Crim Law 1 Flashcards
Actus Reus
1) Voluntary Act or Omission 2) that causes 3) social harm
Non Voluntary Acts
1) relfex convulsion
2) unconsciousness
3) hynosis
4) movements not of effort
What must be proven for omission to be culpable?
must prove omission would’ve kept act from happening
Bad Samaritan Laws
impose duty to act absent of relationship; must give reasonable assistance
Mens Rea
- guilty mind; criminal intent
- culpability depends on what D is thinking
4 Culpability types
1) purposefully
2) knowingly
3) recklessly
4) negligently
Purposefully
acting with the conscious object for the result to occur
Knowingly
aware that result is virtually certain to occur
Recklessly
consciously disregards substantial and unjustifiable risk
negligently
should be aware of substantial and unjustifiable risk but is not
Willful Blindness
knowledge of high probability -> chooses not to find out more information
General Intent
1 intent -> 1 crime
ex. Battery -> intent to cause harmful or offensive contact
Specific Intent
multiple intents -> specific to crime and outcome
ex. Burglary -> 1) breaking and entering, 2) with intent to commit felony therein
Strict Liability
element that does not require proof of culpability
- public welfare offenses
- statutory rape
if harsh penalty -> not SL & requires MR (unless stated)
Actual Cause
“But-for” cause
without Ds act -> does harm occur?
Substantial Factor Test
(alternate test to “but-for” causation)
two or more Ds conduct have same result
Intervening Cause
- comes after D’s intended act
- independent force produces social harm but only occurs after D’s voluntary act
- Shifts liability
Intervening Cause Factors
1) how substantial of a role did D’s act play? (de minimis cause)
2) was intervening act foreseeable?
3) did D intend consequence?
4) apparent safety doctrine
5) an omission cannot be intervening cause
6) voluntary human intervention might cut causation and eliminate criminal liability
MPC Mistake of Fact
1) ignorance of mistake must negate MR required for offense
2) state of mind established by ignorance must constitute defense
CL Mistake of Fact
General Intent Crimes
- reasonable and negates culpability
Specific Intent Crimes
- negates specified MR
CL Mistake of Law
1) reasonable reliance on official statement of law
- statute, judicial decisions, or official’s interpretation
2) when mistake negates MR required for crime
- stealing back your car from mechanic not knowing of mechanic lien law
CL Murder
Unlawful killing of another human with malice aforethought.
- intent to kill
- felony murder
- intent GBI
- Extreme Recklessness
Stat. Modification Murder
1st Degree
- WDP intent
- 5 enumerated FM
2nd Degree
- non-WDP intent
- GBI
- extreme reckless
- other FM
MPC Murder
- purposefully or knowingly;
- recklessly; depraved heart (extreme indifference to value of human life)
Malice Aforethought
1) Intent to kill
2) intent to GBI
3) depraved -heart murder
- wanton and willful disregard of human life
4) FM rule
Felony Murder Rule
1st Degree
- robbery, burglary, rape, arson, kidnapping
2nd Degree
- other inherently dangerous felonies