Crime and Deviance Flashcards
How do functionalists see society?
- Functionalist perspective of crime
- Based on a value consensus, people share a common culture of norms, values, beliefs and goals promoting social solidarity
How do functionalists believe social solidarity is achieved in society?
- Socialisation, instils shared culture internalising the same norms and values
- Social control, institutions reward good actions and punish bad ones instilling a shared moral compass
Why did functionalist Durkheim believe crime was inevitable in every society?
- Not everyone receives the same degree of socialisation so some are not socialised into the same norms and values
- Diversity of lifestyles and values, some subcultures may view some behaviour as normal and another may see it as deviant
In the eyes of functionalists, how do more complex societies face a higher risk of anomie?
- Rules governing behaviour are less clear due to more complex divisions of labour making people increasingly different from one another weakening the collective conscience resulting in higher levels of deviance
In the eyes of functionalists, what are the positive functions of crime?
- Boundary maintenance, unites people in condemnation of wrongdoing reinforcing collective conscience and social solidarity such as a courtroom dramatising wrongdoing
- Adaptation and change, social change begins with an act of deviance such as the legalisation of homosexuality
- Safety valve, a way for people to relieve stress to prevent greater bad such as men soliciting prostitution to prevent domestic abuse
- Diagnosing society’s problems, E.G high truancy rates means the education system may need reforming
According to functionalists, what levels of crime in society are undesirable?
- Too much crime leads to anomie and the destruction of society
- Too little crime means society is too repressive preventing change and individual freedom
What are the criticisms of the functionalist belief that crime is inevitable and positive to society?
- Durkheim never specifies which amount of crime is the right amount in society
- Ignores the negative effects of crime, such as prostitution sustaining the nuclear family but negatively impacting the women who are illegally trafficked
- Deviance does not always promote solidarity, E.G women having to stay isolated for fear of being attacked when outside and alone
What is Merton’s functionalist strain theory?
- The theory that people commit acts of deviance when they are unable to commit mainstream goals through socially acceptable means
Caused by a combination of
- Structural factors, societies unequal opportunities
- Cultural factors, emphasis on success, less focus on how to achieve it
How does the American dream perpetuate Merton’s functionalist strain theory?
- American culture values material success achieved meritocratically
- The reality is different with opportunities being unequal due to things like discrimination, poverty etc.
- This creates a pressure to succeed making people resort to illegitimate means like crime and deviance
- America perpetuates this by placing more focus on success and not the measures to succeed
-
Why are there different reactions to Merton’s functionalist strain theory and what are they?
- An individuals position in social structure affects their access to legitimate measures of success forcing some to source illegitimate means where others wouldn’t
- Conformists, achieve mainstream goals in legitimate ways (middle class)
- Innovators, achieve mainstream goals in illegitimate ways such as theft or fraud (working class)
- Ritualists, internalised legitimate means but no desire to succeed (lower middle class in dead end jobs)
- Retreatists, reject mainstream success and legitimate means (mentally ill, addicts, homeless etc.)
- Rebels, Reject mainstream goals by replacing them with new ones (political radicals and counter cultures such as anarchists) `
What are the strengths of Merton’s functionalist strain theory?
- Most crime in America is property crime due to material wealth being valued so highly
- Lower class crime rates are higher due to their lack of opportunity to achieve mainstream means legitimately
What are the weaknesses of Merton’s functionalist strain theory?
- Takes crime statistics at face value which overrepresent working class crime and is too deterministic in saying that working class people all deviate
- Marxists argue it ignores the power of the ruling class to criminalise the proletariat
- Assumes there is a value consensus of money success that people do not deviate from
- Does not explain non-utilitarian crime
- Ignores roles of group deviance such as delinquent subcultures
What is a functionalist subcultural strain theory and how does it criticise Merton’s strain theory?
- See deviance as the result of a delinquent subculture deviating from mainstream goals and replacing them with their own obtained through alternative status
Criticises Merton’s theory for two reasons:
- Merton ignores that most deviance is committed in groups especially amongst the youth
- Merton ignores non-utilitarian crime such as assault and vandalism
What is A.K Cohen’s functionalist status frustration?
- Working class boys experience culture clash with middle class school system due to cultural deprivation leaving them at the bottom of the official status hierarchy
- The boys then form groups seeking alternative status through deviance such as truancy and vandalism replacing official status through value inversion
What are the evaluations of A.K Cohen’s functionalist status frustration theory?
Strengths
- Offers an explanation of non-utilitarian crime unlike Merton
Weaknesses
- Like Merton, assumes there is a value consensus of middle class goals ignoring the possibility of the boys not sharing the goals in the first place
What is Cloward and Ohlin’s functionalist three subcultures strain theory?
- The key reason different subcultures react in different ways is not only unequal access to legitimate means but unequal opportunities to illegitimate means as well resulting in three different types of subcultures
- For example, drug dealers have to obtain suppliers and if one isn’t accessible then neither is the opportunity
What are the three different types of subcultures according to Cloward and Ohlin’s functionalist three subculture theory?
- Criminal subcultures, provide youths with an apprenticeship in utilitarian crime due to long standing criminal organisation being local
- Conflict subcultures, areas of high population causing social disorganisation disabling formation of stable criminal culture, loose gangs form providing a release for young men’s status frustration
- Retreatist subcultures, double failures who fail legitimately and illegitimately instead engaging in drug abuse
What are the strengths and weaknesses of Cloward and Ohlin’s functionalist three subculture theory?
Strengths
- Provide explanation for non and utilitarian crime
Weaknesses
- Ignores the crimes of the wealthy
- Over-predicts amount of working class crime
- Ignores wider power structure that create and enforce laws
- Assumes criminals can’t be part of multiple subcultures
- Assumes the working class share middle glass goals and have to experience status frustration to change
What is Cicourels interactionist negotiation of justice theory?
- Police constrict criminal typifications based on classist and racist stereotypes, leading them to patrol certain areas more leading to more arrests and confirming stereotypes
- Other agents of social control reinforce this, E.G probation officers not supporting non-custodial sentences for the working class
- This shows that justice is negotiable as middle class people can use their socially accepted background to improve their chances of avoiding punishment
What does Cicourel’s interactionist negotiation of justice theory suggest about official crime statistics?
- Do not give a valid picture of crime and cannot be used as a resource
- Should be used as a topic for sociologists to research investigating the processes that created them
How do interactionists believe crime statistics are socially constructed, what is the effect of this and what other sources can we use?
- At each stage of the CJS agents of social control choose whether or not to continue with the case meaning statistics show behaviour of social control agents not criminals
- This produces the dark figure of crime, the difference between the recorded socially constructed rates of crime and the actual unknown rates of crime
- To get a better idea of the real rate of crime other sources such as self report studies or the crime victim survey of England and Wales can be used
What is the difference between primary and secondary deviance according to interactionist Lemert?
- Primary deviance, committed every day by normal people and impossible to source. E.G fare dodging or pushing in line
- Secondary deviance, result of negative labels by society and excluded, their master status is replaced by ‘criminal’ starting an identity crisis only solved by accepting the label starting a self fulfilling prophecy and the further deviance after this is labelled secondary deviance
- Secondary deviance provokes more negative reactions from society reinforcing the label beginning a career of deviance such as convictions leading to a criminal record leading to unemployment calling the need to commit crime
In the eyes of interactionists, what is the deviance amplification spiral and what is an example of one?
- An exponential increase in levels of crime caused by attempts to control it
- Stanley Cohen’s mods and rockers demonised by moral entrepreneurs who began moral panics. The moral panic was confirmed by the bigger crackdown on the group resulting in the moral audience further marginalising the group as folk devils causing them to commit further deviance
According to interactionist Braithwaite, what are the two types of labelling and how can one be positive?
- Disintergrative shaming, the crime and the criminal is seen as bad
- Intergrative shaming, the crime but not the criminal is seen as bad
- Intergrative shaming makes the person aware of their wrongdoing while also allowing others to feel empathy for them allowing them to change before committing secondary deviance
According to interactionist Douglas, how are suicide statistics socially constructed?
- Tell us about the activities of the coroners rather than suicide victims
- Declarations of suicide depend on interactions between coroners, friends, doctors etc.
- E.G a religious coroner may be reluctant to claim a death as suicide as it is seen as a sin
- Douglas believes we should use quantitative methods such as analysis of suicide notes or unstructured interviews with friends and relatives
According to interactionist lemert, how are mental ilness diagnosis socially constructed?
- Some people don’t fit into groups and are excluded due to primary deviance
- The person responds with secondary deviance giving the social audience another reason to exclude them and members begin to agree on the persons odd behaviour confirming the suspicions of being conspired against.
- –The reaction to the confirmation confirms the suspicions of family members leading a psychiatric intervention with the person being labelled as mentally ill replacing their master status
- This is confirmed by Rosenhan’s pseudo patient experiment where researchers entered themselves as hearing voices and were labelled as schizophrenic despite acting normal