Crim Law Flashcards
Extortion
KSOPBTFH
Extortion
KSO - PAB - TFH
Knowlingly Seeking to Obtain the Property of Another By Threat of Future Harm
EMBEZZLEMENT
Essence
Elements
Essence: Gaining Title while having Lawful Possession
Elements:
Lawfull Possession, followed by Conversion
ATTEMPT
Elements:
Defenses:
Elements: SI + SS
Defenses: LI
Elements: Specifici Intent + Substantial Step (beyond Mere Prep) - in furtherance of a crime
Defenses: Factual Impossibility >< (not) a Defense
Legal Impossiblitity = Defense
Create Example an Example
ACCOMPLICE LIABILITY
Elements:
General Rule:
Withdrawal:
Accesory after the fact:
Elements: Actively Involved in the Crime (mere presence not enough)
Generally: Accomplices are liable for crime itself + all other Foreseeable Crimes
Withdrawal: Must withdraw feofre crime is unstoppable
a) Voluntarily Renounce b) Make substantial effort to prevent
Accessory after the fact: Not liable for crime itself, but liable for a lessor crime.
THE FOUR MAIN INSANITY DEFENCES
- TYPES: Apply the “Type” of Insanity Defense to the Name of the Insanity Defence Theory
- Local Kansas rule
M’Naughten => Cognative (brain) Impairement
Irresistable Impulse => Non-Cognative
Durham Test => “But For… the mental illness”
MPC* Test => Combines cognative and non-cognative
KANSAS: has abolished the insanity defense, however insanity is relevant to show mental state for intent
Kansas Also allows evidence of diminished capacity in regard to establishing mental intent
M’naughten Rule
Type:
Rule:
Type: Cognative Impairment - i.e. knowing right from wrong
Rule:
a) Disease of the mind
b) at the time of conduct.
Defendent was so impaired that he lacked the ability to known wrongfulness of actions or understand nature and quality of actions
(i.e. Doesn’t Know Right From Wrong)
IRRESISTABLE IMPULSE TEST
Type
Rule
Type: Non-Cognative Reflex
Rule: Unable to control actions or conform conduct to requirements of law.
(ie. cannot resis impulse)
Durham Test
Type:
Rule:
Type: Broad “But for the mental illness…”
Rule: Conduct is the product of a mental illness
Insanity Defense:
MPC Test
Type:
Rule:
Type: Combines Cognative & Non-Cognativie Reflex
Rule: Defendant lacked the ability to appreciate criminality or conduct or conform conduct to requirements of law
Duress/Necessity
- Coercion
- Defense to all crimes except homicide
Defense of Dwelling
- When/When not available?
- Can never use deadly force soley to defend property (no spring guns) BUT
- Can use deadly force to protect occupants from harm OR to prevent felony.
Kansas Rule regarding:
Use of dealy force in self defense
A) Battered women syndrome allowed to show reasonableness of threat preceived as to great bodily harm/death
- Must be evidencie of an immanent threat before admissable
B) Imperfect Self Defense:
Defendent honestly but unreasonably believes necessity of deadly force
=> changes to voluntary manslaughter
C) Initial Aggressor: All means of escape must be exhausted
D) Defense of Dwelling: allowed if reasonably believed it was necessary to prevent death/bodily harm from unlawful entry*
* There is no duty to retreat.
SOLICITATION
Elements
Non-defences
Merger (Common Law; KANSAS)
Kansas Defenses
Elements: Asking someone to commit a crime
Non-Defences:
a) Factual Impossibility >< not a Defense
b ) Refusal or Legal Incapacity >< not a defense
KS Defenses:
a) Persuading solicited person not to commit crime
b) Prevent the commission of the crime
Either a or b manifest complete withdrawal
Conspiracy #2
Defenses:
Withdrawal: (common law, Kansas)
Defenses: Factual impossibility is no defense
Withdrawal:
Common Law - Cannot withdraw from conspiracy but can withdraw from further crimes of co-conspirators
Kansas: Persuading/prevention of crime = Withdrawal