Crim2 Flashcards

1
Q

Accomplice /Accessory Liability

An Accomplice who … +CAx2:

A

1) AIDS /Abets /Encourages / Assists a PRINCIPAL [perpet.] in the commission of a crime
2) w/ SI that the crime be accomplished, is VICARIOUSLY LIABLE for the crime committed & all
other FORESEEABLE CRIMES
CA1: Mere PRESENCE /K.
CA2: CLASS MEMBER protected by the violated statute.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Accomplice /Accessory Liability:

WITHDRAWAL

A

DFN if Accomplice TAKES BACK his AID before the crime happens.

[ materials given, etc. ]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

–ALL INCHOATE OFFENSES are …:

–IMPOSSIBILITY … +CA:

A

SI crimes that trigger Accompl. /Consp. liability.
+IMPOSSIBILITY of fact is NEVER a DFN!

CA1: LEGAL imposs.
CA2: Class MEMBER protected by the violated statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

SOLICITATION: D

[no AGT needed]

+ WITHDRAWAL

A

1) REQUESTS another to commit a CRIME!
2) w/ Specific INTENT S’ee commits it.
3) Once completed, Solicitation
MERGES !
4) Withdrawal:
D remains GUILTY of Solic.; RENUNCIATION merely avoids liability 4 subseq. crimes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

ATTEMPT requires …

+Merger

A

1) that D acts w/ SI: to COMMIT the (incomplete) target crime
2) & “SUBST. STEP” towards completion BEYOND mere PREPERATION
[MP: lying in wait=suff.]
3) MERGES: into the completed crime

[Factual IMPOSS. is NO DFN!]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

WITHDRAWAL in Conspiracy:

A

is a DFN but D REMAINS GUILTY of consp. b/c objective is concluded.

Merely avoids liability for CO-Cs’ SUBSEQ. crimes if: (CL) TIMELY NOTICE to all.

MPC: 1) VOL. Renunciate
2) make efforts to THWART

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CONSPIRACY

+ merger

A

1) AGT 2) INT to ENTER into an AGT
3) SI that the AGT be CARRIED OUT
4) +@CL: 2 guilty minds +NO OVERT ACT.
Maj: +OA in furtherance.
–NO MERGER: w/ subst. crime => D can be charged w/ both.
AGT: can be IMPLIED [unspoken]. Only @CL: cop faking it => No 2 guilty minds.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

*Battery

A

1) [INT /Reckl b/c (GI)] unlawful application of FORCE to the PERSON of another, which
2) RESULTS in an OT or Bodily harm
[AR: incl. indirect touching /crim.N.] Or a
3) completed ASSAULT (GI).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

[WHARTON Rule +CA:]

A

CL WHARTON Rule:

If crime requires 2 parties,
a CONSPIRACY needs 3+ parties.
[ prostitution, i.e. “group action” ].

Cf: MP: UNILATERAL Conspiracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

RAPE:

A

1) Non-Consensual
2) intercourse (GI). Slightest penetr. (AR) completes the crime.
Cf. Statutory rape:
Sex with a minor (SL).
Consent & Mistake of Fact (age)= NO DFNs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Crim. ASSAULT: is EITHER:

+MERGER

A

1) an ATTEMPT to commit a BATTERY (SI), or
2) int creation of reas. appreh. in V’s mind of imm. bodily harm other than by mere WORDS (GI).
- -MERGES into Battery (greater offense): if there’s an ACTUAL TOUCHING.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

**HOMICIDE

[BARRK=Burglary /Arson /Rape /Robbery /Kidnapping]

A

unlawful killing of a HUMAN being by another w/ criminal INT.

(Omission: GR +Special Duty)
[AC & PC([N. med. treatment] = is the natural fores. result of D’s act)].

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

APPROACH to Homicide Crimes:

A
  1. Homicide?
  2. Malice?
  3. Modern Degree?
  4. DFN (Justification /Excuses)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

M: If No Malice – only 2 possibilities:

A

1) INvol. Manslaughter:
a) Crim. N.
[malum in se]
b) Misdemeanor MS
[malum prohibitum by statute] (see)
2) No Crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

MALICE

[INT to do the act: a) DESIRE the Result
b) SUBST. CERTAINTY [Spring Gun]
[If, After GBH, V. dies b/c of a peculiar med. condition =Murder.
GBH can be inferred from the weapon]

A

1) INT to KILL
2) INT to seriously INJURY
3) INT. to COMMIT an underlying FELONY
(=FMR: BARRK) = 1st DGM.
4) RECKLESS disregard of an EXTREME risk 2human life /DHM [risk that D’s conduct is LIKELY to cause GBH or Death (GI)]. => 2ndDGM, even if NO INT ! [CA: shooting in forest =invol.MS]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

2nd DEGREE

[Russian Roulette /Shooting thru door]

A

Any Murder that’s not 1st DGM is 2nd DGM
(=GI)
[=yes malice +no PREMED. or DELIB.
e.g. DHM
(MP: extreme indifference to high risk 2human life) ]

17
Q

1st DEGREE

+ Non-issue

A

1st Degree: Statute will specify:
1) Malice + PREMED.& DELIB. INT. to kill = SI.
[Crim. HOM. w/ malice afore.]
2) or FM (=GI)
[+any M by Poison /Bomb]
Non-issue: No ev. of premed. or delib. killing, & didn’t occur during (attempted) commission of an inh. dang. felony
=> NO BASIS for finding D guilty of 1st DGM

18
Q

CL MURDER

A

is the unlawful killing of a HUMAN being w/ MALICE AFORETHOUGHT, which can be IMPLIED from D’s: …

19
Q

Murder requires an AR, which here was D’s act of [shooting V]. It also requires CAUSATION …

A

both AC & PC.
Here, AC is easily satisfied b/c “BUT FOR” …

… D’s act of [shooting V., V.] would not have died.

20
Q

ATTEMPT: WITHDRAWAL +CA:

A

MAJ.&CL:
Withdrawal is NO EXCUSE to criminal liability.
MPC:
No criminal liability iff:
D VOLUNTARILY & PERMANENTLY ABANDONS the criminal PLAN.

21
Q

PC is the connection which …

Here, PC easily satisfied, …

A

LIMITS liability to PERSONS & CONSEQUENCES that are FORESEEABLE in light of D’s actions.

… b/c D’s act of [] was the direct cause of V’s death w/o any INTERVENING causes or UNfores. events.
[death is a logical & F result]

22
Q

ATTEMPT: WITHDRAWAL

A

MAJ + MP:
No criminal liability iff:
D VOLUNTARILY & PERMANENTLY ABANDONS
the criminal PLAN.

MIN.: Withdrawal is NO EXCUSE to criminal liability.

23
Q

If MALICE found

A

potentially Murder => Consider:
1) JUSTIFICATION ? (=Self-DFN) /EXCUSES (=infancy, insanity, invol. intox.)
=> NO Crime.

2) MITIGATION
(=HEAT of PASSION)?
=> VOL. MS.
(Else stays Murder).

24
Q

[ CHAIN vs. WHEEL THEORY, ]

A

–CHAIN THEORY:
D’s liability extends to ANY acts of ANY Co-Conspirator (=During the consp. +w/in its Scope).

–WHEEL THEORY:
NO liability if a Co-Conspirator
INDEPENDENTLY conspires w/ a 3P.

25
Q

[ CHAIN vs. WHEEL THEORY ]

A

–CHAIN THEORY:
D’s liability extends to ANY F acts of ANY Co-Conspirator. [=need NOT know each other]

–WHEEL THEORY:
NO liability if a Co-Conspirator INDEPENDENTLY conspires w/ a 3P. [=DO need to know each other]