Covenants Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Business efficacy in implied covenants

A

Hafton Properties v Camp

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Reasonable precautions to avoid disturbance to the tenant with repairs, as part of Implied Covenant for Quiet Enjoyment

A

Century Projects v Alacantar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Implied Covenant Not to Derogate from Grant

A

Chartered Trust v Davies (pawnbrokers next door that drove off business)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Disposition Covenants: Classification

A

Absolute Prohibition
A fully qualified prohibition
A qualified prohibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Statute stating the landlord won’t unreasonably hold back consent of assignee

A

Landlord and Tenant Act 1927

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

2 ways around the statute

A

“Surrender back” clause. For assignee the tenant must surrender the lease
Absolute prohibition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statute speeding up landlords decision; imposes liability in damages for a breach of statutory duty.

A

Landlord and Tenant Act 1988

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Landlords in breach of LTA 1988

A

Mount Eden Land v Folia

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case were tenants failed because of illegal subletting

A

EON UK v Gilesports

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Extension to “reasonable time” due to difficult issues etc

A

NCR v Riverland Portfolio No1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

No preset list of what is reasonable and what is not

A

Ashworth Frazer v Gloucester City Council

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Refuse consent to protect themselves from undesirable tenants

A

International Drilling Fluids v Louisville Investments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Refusing consent due assignee being a “direct and proximate competitor” to the landlord

A

Whiteminster Estates v Hodges Menswear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly