Court Cases Test 1 Flashcards

1
Q

Barron v. Baltimore (1833)

A

does the fifth amendment place restrictions on the state gov’t. it was ruled that no it does not. it only places limitations on the national gov’t. It was argued that the supreme court had no jurisdiction since the the fifth amendment only applies to the federal gov’t.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Palko v. Connecticut(1937-38)

A

Palko was tried once and found guilty of second degree murder. He was retried and found guilty of first degree murder. It was believed that the 14th amendment gave protection for freedom of thought and speech, however double jeopardy was not considered a fundamental right.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

A

he question was whether it was constitutionally sound to give financial aid to “church related educational institutions”. The court ruled that it was a violation of the first amendment and developed the Lemon Test to which school could receive aid. Schools must have a secular purpose, could not advance nor inhibit religion, and could not entangle gov’t and religious institutions in each others affairs.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

WV Board of Education v. Barnette(1943)

A

The question proposed was whether mandatory flag-saluting in schools was a violation of the First Amendment. This idea was considered a forced unification of ideas and declared unconstitutional.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Schenck v. U.S.(1919)

A

Schenck tried to convince people to dodge the draft during WWI. The question for the court was whether or not his speech was protected by the First Amendment. Apparently the court decided that his speech was not protected in this case. It was said that this constituted a clear and present danger to security. Which I believe is complete and utter B.S.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Near v. Minnesota(1930)

A

Near published a list of politicians he believed to be “in bed” with mobsters. A “gag law” was established to protect people from scandalous accusations. The court ruled that this law was a violation of the First Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

NY Times v. U.S. (1971)

A

this was known as the “Pentagon Papers” case. The NY Times published secret, stolen Defense Department documents. The Nixon Administration tried to prevent this publication. The court overruled this saying it was protected by the first amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

A

An illegal police search provided evidence against Mapp for possessing obscene materials. The court ruled that such evidence was a violation of the Fourth Amendment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Benton v. Maryland(1968)

A

the supreme court overruled its decision in Palko v. Connecticut (1938). It made the 14th amendment included double jeopardy. It also said that states cannot refuse rights to criminal defendants.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Miranda v. Arizona(1966)-

A

it was ruled that by not notifying a criminal of their rights to counsel and protection from self incrimination was a violation of the Fifth Amendment. It gave rise to Miranda Rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright(1963)

A

Gideon was denied representation in his B and E case which the courts declared a violation of his Sixth Amendment rights, the right to counsel.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Furman v. Georgia(1972)

A

the question here was whether capital punishment was considered “cruel and unusual” punishment and whether it violated the Eighth Amendment. The court ruled that it was in violation and forced the gov’t to rethink its policy on capital punishment.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Gregg v. Georgia(1976)

A

court ruled that capital punishment was ok.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Atkins v. Virginia(2002)

A

declared it unconstitutional to execute mentally retarded people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Roper v. Simmons (2005)

A

declared it unconstitutional to execute minors.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Griswold v. Connecticut (1965)

A

Griswold was the director of Planned Parenthood and was prosecuted for advising couples in the use of contraceptives. The court ruled that although privacy is not specifically stated in the constitution, the First, Third, Fourth, and Ninth amendments together create a “zone” of privacy.

17
Q

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A

Abortion. Declared abortion constitutionally legal.

18
Q

Bowers v. Hardwick (1986)

A

declared states could have laws against sodomy.

19
Q

Lawrence v. Texas (2003)

A

overruled Bowers v. Hardwick, making it unconstitutional to make laws against same sex sex.

20
Q

Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)

A

Plessy was arrested for not sitting in the “blacks” section of a bus despite being “7/8” caucasian. Gave rise to the idea of separate but equal.

21
Q

Brown v. Board of Education (1954)

A

stated that segregating schools based on school was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. Said that minority children were given a feeling of inferiority. Says separate but equal is not equal in the means of public education.

22
Q

UCA Regents v. Bakke (1978)

A

Affirmative action upheld. Quotas and separate admission policies rejected.

23
Q

Gratz v. Bollinger (2003)

A

rejection of “mechanical” point based entry system favoring minorities. Bakke reaffirmed.

24
Q

Grutter v. Bollinger (2003)

A

U of M could have race conscious admissions policy so long as it could pass strict scrutiny was highly individualized and not mechanical.

25
Q

U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark(1897)

A

said the US could not deny citizenship to anyone born in the US.

26
Q

U.S. v. Virginia (1995)

A

declared it unconstitutional for the VMI to deny women entry to the formerly all male school.