crim and crim pro Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

bigamy

A

strict liability crime: the act of marrying while legally married to another.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

mistake of fact defense

A

strict liability - never a defense
specific intent - honest mistake negates specific intent
general intent - honest and reasonable mistake negates mens rea

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Felony Murder Agency Theory vs. Proximate Cause Theory

A

Agency theory (majority) - D responsible for deaths caused by co-felons

proximate cause theory (minority rule) - D responsible for deaths caused by any person.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

defense to attempt crime - impossibility

A

legal - intended act would not be criminal if completed
factual - unknown condition prevent the completion of intended crime - NOT A DEFENSE

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Burglary

A

unlawful entry
of a structure or building
with a specific intent to
commit a crime

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

accomplice liability

A
  • aids or abets another before or during a crime;
  • with the specific intent that encouraged the crime be completed
  • slight aid or encouragement suffice, even when such assistance is not ultimately necessary to commit the crime.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Larceny

A
  • Trespassory taking and carrying away of
  • the personal property of another
  • with the specific intent to
  • permanently deprive the person of the property
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

false pretense

A
  • obtains title to another’s property by
  • knowingly misrepresenting a material fact
  • with the specific intent to defraud
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Forgery

A
  • the making of a false writing of apparent legal significance with
  • the specific intent to defraud
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

common law conspiracy

A

bilateral approach - meeting of the minds

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fourth Amendment

A

The Fourth Amendment protects against unreasonable searches and seizures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is a search?

A

search occurs when the government:
- physically intrudes upon a constitutionally protected area to obtain information or
- invades a person’s subjective expectation of privacy that society would deem reasonable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Exceptions to Warrant Requirement

A

**SAD SPACES
**1. search incident to arrest
2. administrative search
3. stop and frisk
4. plain view
5. automobile exception
6. consent
7. exigent circumstance
8. special government purpose

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Racial Discrimination in Grand Jury Selection

A
  • A defendant indicted by a grand jury that excluded members of a racial group may raise an equal protection challenge—even if the defendant is not a member of the excluded group.
  • If the appellate court finds that there was deliberate discrimination in the selection of grand jurors, automatic reversal of the conviction is required.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

When is Sixth Amendment right to counsel triggered?

A
  • automatically attaches when formal judicial proceedings have commenced (e.g., indictment, preliminary hearing, arraignment) and
  • guarantees that criminal defendants will have the assistance of counsel during all **critical stages **of prosecution—i.e., any event where the absence of counsel may prejudice the defendant’s right to a fair trial.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What are the critical stages that require the presence of an attorney under the 6th Amendment?

A
  1. Post-indictment: lineups, in-person identifications, interrogations
  2. arraignments, preliminary hearings, bail hearings, pretrial motions
  3. plea negotiations and hearings
  4. trial and sentencing
17
Q

What are the noncritical stages that do not require the presence of an attorney?

A
  1. precharge lineups
  2. photo-array ID
  3. fingerprinting, handwriting, blood samples
  4. initial appearances, hearings to determine probable cause to detain D
  5. discretionary appeals
  6. post-conviction proceedings (parole or probation hearing)
18
Q

Imposing death penalty on a felony-murder accomplice

A
19
Q

curtilage

A

a constitutionally protected area since it immediately surrounds and is closely associated with a person’s home.

Police have an implied license to briefly intrude upon a person’s front curtilage in the same manner as an ordinary visitor (e.g., to knock on the front door to speak with the homeowner).

However, entering the curtilage in an unusual manner for an uncommon purpose (e.g., to conduct a dog sniff for drugs) constitutes a Fourth Amendment search and must be supported by a warrant.

20
Q

When is a warrantless search incident to arrest permitted?

A

General Rule: person has been lawfully arrested and search limited to person’s body & areas within immediate reach.

Vehicle search: if it is reasonable to believe that evidence relevant to crime of arrest may be found therein, even if vehicle is outside of person’s immediate control.

21
Q

Search warrant requirements

A

(1) be issued by a neutral and detached magistrate based on probable cause, (2) be supported by a sworn oath or affidavit, and (3) describe the place to be searched and the items to be seized with particularity.

22
Q

Mandatory presumptions - compel the fact finder to reach a conclusion

A

Mandatory presumptions cannot be used against a criminal defendant to establish an element of the charged crime.

23
Q

“plain view” doctrine

A

officer properly executing a warrant has authority to seize the evidence not particularly described if:
1. the officer is lawfully on the premises; and
2. the incriminating character of the item is immediately apparent; and
3. the officer has lawful access to the item.

24
Q

admissibility of in-court identification testimony

A
25
Q

school searches

A
26
Q

warrantless search of passenger in the vehicle

A

Police must have probable cause to believe that evidence is on the passenger before searching the passenger.

27
Q

Exclusionary Rule

A
  • an unlawful arrest generally requires suppression of evidence obtained as a result of that arrest.
  • Exception: an incriminating statement made after an unlawful arrest is admissible if the connection between the arrest and the statement is so attenuated that the statement is considered voluntary.
  • look to: length of time, flagrancy of the police misconduct, intervening events, etc.
28
Q

checkpoint

A

**must serve special law enforcement need:
*** the stop’s primary law enforcement purpose was to elicit evidence to help police apprehend individuals other than the vehicle’s occupants (here, to apprehend a murderer)

  • the stop significantly advanced a public concern (here, solving a murder) and
  • the police tailored the checkpoint to fit important criminal investigatory needs and to minimally interfere with Fourth Amendment rights (here, the checkpoint stops were brief)
29
Q

Can police search a person who is on the premise but not named in the warrant?

A

No without independent justification.

30
Q

The Sixth Amendment provides a constitutional right to counsel in any case in which the defendant is sentenced to incarceration

A

The failure to provide counsel at trial results in automatic reversal of a conviction.

30
Q

What constitutes interrogation?

A

Interrogation refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions that the police know or should know are likely to elicit an incriminating response.

31
Q

Right to a jury trial

A

for offenses that carry an authorized sentence of more than six months, regardless of the actual penalty imp[osed.

32
Q

prima facie case for jury selection

A

a defendant must show that: (i) the group excluded is a distinctive group in the community; (ii) the group was not fairly represented in the venire from which the jury was selected; and (iii) the underrepresentation resulted from a systematic exclusion of the group.