Creation of Wills + Intestacy Flashcards

1
Q

Will

A

Document executed by a testator/testatrix that takes effect at testator’s death
Usually re: property, but not necessarily

Includes codicil or testamentary instrument that:
-Appoints an executor OR
- Nominates a guardian OR
-Revokes or revises prior will OR
Expressly excludes or limits the right of an individual or class to succeed in intestate succession (negative will)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Requirements for Wills

A

1) Testamentary capacity
AND
2) Testamentary intent
AND
3) Compliance w/ appropriate formalities

Also applies to codicils, but can mix + match–ex. formal will, holographic codicil

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Testamentary Capacity

A

Of sound mind at time will executed (low bar)
= have ability to understand
1) Nature, condition and extent of testator’s property AND
2) Nature of the disposition that testator making of his/her property AND
3) Names of and testator’s relationship to the natural objects of testator’s bounty

Most jx: must be 18+

Insane delusion can invalidate, but only to extent product/caused by delusion (think aliens are tracking you, will your UFO books to cousin–prob. fine–no causation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Insane Delusion

A

Irrational belief with no basis in reality

Can invalidate a will/soundness of mind–but only to extent that gift/action product of the delusion

Having eccentric opinions, unique behavior (“I wear a tinfoil hat so the FBI can’t track me”) ≠ no capacity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Testamentary Intent

A

Must be present intent–intent that document under discussion = will

“I’m going to make a will and leave A this”–invalid

Void if:
1) Undue Influence
2) Fraud
3) Mistake

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Undue Influence In General

A

In general: show
1) Wrongdoer exerted enough influence over testator that overcame testator’s free will AND
2) The influence caused testator to make a donative transfer testator would not have otherwise made

Presumption if:
1) Wrongdoer in confidential relationship with testator AND
2) Suspicious circumstances surrounding the prep, formulation or execution of will

Prove u. infl. –> void parts of will that benefit person exerting u. infl.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Confidential relationship re: undue influence

A

Broadly defined–can include children, spouses, caretakers, etc.,
Includes any relationship where testator relies on others for day-to-day affairs (ex. caretakers)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Suspicious Circumstances

A

Totality of the circ., ex.:
1) If testator in weakened condition physically/mentally, + susceptible
2) Extent of influencer in prep./procurement of will
3) If testator got indep. advice from attorney, disinterested advisor
4) If will prepared secretly/ in haste
5) If testator’s attitude to others changed due to rel. w/ influencer
6) If continuity of purpose through former wills (shows settled intent)
7) If r. person would regard as unjust, unnatural, unfair
NOT mere fact kids treated unequally/cut out

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Presumption of Undue Influence

A

1) Wrongdoer in confidential relationship with testator AND
2) Suspicious circumstances surrounding the preparation, formulation or execution of will

Shown by clear and convincing evidence**–> burden on other party to show not u. influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Fraud in the execution

A

Fraud re: nature of the contents or writing itself
Extrinsic– Is this document I’m signing a will? (ex. slip into stack of papers, say important loan docs)

Result = invalidate whole will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Fraud in the inducement

A

Intrinsic fraud re: facts that caused will to be written x way

Test: Would testator have made gift if knew the truth?

Must show:
1) Made knowingly false representation
2) For purpose of getting testator to make favorable will AND
3) Testator made different will than would have as a result of misrepresentation

Result = excise parts tainted by fraud–fall into residue or intestacy
Whole will tainted = invalidate will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of Mistake

A

1) In the execution–re: nature of doc–what type of thing signing (ex. think it is doctor’s note)
Result = will invalid
2) In the inducement–re: mistake re true facts that causes testator to make/not make will/clause
Result = no relief (v. v. rarely, if c+c evidence re: testator’s intent, may reform)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Formal Will Requirements

A

Formal (non-holographic) =
1) In writing AND
2) Signed by the testator OR in testator’s name w/ proper procedure AND
3) Witnessed or Attested/Acknowledged

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

In writing

A

Any reasonably permanent physical record
NOT electronic (v. few jx allow)
Broad def.–can be eggshells, fender, stucco interior of hotel room

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Signature/Signed Req.

A

Anything made with intent to authenticate– indicates testator’s intent that document be will or mark is sig (ex. initial, “mom,” X, sometimes thumbprint)
Not req to be in particular place (ex. end, beginning)

Also valid if 1) in testator’s name, 2) in T’s conscious presence AND 3) at testator’s direction
Conscious presence CAN be w/in earshot–CANNOT be on phone
CAN be assisted signature
CANNOT be guided signature

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Assisted v. Guided Signature

A

Assisted = assistance re: sig, but testator motivating force = OK
Guided–grabbing hand, moving pen for testator–might not be OK

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Witnessed or Attested/Acknowledged Req.

A

1) Signed by at least 2 ppl, AND each signed w/in r. time of a) seeing T sign will OR b) T’s acknowledgement of sig. OR c) T’s acknowledgement of will (= witnessed)
OR
2) Acknowledged by testator before a notary public or other authorized individ. (= attested/acknowledged)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Witnessed

A

1) Signed by at least 2 ppl AND
2) Each signed w/in r. time of seeing T sign OR T’s acknowledgement of sig OR T’s acknowledgement of will

R. time ≠ before T’s death–can be OK if after (ex. deathbed)
Still valid if witnesses don’t sign in each other’s presence–can sign at diff. times, if w/in r. time

No publication required–DO NOT have to know signing will, read will, be specifically requested to sign

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Contemporaneous Acts Rule

A

Some jx have–allows witnesses to sign before T signs IF acting with same event, act or time frame
Idea–like wills, want to encourage them to be valid

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Attested/Acknowledged

A

Acknowledged by testator before notary public OR other individual authorized by law to take acknowledgements

Alt to witnesses–notary stands in lieu
NOT SAME as having notary involved in self-proving will–diff. role

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Harmless Error Rule re: Wills

A

Even if defective/failed attempt, will be validated IF proponent of doc. proves by clear and convincing evidence that T intended doc to be T’s will

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Integration Rule

A

Any pieces of paper present at execution that are intended to be part of will will actually be part of will
(i.e.–don’t need to sign/execute every page of will)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Witness Competence

A

Have ability to 1) observe testator affix signature AND 2) comprehend nature of act

Gen.–don’t have to be over 18 to witnessess

24
Q

Interested Witnessess

A

= Witness who is also beneficiary

Maj./UPC–OK if interested–no effect on will (unless undue influence)
UPC–also OK if interested proxy

Min.“purge” int. witness’ share–treat int. witnesses as if predeceased T

25
Probate
Process of "proving" will--burden on proponent to establish T's sig., other formalities (ex. witnesses testifying saw T sign, etc.)
26
Self-proving will
"Proves" itself--**satisfies all will execution reqs w/out the need for testimony** of attesting witnesses in probate Use **self-proving affidavit** (SPA) to make **self-proving will** N/A if evidence of fraud, forgery
27
How to create self-proving will
Simultaneous: 1) Will **simultaneously executed + attested** by 2) **acknowledgement of T and affidavits of attesting witnesses** (**self-proving affidavit--SPA**) AND 4) each SPA made **before officer auth. to admin. oaths** AND 5) evidenced by **officer's certificate under official seal** Retroactive: 1) **acknowledgement of testator and affidavits of attesting witnesses any time after** AND 2) made **before auth. officer** 3) evidenced by officer **cert. under seal**
28
Self-proving affidavit
SPA--**way to create self-proving will**--lessen/avoid probate, "proving" Basically: "this is how it went, we signed our names as valid witnesses/testator, I swear to this before notary under seal" NOT same as having notary stand in lieu of witness to make formal will Have will + SPA, w/ signatures only on SPA (ex. stapled to will) = OK, will still valid
29
Holographic Will
**Handwritten will**--**no witnesses req.** UPC: Valid if **material portions + signature** in **T's handwriting** (traditionally--fully handwritten) **Material** = **distributing $$ + prop**--"who gets what" Most jx allow holographic wills
30
Contract to Make/Not Make/Not Revoke Will or Devise
ONLY IF 1) **Provisions of will** state **material conditions of contract** OR 2) **express reference in will to contract** AND **extrinsic evidence proving terms** OR 3) **Writing signed by decedent evincing** **Minority**--joint will or mutual will = presumption of contract, can't modify w/out mutual consent
31
Remedy for violation of contract to make/not make/not modify will
**Sue for breach ONLY** **CANNOT stop probate of new will** Change will in violation of contract - **new will is valid, can't challenge**--but **can sue for damages, specific performance** in sep. action
32
Foreign Will
Includes out-of-state, not just foreign country Valid if 1) Comply w/ all will formalities of jx OR harmless error OR 2) Comply w/ rules at **time + place of execution** OR 3) Comply w/ rules of place where testator **domiciled/had a residence/is a national of** at **time of death**
33
Choice of law re: Validity of Wills
Common law--if conflict b/tween law of where executed + where domiciled when died--> law of place where domiciled when died controls
34
Will Copies
Generally--no legal significance on own--need original Exception = **Executed copy**--copy **testator signs**--treated same as original
35
Specific Bequest
Gift by will of **personal property** that: 1) **Can be ID'd and distinguished** from **all other things** of same kind AND 2) **Is satisfied only by delivery** "*My* ring," "*my pigeon," *my* 1st edition LOTR, *my* 100 shares" -**Can't sub. replacement**--no flexibility
36
Specific Devise
Gift by will of **real property** that: 1) **Can be ID'd and distinguished** from **all other things** of same kind AND 2) **Is satisfied only by delivery** Ex. "*my* farm," "*my* house"
37
General Legacy
Gift **payable from gen. assets of T's estate** and **not separated/distinguished** from other things of same kind *Usually* **cash, stock, acreage** Ex. "100 shares of stock," "$100 worth of gold coins" If not in estate, **can satisfy** if **purchase + give** OR **give value of what would be worth** (vs. specific)
38
Specific bequest/devise vs. general legacy
**Specific** = **only satisfied** by **that thing**--look for **"my"** **General** = OK if **substitute/obtain equivalent** OR **transfer value** (what would be worth) "My 100 shares of stock" = can't go out and buy shares after death, give (vs. "100 shares"--can buy OR give value of stock) "A first edition LOTR" vs. "my first edition LOTR", "100 gold coins vs. my 100 gold coins"
39
Total Intestacy
Either never made a will, or tried to make a will but failed (invalid document *and* can't be saved by harmless error, valid will + revoked, will successfully challenged, etc.) Even today--most people die intestate
40
Partial Intestacy
Will does not cover all of testator's estate (due to terms, lapse, no residual clause, etc.) Ex. "my car to A, my house to B" = all other assets distrib. via intestacy
41
General Intestacy Guidelines
Goal--what would most ppl want most of time? (or what do legislators think most ppl want most of time?) Usually--surviving spouse takes some--but amt. depends on what other relatives left alive Gen: Spouse gets more if look like will care for T's remaining relatives--in-laws, stepchildren = loyalty more divided--spouse gets less, trust less
42
General Sequence re: Intestacy Priorities
Spouse-->descendants-->parents-->descendants of parents (siblings)-->grandparents-->descendants of grandparents-->next of kin-->escheat to state
43
UPC Intestacy: Surviving Spouse + No surviving descendants or parents
UPC = majority, (25+) Spouse takes whole estate
44
UPC Intestacy: Surviving Spouse + Surviving Descendants (all from spouse + decedent--no stepkids, either side)
Spouse takes whole estate
45
UPC Intestacy: Surviving Spouse + Parents, but no descendants
Spouse takes first 300K + 3/4 of remaining balance Rest to surviving parents equally
46
UPC Intestacy: Surviving Spouse + surviving descendants from decedent and spouse + surviving spouse has own descendants (i.e.--decedent has stepkids plus children with spouse)
Spouse takes first 225K + 1/2 of remaining balance Rest to decedent's descendants
47
UPC Intestacy: Surviving Spouse + descendants who are not from spouse ("wicked stepmother" scenario)
Spouse takes first 150K + 1/2 of remaining balance Rest to decedent's descendants
48
Intestacy + No Surviving spouse
To decedent's descendants "by representation" (3 ways to do)
49
Intestacy and "By Representation"
3 options 1) **Pure/strict *per stirpes*** (older, least common today) 2) **Modern/modified *per stirpes*** (newer, most common today) 3) **Per capita by representation** at each generation (UPC) Key: Look at **levels** and **live roots**
50
Pure/Strict *Per Stirpes* Representation
Old rule--least common today/modernly Steps 1) **Always start** at **child level** (even if all kids predeceased) 2) Count **live roots** (i.e. which have **still living line**?) 3) **Divide down** (each root gets = amount, divide down re: survivors--if member of root deceased, split share among member's kids)
51
Modern *Per Stirpes* Representation
Started around 1970s--most common modernly Steps 1) Start at **first level w/ at least one living member** (vs. pure--always start at child level) 2) Count **live roots** (i.e. which have **still living line**?) 3) **Divide down** (each root gets = amount, divide down re: survivors--if member of root deceased, split share among member's kids)
52
Per Capita By Representation/With Representation At Each Generation
UPC method 1) Start at **first level w/ at least one living member** 2) Count **live roots** (i.e. which have **still living line**?) 3) Distribute **1 share to each live person in generation/level** (2 out of 3 alive = both get 1/3) 4) **Combine remainder** and **distribute equally at next gen** (3 out of 5 alive = get 1/5, 2/5 remainder distributed among all of next gen)
53
Intestacy + No Surviving Spouse or Descendants
Surviving parents take equally
54
Intestacy + No Surviving Spouse, Parents, or Descendants
Descendants of decedent's parents (i.e. siblings, half-siblings, step-siblings) take **by representation** Min consider degree of blood-relatedness (consanguinity)--not maj.
55
Intestacy + No surviving spouse, descendants, parents, descendants of parents
Grandparents take by representation Grandparents dead = children of grandparents take by rep.
56
Intestacy + No surviving spouse, descendants, parents, siblings, grandparents, descendants of grands
Either next closest related by blood or escheats to state