Court Cases - Law Enforcement Flashcards
Spinelli v. United States (1969)
Informants tips are not enough to provide a basis for probable cause
Illinois v. Gates (1983)
“Totality-of-the-circumstances” approach to probable cause was the correct one
Mapp v. Ohio (1961)
All evidence obtained by searches and seizures in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in a state court
Won Sun v. United States (1963)
Verbal evidence collected during an illegal search cannot be used in court*
Nix v. Williams (1984)
Inevitable discovery exception to the exclusionary rule
Terry v. Ohio (1968)
Searches for weapons (pat downs) are allowed under the 4th amendment
Minnesota v. Dickerson (1993)
During a pat down, if an officer can feel plainly that an item is contraband and it is not a weapon, it can be seized
Florida v. Bostick (1991)
Searches on a bus are always unreasonable
Schmerber v. California (1966)
The protection against self-incrimination applied specifically to compelled communications or testimony
Cupp v. Murphy (1973)
Taking physical samples of a suspect without a warrant is not unconstitutional
Wilson v. Arkansas (1995)
Police must knock and announce before entering a house to serve a warrant
Chimel v. California (1969)
Police officers arresting a person at home could not search the entire home without a search warrant, but police may search the area within immediate reach of the person
United States v. Robinson (1973)
In the case of a lawful custodial arrest a full search of the person is not only an exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment, but is also a reasonable search under that Amendment
Bumper v. North Carolina (1968)
Consent to a search must be freely and voluntary given
Schneckloth v. Bustamonte (1973)
Consent searches are constitutional, and that the government must show that consent existed. However, a defendant, under the Fourth Amendment, need not necessarily know of his right to object to a consent search