Crim Law and Procedure Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Mens Rea - CL

A
  1. Specific Intent
    1. intent or desire to engage in the conduct or cause of a certain result.
  2. General Intent
    1. awareness of acting in a certain way
  3. Malice
    1. reckless disregard of a known risk to occur
  4. Strict Liability
    1. no mental state required; only the act required.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Homicide - Murder

A
  1. Intent to Kill
  2. Intent to inflict Serious Bodily Harm
  3. Depraceh Heart Murder
  4. Felony Murder
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Homice- Murder - CL/ 2nd

1st Degree

A

Murder is the unlawful killing, of another, with malice aforethought.

Malice aforethought: intent to kill, intent for injury, reckless disregard, feelony murder rule.

First DegreeL willfull, deliberate and premeditated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Manslaughter: Voluntary & Involuntary

A

Voluntary: Intentional killing of another without malice aforethought. (Adequate Provocation)

  • AdequateProvocation: provoked + no time to cool + D did not cool
    involuntary: unintentional killing of another.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Specific Intent Crimes: BAM ACTS

A
  • Burglary
  • Assault
  • Murder (1st)
  • Attempt
  • Conspiracy
  • Theft
  • Solicitation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Theft Crimes

A
  • Larceny
    • taking and carring away of personal propety of another by trespass with intent to permanently deprive
  • Larceny by Trick
    • obtaining possession (not title) of personal property of another by deception (false statement) w/ intent to defraud
  • False Pretense
    • obtaiing title to personal property of another, through an intentional false stmt with intent to defraud.
  • Embezzlement
    • fraudulent conversion of personal property of another by a person in lawful possession of that property. (intent to to deprive)
  • RSP
    • receiving possession and control of stolen personal propert known to have been stolen by another person with intent to permanently deprive owner.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Robbery

A

Taking of personal property of another by force of threat of death with intent to permanently deprive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Burglary

A

Breaking and entering of a dwelling of another at night with intent to commt a felony therein.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Insanity Test: M”Naughten

A

At time of conduct, D lacked ability to know wrongfulness of actions or nature/ qualit of actions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Insanity Test: Irresistible impulse

A

D lacks capacity for self- control and free choice, or unable to conform conduct to law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Insanity Test: MPC

A

D lacked capacity to appreciate criminality of conduct or conform conduct to requirements of law.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Self- Defense

A

complete self defense to a crime.

  • Non- Deadly
    • justified when : D reasonably believes in imminent danger AND force is proportional to harm threatened.
  • Deadly:
    • justified when : D kills on reasonable belief of imminent danger and use of deadly force was necessary.
  • Minority view: r
    • duty to retreat before deadly force. No duty if in own home. cant retreat safely, or no opportunity.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Arrest

A

Probable cause + warrant if D in home.

  • PC: trust worthy facts + RP to believe+ D commited crime

In car: requires reasonable suspicion (checkpoint or pre-textual stops ok)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

(4th) Valid Warrant Requirements

A
  1. PC +
  2. particularity of place seized,
  3. particularity of things seized; AND
  4. issued by neutral and detached judicial officer.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Seaarch and Seizure Analysis

A
  1. Does person ahve 4th right?
    1. Govt conduct and REP requires standing.
  2. Search warrant valid?
  3. is there an exception?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Search and Seizure Exceptions: SPACE

A
  • Search Incident to Arrest
    • search suspect’s person + area within immediate control (“wingspan”)
      • if a home, immediately adjoining spaces from when an attack may be launched.
  • Plainview
    • plainview of officer’s five senses + lawful place +PC
  • Automobile
    • inventory: interior compartments of bar but not trunk.
    • if PC: full search including any containters
  • Consent
    • freely, voluntarily, and intelligently
  • Exigent Circumstances
    • hot pursuit. or necessary to prevent imminent destruction
  • Stop and Frisk
    • must have RS that crim activity a foot + a weapon
17
Q

5th Am.

A

protects the right to not incriminate.

18
Q

Right to Counsel (6th)

A

Attached once formal judicial proceedings began.

  • 5th Am- starts for custodial interrogations
  • formal charge, prelim hearings, indictment, arraignment

D has right to effective asstance of counsel including aid in preparation and trial in criminal cases.

19
Q

Exclusionary Rule: Fruit of Poisonous Tree

A

Prohibits introduction fo evidence obtained in violation of 4th, 5th , or 6th Am. And all derived evid from this is inadmissible.

20
Q

Exclusionary Rule Esceptions

A
  • Stmts in violation of Miranda
  • independent source
  • inevitable discovery
  • intervening act of free will by D
  • violation of knock and announce

But voluntary confessions in violation of Miranda are admissible to impeach. nd evidence from illegal search can impeach D’s trial testimony.

21
Q

Burden of Proof

A

beyond a reasonable doubt for every element.

Burden cant be shifted to D. but D may prove affirmative defense.