Crim Pro - Miranda & Other Rights of Accused Flashcards
When does Miranda apply?
→ person’s Miranda Rights apply when he is in custodial interrogation…
(1) Custody, AND
(2) Interrogation
Custody
“Custody” = when a reasonable person would NOT feel free to leave
*don’t need to be Handcuffed to be in Custody
Interrogation
“Interrogation” = when Police says OR does something attempting to elicit an incriminating response from a person
Do Police need to give Miranda Warning immediately?
= NO
Volunteered Statements
= if Suspect volunteers information, NO Miranda Warning is required
What is the Miranda Warning?
Miranda Warning:
- You have the right to remain silent.
- Anything you say may be used against you in court.
- You have the right to an attorney.
- If you cannot afford one, one will be provided to you.
Invoking Right to Counsel
= if Suspect requests a lawyer, ALL questioning MUST STOP
Waiver of Miranda Rights
= Suspect CAN waive Miranda Rights IF he…
(1) has already been read his Miranda Warning, AND
(2) waives it knowingly AND voluntarily
Right Against Self-Incrimination
= Defendant can NEVER be required to testify
and Defendant CANNOT be required to make incriminating statements
BUT, Defendant MAY be required to perform physical acts (e.g., put glove on his hand, walk around to show his limp)
Lineups & Identifications
= Lineups and IDs CANNOT be unnecessarily suggestive to single out person
“unnecessarily suggestive” → look at the totality of the circumstances…
E.g., the only tall guy, the only guy with a beard, the only guy with grey hair
If there’s an out-of-court identification that’s too suggestive, but later on there’s an in-court identification that’s reliable, can any of these IDs be used?
= YES, only the later in-court ID that was reliable will be VALID
What does Prosecutor vs. Grand Jury do vis-a-vis a suspect?
Prosecutor → CHARGES the suspect
Grand Jury → INDICTS the suspect
Right to Counsel regarding a Lineup
…if Lineup is _PRIOR_ to Indictment → NO Right to Counsel
…if Lineup is AFTER Indictment → YES Right to Counsel
When does a person have the 5th Amendment Right to Counsel?
= he has 5th Amendment Right to Counsel BEFORE Charges** OR **Indictment
When does a person have the 6th Amendment Right to Counsel?
= he has 6th Amendment Right to Counsel AFTER Formal Charges
Right to Effective Counsel
RULE: Attorney violated D’s Right to Effective Counsel IF…
(1) Attorney deviated from the norms, AND
(2) there’s reasonable probability the outcome would’ve been different
*presumption is Attorney was effective – so Burden of Proof is on Defendant
Waiver of Right to Counsel
= Defendant CAN waive his Right to Counsel IF he waives it KNOWINGLY
When during the proceedings does Defendant have Right to Counsel?
= at all Critical Stages of the proceeding –
Vis-a-vis Right to Counsel, what are the Critical Stages of a proceeding?
“CRITICAL STAGES” of Proceeding: *generally, after Indictment
- Post-indictment Interrogation
- Preliminary Hearings for probable cause to prosecute
- Arraignment (hearing when prosecution announces charges it has filed against D, and D pleads guilty / not guilty)
- Post-charge Lineups
- Guilty Pleas & Sentencing
- Felony Trials
- Misdemeanor Trials with imposed Imprisonment
- Overnight Recess during trial
- Appeals as a Matter of Right
- Appeals of Guilty Pleas
- Pleas of Nolo Contendere
In which situations does a D NOT have a Right to Counsel (NOT critical stages of a proceeding)?
Situations when a D does NOT have a Right to Counsel: *generally, before Charges
- Pre-Charge / Investigative Lineups
- Photo IDs
- Blood Sampling
- Handwriting or Voice samples
- Preliminary Hearings for probable cause to detain
- Brief Recess during D’s Testimony
- Discretionary Appeals
- Parole & Probation Revocation Proceedings
- Post-conviction Proceedings
Shared Counsel
= Co-Defendants CAN Share an Attorney – UNLESS a conflict of interest** arises that would EITHER **hurt one of the D’sORaffect Attorney’s ability to represent one of the D’s
***Undercover Officer in Jail Cell
***double check this
= undercover officer planted in jail cell with D and boasts about crimes he says he did – D responds by confessing his own crimes
^this is ILLEGAL → violates D’s Right to Counsel – Miranda does NOT apply here
Guilty Plea
= to Plea Guilty, D must do so Voluntarily AND Intelligently such that he knows what the consequences are
Severance
= if TWO Defendants are tried together, but one D will be “unfairly prejudiced”, then that D can sever the trial and be tried on his own