Crim Pro Flashcards
Transactional Immunity
Cannot get prosecuted for the underlying crime
Use immunity
Testimony cannot be used to prosecute you
Does derivative use immunity protect a W from use of W’s testimony in a subsequent civil trial?
No
5A
Privilege against self-incrimination (Testimonial in nature)
Does 5A Privilege Against Self-Incrimination apply in civil proceedings?
Yes, 5A privilege must be granted by states through the 14A
Does failure to “knock and announce exclude evidence under the exclusionary rule?
No, not unless the warrant was not valid, but the police officer likely will receive §1983 sanctions
Can undercover cop question man in custody after he has invoked his 6A right to counsel?
No
Dual Sovereignty Doctrine
Prosecution of a ∆ by the federal gov’t for a crime arising out of an event does not prevent a state from prosecuting the ∆ for a crime arising out of the same event and
vice versa for (state v. fed) & (state v. state)
Car Arrest, what items can be searched/seized?
(officer) safety and fruits of the arrest (i.e., evidence for the suspected crime)
Must counsel be present for a photo array?
No
Should search stop once evidence to the cause the warrant is grounded on has been seized?
Yes, otherwise it exceeds the scope of the warrant
5A Grand Jury Cl
requires ∆ to be indicted by a grand jury for any “capital or otherwise infamous crime”
Is 5A Grand Jury Cl. applicable to states under 14A DPC?
No
Does 4A exclusionary rule apply to civil proceedings?
No
Can a police stop/arrest a suspect on the basis of reasonable suspicion that suspect has committed a specific crime?
The police may stop but cannot arrest
8A Excessive Bail Cl
when bail is set, it cannot be excessive (i.e., set higher than an amt REASONABLY calculated to ensure ∆’s PRESENCE AT TRIAL)
Is there a ceiling to 8A Excessive Bail Cl?
No
Can the state impose a strict cutoff that precludes a finding of intellectual disability
No, prohibits 8A, bc the rule creates an unacceptable risk that a person w/an intellectual disability will be executed
Gov’t must prove that ∆ waived his Miranda rights during a custodial interrogation by
Preponderance of the evidence
search
Government searching where there is a reasonable expectation of privacy
Open Fields Doctrine
Open areas w/ no expectation of privacy is not a search
probable cause
a reasonable person would conclude it is more probable than not that a crime has taken place
Warrant elements
- issued by a detached magistrate
- facts must be fresh
- persons places must be specific
- cannot exceed the scope
Once search uncovers the thing he was looking to find under the warrant, the search must
STOP