Court procedures (mods 8-11) Flashcards
What commences the action
Filing the complaint
Complaint must contain
- Statement of grounds of subject matter jurisdiction
- A short and plain statement of the claim showing that the plaintiff is entitled to relief, and
- A demand for relief sought
- Does not need to allege grounds for PJ or venue
Details in a complaint
Plaintiff must plead sufficient facts to support a plausible claim
- enough detail to strike judge - hard to test because subjective
When determining plausibility, the judge uses her own experience and common sense
Special pleading reqs
Fraud, mistake and special damages must be pleaded with more detail - particularity or specificity
Defendant’s response to the complaint
Rule 12 requires that the defendant respond in one of two ways
- by motion, or
- by answer
Defendant must respond no later than 21 days after being served
- if the defendant waived service, the defendant has 60 days from when the plaintiff mailed the waiver form to respond
Motion for more definitie statement
Rule 12(e) motion for more definite statement is used when the complaint is so vague or ambiguous the defendant simply cannot respond
This must be made before answering
Very rare on bar
Motion to strike
Rule 12(f) motion to strike asks the court to remove redundant or immaterial things from a pleading
Any party can move to strike
Waivable defenses
Some Rule 12(b) defenses are waived if not put in the first Rule 12 response (motion or answer):
-Lack of personal jurisdiction
-Improper venue
-Improper process (a problem with the papers), and
-Improper service of process
Nonwaivable defenses
Some Rule 12(b) defenses are not waived even if they are not included in the first response:
- A failure to state a claim and a failure to join an indispensable party (can be made as late as trial)
- A lack of subject matter jurisdiction (can be waived at any time)
Lack of subject matter jurisdiction
Can never happen
Cannot be waived
A court without SMJ cannot act, so any act done without it is void
Denial of Rule 12 motion
If defendant makes a motion as first appearance and it is denied, the defendant must serve answer within 14 days after the notice of the denial
What defense can be raised at any time
Lack of jurisdiction over subject matter
What defense is waived if it is not raised in defendants first Rule 12 response
Lack of personal jurisdiction
improper venue
insufficiency of process
insufficiency of service of process
What defenses can be raised at any time before trial or at trial
Failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted
Failure to join a party under Rule 19
Defendant’s answer generally
An answer is a pleading and it does two things:
- Respond to allegations in the complaint
- admit or deny
- or state that has insufficient knowledge - Raise affirmative defenses
Insufficient knowledge in answer
Defendant can admit or deny, or state that she has insufficient knowledge to admit or deny
This has the effect of a denial, but a party cannot do this if the answer to the allegation is in her control
Failure to deny an allegation in the answer
Defendant’s failure to deny an allegation in their answer is an admission
Except regarding the amount of damages
Affirmative defenses
Affirmative defenses inject a new fact into the case that would allow the defendant to win
Classic affirmative defenses
- Statute of Limitations
- Statute of Frauds
- Res judicata
- self-defense
All Rule 12(b) defenses can be pleaded as affirmative defenses
No response by plaintiff is required - allegations are deemed denied
Right to amend
The plaintiff has a right to amend her complaint once as of course no later than 21 days after the defendant serves her first Rule 12 response
The defendant has a right to amend his answer once as of course no later than 21 days of serving it
Defendants amendment and waivable defenses
If the defendant’s first response was an answer, in which he forgot to raise waivable defenses and forgot to raise an affirmative defense, he has a right to amend his answer to include the waivable defenses and the affirmative defense
But must still be done in 21 days
Amendment after right to amend has expired
After the period to amend as of right, the amending party must seek leave of court (or get the written consent of the opposing party)
The court will grant leave to amend if justice so requires
- length of delay
- prejudice to the other party
- futility of amendment
Amendment and Variance
Only at trial - When the evidence at trial does not match what was pleaded
If the other party fails to object at trial, the party introducing the evidence may move to amend the complaint to conform to the evidence
Amend the complaint to conform to the evidence
Amendment to join a claim not originally asserted - SOL
An amended pleading relates back if the pleading concerns the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence as the original pleading
Relation back means treat the amended pleading as though it was filed when the original was filed, so it can avoid a SOL problem
Amendment to change a defendant
Only use when the plaintiff sued the wrong defendant first, but the right defendant knew about it
The amendment will relate back if
- the amendment concerns the same conduct, transaction, or occurrence as the original
- the defendant had such knowledge of the case such that she will be able to avoid prejudice, and
- the defendant knew or should have known that, but for a mistake, she would have been named originally
The knowledge in the last two must have come within the period for service of process (90 days after the filing of the complaint)
Supplemental pleadings
Supplemental pleadings set forth things that happened after the pleadings were filed
No right to file a supplemental pleading
Must make a motion and whether the motion is granted is within the discretion of the trial court
Rule 11
Rule 11 applies to all papers except discovery
When the lawyer or pro se party signs documents, she certifies that to the best of her knowledge and belief, after reasonable inquiry,
- the paper is not for an improper purpose
- the legal contentions are warranted by law or a non-frivolous argument for a law change; and
- the factual contentions and denials of factual contentions have evidentiary support or are likely to after further investigation
A party must make this certification every time she presents a position to the court
- continuing certification: when party later advocates a position taken in the previous document
Rule 11 violations - Sanctions
Purpose is to deter a repeat of the conduct, not to punish
If there is a violation, like the assertion of a baseless claim, sanctions may be imposed against the party, the lawyer, and/or the lawyer’s firm
The court can also raise Rule 11 violations on its own motion
- issue an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed
Regardless of who filed the motion, before imposing a sanction, the court must give the sanctioned party an opportunity to be heard
Types of Sanctions
Often, courts impose non-monetary sanctions
Monetary sanctions are paid to the court, not to the other party, if imposed
Safe harbor provision to sanctions
If the other party violates Rule 11, the opposing party cannot immediately file a motion for sanctions
The party serves the motion on the other parties, but does not file it with the court yet
The party in violation has a safe harbor of 21 days to fix the problem to avoid sanctions
- If she does not do so, then the motion can be filed with the court
Claim joinder by plaintiff
The plaintiff may join any additional claim she has against that adverse party, even if the additional claim is unrelated to the original claim
There must be subject matter jurisdiction over the claim
Claims by multiple plaintiffs or against multiple defendants
Must
- arise from the same transaction or occurrence, and
- raise at least one common question of law or fact
Necessary and indispensable parties generally
When the court might force some nonparty absentee to join in the case
Step 1: is the absentee necessary/required?
Step 2: if the absentee is necessary, can the absentee be joined?
Step 3: If the absentee can’t be joined, can the case proceed anyway?
Necessary / Required party?
A party will be a necessary / required party if:
- without the absentee, the court cannot accord complete relief among the existing parties, or
- the absentee’s interest may be harmed if she is not joined, or
- the absentee claims an interest that subjects a party (usually the defendant) to a risk of multiple obligations
Joint tortfeasors are never necessary
Necessary party feasible to join
If the absentee is a necessary party, a court will join the party if joinder is feasible
Joinder is feasible if:
- there is PJ over the absentee; and
- there will be federal SMJ over the claim by or against the absentee. The court will align the absentee as a plaintiff or defendant based on their interests for purposes of diversity
Bulge rule
Bulge Rule
For necessary parties and impleader
If the individual is served within a district of the US and not more than 100 miles from where the summons was issued, there is PJ
Otherwise, need traditional contacts-based PJ
Necessary party not feasible
If the absentee / necessary party cannot be joined, court must determine whether the party is indispensable
If indispensable, dismiss the case. If not indispensable, can proceed without the necessary party
Indispensable party
Court will consider factors to determine whether the party is an indispensable party:
- alternative forum available
- actual likelihood of harm to the absentee, and
- whether court can shape relief to avoid such harm to the absentee
Can the action proceed in equity and good conscience without absentee?
Counterclaims
Claim joinder by the defendant
A counterclaim is a claim against an opposing party
Two types
There must always be SMJ over them
Plaintiff response to counterclaim
After the defendant serves a counterclaim against the plaintiff, the plaintiff must respond under Rule 12 within 21 days of service of the counterclaim
Compulsory counterclaim
A compulsory counterclaim arises from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim
Unless the counterclaimant has already filed the claim in another case, she must file the compulsory counterclaim in the pending case or the claim is waived
Only comes into play when an answer is required
Permissive counterclaims
A permissive counterclaim is one that does not arise from the same transaction or occurrence as the plaintiff’s claim
Doesn’t lose right to file it if not filed in the action
Crossclaims
A crossclaim is a claim against a coparty
In order to assert it, it must arise from the same transaction or occurrence as the underlying action
Not compulsory
Impleader generally
Defending party (third-party plaintiff) is bringing in a new party (third-party defendant)
An impleader claim is used to shift to the third party defendant the liability that the defendant will owe to the plaintiff
So if the defendant is found liable to the plaintiff, he will try to get the TPD to pay all or part of his own liability
Look for claims for indemnity or contribution
Permissive, so does not need to bring it in the current case
Indemnity and contribution
Claims to look out for for impleader
Indemnity shifts liability completely
Contribution shifts it pro-rata
Process for impleading
To implied a third party, the defendant must
- file a third-party complaint naming the TPD, and
- Have that complaint formally served
Right to implied within 14 days of serving the answer. After that, need court permission
TPD and Plaintiff
After the TPD is joined, the plaintiff may assert claims against the TP, and the TPD may assert claims against the plaintiff
Ones that arise out of the same transaction or occurrence as the underlying case
SMJ required
Intervention generally
A nonparty absentee uses intervention to bring herself into the case, either as pl or defendant
Application to intervene must be timely
Intervention as of right or permissive
Need SMJ
Intervention of Right
If the absentee’s interest may be harmed if she is not joined, and that interest is not adequately represented by the current parties, intervention is of right
Basically same test for necessary parties
Permissive intervention
If the absentee’s claim or defense and the pending case have at least one common question of law or fact, intervention would be permissive and discretionary with the court
Usually allowed unless it would cause delay or prejudice to someone
Interpleader generally
Interpleader applies if separate actions might result in double liability against a stakeholder
Person/stakeholder requires two or more adverse claimants to the stake to litigate among themselves to determine which has the valid claim
Rule 22 interpleader and statutory interpleader
Rule 22 Interpleader
Requires complete diversity or federal question claim
Normal service and venue rules
Statutory interpleader
Only diversity between any two contending claimants and $500 in issue
Service may be nationwide
Venue proper where any claimant resides
Class actions generally
Initial requirements (all four must be met):
- numerosity
- commonality
- typicality
- representative adequate
One of the three groups:
- type 1, prejudice
- type 2, injunctive or declaratory relief
- type 3, common question or damages
Numerosity
Too many class members for practicable joinder
No magic number