Crim Law Flashcards
What is the general jurisdiction law regarding criminal law?
A state acquires jurisdiction over a crime if either the conduct or the result happened in that state.
When will merger of crimes be allowed?
Generally never, but solicitation and attempt merge into the substantive offense. (So if you attempt to commit robbery but actually commit robbery, you can’t be convicted of attempt.
Can conspiracy merge into the substantive offense?
No. It does NOT merge. You CAN be convicted of both conspiring to do something and actually doing it.
What are the essential elements of a crime?
An act or omission of an act as well as a mental state.
What constitutes an “act” for criminal law purposes?
Any bodily movement that was a voluntary act.
What are bodily movements that do NOT qualify for criminal liability?
- Conduct which is not the product of your own volition.
- A reflexive or convulsive act.
* *3. An act performed while you are unconscious or asleep. (Sleepwalkers.)
When is omission an “act” for criminal law?
- By statute. (Ex. filing tax returns)
- By contract. (Ex. An on duty lifeguard or nurse has a legal duty to act.)
- Because of the relationship between the parties. (Parents duty to protect children; spouse’s duty to protect the other spouse.)
* *4. Because you voluntarily assume a duty of care and then fail to adequately perform it.
* *5. When you conduct created the peril.
What are the four common law mental states of a crime?
- Specific intent crimes
- Malice crimes
- General intent crimes
- Strict liability crimes
What are the specific intent crimes?
Students Can Always Fake A Laugh, Even For Ridiculous Bar Facts
Solicitation Conspiracy Attempt First Degree Murder Assault Larceny Embezzlement False Pretences Robbery Burglary Forgery
What are 2 malice crimes on the bar?
Murder (common law–not 1st degree)
Arson
What are general intent crimes?
All crimes that aren’t either specific intent or malice crimes.
Two most commonly tested on the bar are rape and battery.
Is it possible to transfer the intent in a crime?
Yes. (Ex. Mean to kill Barney but miss him and kill Dora. You had the intent to murder, so the first degree murder intent will transfer even though you didn’t actually mean to kill Dora. Still had the requisite intent needed for 1st degree murder.)
If there is transferred intent, is it possible to be charged with both the crime and the attempt of the crime?
Yes. There are 2 different victims here, so there are 2 different crimes.
What are strict liability crimes?
No intent crimes. If a statute or reg doesn’t have words signalling intent, such as knowingly, willfully, or intentionally, then the statute was meant to be no intent.
What defenses are available to strict liability crimes?
Very few. Intent doesn’t matter. Knowledge doesn’t matter. Basically, if it’s a strict liability crime, then you’re strictly liable for it no matter what.
What are the mental states for the MPC?
- Purposely: One acts purposely when it is his conscious objective to engage in certain conduct or cause a certain result.
- Knowingly: One acts knowingly when he is aware that his conduct will very likely cause the result.
- Recklessly: One acts recklessly when he consciously disregards a substantial and unjustifiable risk.
- Negligently: One acts negligently when he fails to be aware of a substantial and unjustifiable risk.
What in an accomplice?
One who aids, advises, or encourages the principal in the commission of the crime charged. They must have the intent that the crime be committed.
For what crime is an accomplice liable?
The crime itself and all other foreseeable crimes.
How can an accomplice withdraw?
If they encouraged the crime, they must repudiate it.
If they provided assistance, they must do everything possible to neutralize this assistance (such as attempting to retrieve the materials).
An alternate means is also to contact the police.
What are the inchoate offenses in criminal law?
Solicitation
Attempt
Conspiracy
What is the rule for solicitation?
Solicitation is asking someone to commit a crime. The crime of solicitation ends when you ask them.
It is NOT necessary for the person solicited to agree to commit the crime. (If they agree and do it, then it’s conspiracy.)
Factual impossibility is not a defense to solicitation.
What are the elements of conspiracy?
An agreement
With an intent to agree
And an intent to pursue an unlawful objective.
What crimes are co-conspirators liable for?
Furtherance and Foreseeability
Each conspirator is liable for ALL crimes of co-conspirators if those crimes were committed in furtherance of the conspiracy and were foreseeable.
What is the agreement required for conspiracies?
The agreement need not be expressed. Intent can be inferred from conduct.
What is the difference in the bilateral and unilateral approach for agreement required in conspiracies?
The bilateral approach (common law) requires two guilty parties. If one person in a 2 party conspiracy is feigning agreement, the other person cannot be guilty of a conspiracy. The unilateral (MPC approach and modern trend) requires only that one person have a genuine criminal intent.
What is the overt act requirement for conspiracies?
Majority rule is that there must be agreement plus some overt act in furtherance of the agreement. Any little act is enough for the overt act–even just mere preparation.
Common law, however, doesn’t require an overt act. Liability for the conspiracy is grounded in the agreement itself.
Is factual impossibility a defense to conspiracy?
No.
If a co-conspirator withdraws, even adequately, is there liability from the conspiracy itself?
No. Liability can be withdrawn from co-conspirators’ subsequent crimes, but not from the conspiracy itself.
What are the elements for attempt?
- Specific intent
2. An overt act in furtherance of the crime.
For attempt, is mere preparation enough to satisfy the overt act requirement?
No. There must be a substantial step taken in furtherance of the crime.
Is abandonment a defense against attempt?
The majority rule is that once a substantial step has been taken, abandonment is never a defense.
The M.P.C. allows this as a defense only if it was fully voluntary and a complete renunciation of criminal purpose.
What is the difference in legal impossibility and factual impossibility?
Legal impossibility means that something wasn’t actually a crime, even if you thought it was.
Factual impossibility is when the intent was there, but it was impossible to actually do. (ex. robbing an armored van that turns out to be empty.)
What are the defenses available for crimes based on criminal capacity?
Insanity
Intoxication
Infancy
What are the four trigger phases for insanity defenses?
M’Naghten rule
Irresistible Impulse
Durham Rule
Model Penal Code