Crim Pro Flashcards
Crim Pro key Const AMDs
4th, 5th, 6th, 8th
4th AMD crim pro prohibition
Prohibition against unreasonable search and seizure
5th AMD crim pro privilege & prohibition
Privilege against compulsory self-incrimination
Prohibition against double jeopardy
6th AMD rights
Right to speedy trial
Right to trial by jury
Right to confront witnesses (Confrontation Clause)
Right to assistance of counsel
8th Amd prohibition
prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment (addresses death penalty and prisoner rights)
Exclusionary rule
A remedy of American constitutional procedure whereby someone who has been the victim of an illegal search or a coerced confession can have the product of that illegal search of that coerced statement EXCLUDED from any subsequent criminal prosecution.
Limitations on exclusion
- Does not apply to grand jury proceedings (grand jury witness may be compelled to testify based on illegally seized evidence)
- Exclusion is not an available remedy in civil proceedings or parole revocation proceedings
- Exclusion does not apply to the use of excluded evidence for impeachment purposes. (All illegally seized evidence may be admitted to impeach the credibility of the Ds, but not of other defense witnesses, trial testimony.)
- Exclusion is not available for violations of the knock and announce rule in the execution of search warrants.
Fruit of the poisonous tree doctrine
Not only is illegally seized evidence excluded, but also all evidence obtained or derived from police illegality is excluded. (Does not apply to Miranda violations unless the police act in bad faith in obtaining such information.)
3 ways that the government can break the chain between an original, unlawful police action and some supposedly derived piece of evidence
3 in’s
- Independent source (evidence came from a source independent of that original police illegality)
- Inevitable discovery (police would have inevitably discovered this evidence anyway)
- Intervening acts of free will (D provides the evidence under his free will, often a voluntary confession)
Exclusionary rule - convictions
- A conviction will not necessarily be overturned because improperly obtained evidence was admitted at trial.
- On appeal, a court will apply the harmless error test, under which a conviction will be upheld if the conviction would have resulted despite the improper evidence.
What does the 4th AMD protect?
The 4th AMD protects citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures.
What must an arrest be based on?
An arrest must be based on probable cause.
Are arrest warrants generally required before arresting in a public place?
No. Arrest warrants are not generally required before arresting in a public place.
Does a non-emergency arrest of an individual in his home require an arrest warrant?
Yes. A non-emergency arrest of an individual in his home requires an arrest warrant.
For a station house detention, in order to compel you to come to the police station either for fingerprinting or interrogation or arrest you, what do the police need?
Police need probable cause to arrest you and compel you to come to the police station either for fingerprinting or interrogation.
Does the police have authority to briefly detain a person, even if they lack probable cause?
Yes. The police have the authority to make a Terry stop, or to briefly detain a person, even if they lack probable cause.
What is required of the police in order to make a Terry stop?
To make a Terry stop, police must have a REASONABLE SUSPICION supported by ARTICULABLE FACTS of criminal activity.
What determines if police have reasonable suspicion to make a Terry stop?
Whether the police have reasonable suspicion depends on the totality of circumstances.
rule on automobile stops
Police may stop a car if they have at least reasonable suspicion that the law has been violated.
What is the exception to the rule on auto stops?
The exception are checkpoint roadblocks. For a checkpoint roadblock to be valid, the roadblock must i) stop cars on the basis of some neutral, articulable standard and ii) serve purposes closely related to the problem pertaining to cars and their mobility (DUI tests and border checks)
5 steps for Search and Seizure essay
- Is there govt conduct?
- Standing? (is there a REOP to provide standing?)
- Did the police have a valid search warrant? (2 Ps - probable cause and particularity)
- If police do not have a valid search warrant, does the good faith defense save the defective search warrant?
- If the warrant is not valid and not saved by officer’s good faith defense, does the warrant requirement provide an exception?
Search and Seizure essay: Step 1
Is there government conduct?
Publicly paid police (on or off duty)
Any private individual acting at the direction of the public police
(The actions of privately paid police, like store security guards, subdivision police or campus police, do NOT constitute governmental conduct UNLESS they are deputized with the power to arrest.)
Search and Seizure essay: Step 2
Standing through REOP
Automatic categories of standing
- Own the premises searched
- Live on the premises searched
- Overnight guest
Search and Seizure essay: Step 2
Standing through REOP
“Sometimes” category of standing
If you own the property seized, you have standing ONLY IF you have a REOP in the item or area searched.
Search and Seizure essay: Step 2
Standing through REOP
“No standing” categories
You have no REOP for anything that you hold out to the public everyday. (i.e. sound of your voice, style of your handwriting, paint on your car, bank records, monitoring the location of your car but not the planting of a GPS device on your car, open fields, anything seen by flying over in public air space, odors from your luggage or car, garbage set out on the curb for collection)
Search and Seizure essay: Step 3
Did police have a valid search warrant?
2 core requirements for a facially valid search warrant (2 Ps)
- probable cause
2. particularity