hired ‘mafias’ to move their money/products of out the country

Criminal organisations were vital to the entry of the new Russian capitalist class in the world economy.

Russian mafias were able to build links with criminal organisations with other parts in the world.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Glocalism meaning

And an AO2 example

A

Hobbs - the interconnectivity between the local and the global, with transnational crime rooted in local contexts
– local contexts with global links

AO2: Winlow’s study of the bouncers in Sunderland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How has globalisation affected crime? 6 ways

A

The spread of capitalism and growing inequality

Supply and demand in a globalised world

More opportunities for crime

Cultural globalisation and the ideology of consumerism

Growing individualisation

Global risk society

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - the spread of capitalism and growing inequality

For the poor

A

Taylor - globalisation has allowed TNCs to manufacture in low wage countries, producing job insecurity, unemployment and poverty
= Causes the poor and marginalised to commit
crime. Lack of opportunity drives the unemployed to look for illegitimate ones such as the drugs trade

Marketisation has encouraged people to see themselves as
individual consumers - undermines social cohesion.

Left realists - materialistic culture promoted by global media portrays success in terms of a lifestyle of consumption.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - the spread of capitalism and growing inequality

For the rich

A

Taylor - globalisation creates criminal opportunities for elite groups
= deregulation of financial markets creates opportunity for movement of funds across the globe to avoid taxation.

Globalisation has led to new patterns of employment – created new opportunities for crime:
- People being employed for less than minimum wage
- People working in breach of health and safety or other labour laws

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Evaluation of Taylor’s argument (for how the spread of capitalism and growing inequality has affected crime)

A

Strength:
Useful in linking global trends in the capitalist economy to changes in the patterns of crime.

Pessimistic globalists – this is an example of cultural imperialism

Weaknesses:
Does not adequately explain how these changes make people behave in criminal ways. For example, not all the poor turn to crime (deterministic)

Traditionalists - globalisation isn’t really happening
= crimes have always existed, and new technology has always changed the nature of crime to some extent (like gunpowder); but nothing significant or new is happening today.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - supply and demand in a globalised world

A

Immigration has become harder – created a market in illegal human-trafficking
=illegal immigrants can be forced into slavery, or women are forced into prostitution

Large scale of transnational organised crime is due to the demand for its products in the West
= but the global criminal economy can’t function without a supply that provides the drugs etc that is demanded in the West

This supply is linked to the globalisation process – Third World drugs-producing countries such as Colombia and Afghanistan have large populations of impoverished people

Drug cultivation is an attractive option for them
– little investment in technology + commands high prices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - more opportunities for crime

A

New means of carrying out crime EG internet

Dark web - little risk of detection for criminals

Crimes committed in one country can be conducted in another - impossible to be caught

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - cultural globalisation and ideology of consumerism

A

Westernised lifestyle promoted in a media-saturated society
(pessimistic globalists)

Social inclusion but economic exclusion (Left Realism)

Young (LR) - the bulimic society we live in forces people to turn to crime (relative deprivation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - growing individualisation

A

Bauman - people can no longer rely on the welfare state to protect them from unemployment / poverty

Individualisation and global consumer ideology puts personal gain above community benefit

New crimes combined with growing individualisation provide individuals with a means of achieving reward which are
otherwise unobtainable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

How has globalisation affected crime - global risk society

A

Globalization adds to the uncertainty of life in our society
– Beck argues it generates a ‘global risk society’

People become more ‘risk conscious’
– fearful of things like losing their jobs, their identities stolen, fearful of immigrants

The media plays on these fears
– moral panics about gun crime, terrorist threats, growing social disorder caused by ‘scroungers’

These can fuel hate crimes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Evaluation of crime and globalisation

A

Strengths:
Study of globalization is relevant, contemporary and helps to put new crimes into perspective

Weaknesses:
Secretive and complex nature makes it hard to investigate

Secondary sources like reliable stats are not always available
= validity

Much crime is committed in local communities by local offenders, rather than being influenced by globalisation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What is green crime - traditional criminology POV

Advantages / disadvantages

A

By definition, breaking environmental law. They are interest with regulations concerning the environment

Advantage - it has a clearly defined subject matter

Disadvantage - they simply accept the definitions of environmental crime, which are shaped by powerful groups

Disadvantage - the same environmental crime may be illegal in some countries and legal in others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What is green crime - green criminology POV

A

(More radical)

White - green crime is ANY action that harms the environment, regardless of whether a law has been broken

Involves zemiology - study of harms

Legal definitions cannot provide a consistent / universal standard of harm
= moving away from legal definitions allow green criminologists to develop a ‘global perspective’

Similar to Marxists - powerful groups define in their own interests what is considered unacceptable environmental harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Evaluation of green criminology

A

Strength:
Recognises the growing environmental concerns and the need to address the harms of the environment

Weaknesses:
Difficulty of categorisation - focusing on “harm” is too broad

The question of whether harm has been caused becomes a political / moral judgement rather than value free research
= EG animal cruelty - some not ALL G.criminologists would say eating meat is wrong

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Green crime

Two views of harm

A

White

Anthropocentric (human-centred view)
This view assumes humans have the right to dominate nature for their own benefit
Adopted by nation-states and TNCs

Eco-centric
This view sees humans and their environment as interdependent, so environmental harm hurts humans too
Adopted by green criminologists

24
Q

Primary and secondary green crimes

A

Two types of crime argued by South (green criminologist)

Primary green crime:
Direct harm done to the environment

Secondary green crime:
Crime that grows out of defying rules aimed at preventing environmental disasters

25
Q

Examples of primary green crime

A

Air pollution - burning fossil fuels adds 3 billion tons of carbon into the atmosphere every year

Deforestation

Species decline - 50 species a day become extinct

Water pollution - half a billion people lack access to drinking water

26
Q

Volkswagen emissions scandal 2015

A

11 million vehicles were tampered with to cheat emissions tests

Breached environmental regulations

Company was responsible for nearly 1m tonnes of extra air pollution every year

27
Q

Bhopal disaster 1984

A

Chemical company Union Carbide leaked poisonous gas

Affected 500,000 people

25,000 deaths

Birth defects in children

28
Q

How does the Bhopal disaster illustrate both the traditional criminological approach and the green criminological approach?

A

traditional criminological approach - the disaster arose because Union Carbide broke local health and safety laws

green criminological approach - Union Carbide deliberately located plants in countries where health and safety laws were weak and there was less concern for the environment

29
Q

Types of secondary green crime

A

State violence against oppositional groups - EG french secret service blew up the Greenpeace ship in New Zealand
= the ship was trying to prevent the french testing of nuclear weapons

Hazardous waste and organised crime - 2004 tsunami where barrels of radioactive waste was illegally dumped by European companies on Somalian shores

30
Q

Global risk society - beck

A

Globalisation is important to green crime

While some environmental crimes are local when committed, many cross national borders (eg pollution)

Global warming EG - affects whole world

We have created manufactured risks - through technology and science

31
Q

Who commits green crime + who argues this

A
  1. Individuals
  2. Private business organisations
  3. States and governments
  4. Organised crime
32
Q

Who are the victims of green crime

A

More likely of WC background or from a minority ethnic group - both developed and undeveloped countries

Potter: there is ‘environmental racism’: those who suffer the worse effects are a different ethnicity than those causing the damage

33
Q

Enforcement action against green crimes

A

Governments create and enforce laws that control green crime BUT they often form policies with businesses who are main offenders

AO2 SL - Snider = states are reluctant to pass laws against pollution etc. as they may lose funding

May be pressured to pass them due to pressure groups (Greenpeace)

34
Q

Who / what do Marxists blame for green crime

A

They blame capitalism

The aim of governments is to achieve economic growth though producing things
= companies are allowed to extract materials and pollute

Wolf - those in the developing world (poor, ethnic) who are most likely to face effects of environmental crime
= they can’t move from these areas (EG Bhopal disaster India)

35
Q

Contemporary issue - green criminology and fracking

What is it

What would green criminologists’ say about fracking

What would the anthropocentric view say about fracking

A

Fracking - extracting gas from underground

Green criminologist - environmental risk, dangerous

Anthropocentric - its good for jobs, and reducing imports

36
Q

Problems of researching green crimes

A

Different laws

Different definitions

Difficulties in measurement

37
Q

2 reasons for why state crime is the most serious form of crime

A
  1. The scale of state crime - large scale crimes with widespread victimisation
  2. The state is the source of law - states define what is criminal, so they can conceal crime and avoid punishment. They can ignore the intervention of external authorities (like the EU) or international conventions
38
Q

Examples of state crime - the torture and illegal treatment of citizens

A

Gaddafi regime in Libya - overthrown in 2011

UK in 1970s used white noise to torture IRA suspects

UK paid £14mil in compensation to Iraqis who were illegally tortured

39
Q

Examples of state crime - corruption

A

Organised stealing of money EG Egyptian dictator Mubarak - embezzled money

40
Q

Examples of state crime - assassination

A

Mahmoud al-Mabhouh - hamas commander killed in 2010 in Dubai

41
Q

Examples of state crime - genocide

A

Holocaust

Rwanda genocide 1994

42
Q

Examples of state crime - state sponsored terrorism

A

(The state itself carrying our terrorist acts / supporting others doing it)

US supported illegal rebel groups against elected regimes EG in central and South America

HSBC

43
Q

Examples of state crime - war crimes

A

Israel and deliberately targeting civilians in Palestine

UK against Iraq and Afghanistan

44
Q

2 problems with defining state crimes

A
  1. Hard to define what a state crime is
    - the state is a source of law, so defines what a crime is
    - it has the power to avoid defining its own acts as criminal (EG Nazi persecution of the Jews was permitted under German law)
  2. Even if states commit evidently illegal acts under international law, they have the power to decriminalise / justify these offences
45
Q

Transgressive approach to the definition of state crime

A

Schwendinger and Schwendinger / Green and Ward suggest state crimes should be considered as violations of human rights

46
Q

What are the different definitions of state crime?

A

Domestic law

Social harms and zemiology (a transgressive approach)

Labelling and societal reaction

International law

Human rights (transgressive approach)

47
Q

What are the different definitions of state crime - domestic law

A

Chambliss - state crime are acts defined by law as criminal and committed by state officials

However, using state explanation of crime ignores the fact that the state can manipulate the definition (EG nazi germany legalising holocaust)

48
Q

What are the different definitions of state crime - social harms and zemiology

+ criticisms

A

Most of the harm done by the state is not against the law
= Michalowski - state crime is not only illegal acts, but legal acts whose consequences (in terms of harm) are similar to those of illegal acts

Hillyard et al - we should reject the study of crime with zemiology - the study of harms, whether or not they are against the law. EG harm includes state-facilitated poverty
= this prevents states from creating their own laws to hide behind. Also keeps everyone to a single standard, applicable to different states

Criticisms:
How much harm must occur before an act is defined as a crime?
Who decides what counts as harm?

49
Q

What are the different definitions of state crime - labelling and societal reaction

+ criticism

A

Whether an act constitutes a crime depends on whether the social audience defines it as a crime

This definition recognises that crime is socially constructed, so what people define as a crime is subjective (due to different beliefs)

Critic
This definition is even vaguer than social harms

50
Q

What are the different definitions of state crime - international law

+ Pro and con

A

Rothe and Mullins - state crime is when a state violates international law / state’s own domestic law

Advantage:
Uses globally agreed definitions of state crime - intentionally designed to deal with state crime, unlike domestic law

Criticism:
International law is socially constructed, countries have power to change laws to suit their actions

51
Q

What are the different definitions of state crime - human rights

+ pro and con

A

Herman and Schwendinger - we should define state crime as the violation of people’s basic human rights
= states committing racism, sexism, economic exploitation etc are all committing state crime

Advantage:
Risse et al - this is good because all states share the same ethos of shared human rights

Criticism:
Cohen - crimes like torture are explicitly open crimes, whilst economic exploitation is more hidden and is not a self evident crime

52
Q

Crimes of obedience model

A

State crimes are crimes of conformity because they require obedience from authority

Kelman and Hamilton - 3 general features that produce crimes of obedience:
1. Authorisation - when acts are approved by authority, moral principles are replaced by duty to obey
2. Routinisation - once act has been committed, there is a pressure to turn the act into a routine, to cause detachment
3. Dehumanisation - when the enemy is portrayed as sub-human, normal morals do not apply

53
Q

Crimes of obedience AO2

A

My Lai Massacre in Vietnam

400 civilians killed by America
26 soldiers charged
1 convicted

54
Q

The authoritarian personality

A

Adorno et al - civilians willing to obey the orders of superiors without question

SL AO2 - Stanford prison experiment / Milgram’s experiment

55
Q

Culture of denial - what is it and the 3 stages

A

Cohen - states have to legitimate their actions, following a 3-stage ‘spiral of state denial’

Stage 1 - ‘It didn’t happen’ - they deny but human rights organisations, victims and media show it did happen

Stage 2 - ‘If it did happen, it’s something else’ - they say its self defence (EG President Assad’s chemical attacks on opposition forces)

Stage 3 - ‘Even if it is what you say it is, it’s justified’ - EG to protect national security (EG US entering Iraq)

56
Q

Culture of denial - neutralisation theory

A

Sykes and Matza identify 5 neutralisation techniques that are used to justify behaviour

  1. Denial of victim
  2. Denial of injury
  3. Denial of responsibility
  4. Condemning the condemners
  5. Appeal to higher loyalty

These aim to sway public opinion of the state’s actions

57
Q

Why is state crime hard to research?

A

Governments either deny, justify or reclassify their actions

They have unlimited power - can cover up their crimes

No official statistics / victim surveys - we don’t know the true figure of state crime

Researchers rely on media reports - secondary data - can we trust it?

There is no fixed definition - how can it be researched properly?