court participants and jury trials Flashcards
what are the 4 main court participants
1). Litigants,
2). Lawyers,
3). Judges,
4). Juries
what are litigants
- Litigants are (obviously) the disputants—individuals, organizations,
and government officials—trying to settle disagreements
what are the 2 types of litigants
1). One-shotters
2). Repeat players
what are lawyers
- Lawyers are people who practices or study law in the form of an
attorney or advisor. - They dispense of advice about legal rules and how those rules apply
to specific issues in a dispute. - They also advise on whether a particular dispute warrants judicial
intervention
what are judges
- They are public officials appointed to decide cases in a court of law.
- They should be impartial and not have a conflict of interest in a case
- They are administrators of a court and in non-jury cases they
interpret the rules that govern proceedings - They adjudicate (except in jury trials)
- In Canada judges are ex-practicing lawyers (they undergo no formal
training)
what are juries
- Juries are a body of people (typically 12) sworn to give a verdict in a
legal case on the basis of evidence presented to them. - Juries are used in Common Law countries (those using the Adversarial
system) - In Canada juries are used in criminal trials and sometimes civil trials
- In Canada those accused of crimes where the punishment is 5 years+
have the right to request a trial by jury
who eligible for jury duty
“In general, all Canadian citizens who are between 18 and 65 (or 69) years of
age, who have not been convicted of an indictable [SERIOUS] offence (or
have received a pardon for an indictable offence) and who are free from any
mental or physical disability that might impede their performance as a juror,
are considered qualified to serve on a jury.”
what professions are exempted from jury duty
lawyers, judges, law students, police
officers, doctors, coroners, dentists, vets and members of the armed forces
(among others)
what are the two processes of jury selection
1). Computerized random selectors are applied to voter registration lists and
provincial lists of Medicare beneficiaries (among others).
2). The initial list of people from 1). undergoes further scrutiny in court…
Some argue that once a jury has been selected within a court, the case has
already been decided (Davies & Emshwiller, 2006) because—based on
demographic/personal characteristics—it is possible to select a jury for a
case that is likely to be sympathetic or unsympathetic to one side…
why are jurors questioned in court before a case proceeds
1). Questioning can instigate a positive relationship with a prospective
juror that can increase the chances of them siding with a lawyer (and
their case)
2). Questioning (again) can ferret out and then result in the rejection of
potentially biased jurors or detect potentially advantageous bias within
them, with lawyers then trying to retain them
what is scientific jury selection
It is where lawyers, based on the advice of social scientists, use
certain strategies to identify jurors likely to be sympathetic to their
case
where critiques of jury selection
1). It attempts to rig the jury in one’s favour thereby
potentially undermining the adversarial system of
justice
2). It is very expensive so it offers a significant
advantage to rich defendants
what are concerns about jury trials
- bias
- selection isn’t random enough
- Some critics believe randomly selected juries are typically not smart
enough to assess the evidence or remain impartial