Court Cases Continued Flashcards

1
Q

Lochner v. New York

A

The Court established a general right to enter freely into contracts as part of business, including the right to purchase and sell labor. The decision made it more difficult for unions to form.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Korematsu v. United States

A

The Court allowed the U.S. government to intern Japanese-Americans in concentration camps during WWII as a safeguard against insurrection or spying.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Brandenburg v. Ohio

A

The Court ruled that inflammatory speech may not be punished by government unless it is likely to incite imminent lawless action.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Kelo v. City of New London

A

The Court upheld the power of local government to seize property for economic development.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Boumediene v. Bush

A

The Court declared that foreign terrorism suspects have the constitutional right to challenge their detention (using the writ of habeas corpus) at the Guantanamo Bay naval base in U.S. courts, even though the detainees are not citizens.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

U.S. v. Lopez

A

forbidding individuals from knowingly carrying a gun in a school zone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Citizens United v. FEC

A

Case about campaign spending by organizations. SCOTUS voted yes, 1st Amendment protects right of organizations to make independent political expenditures. SCOTUS upheld disclosure requirements. Expenditures must be reported to FEC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Near v. Minnesota (1931)

A

set a high legal threshold for government prior restraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Barron v. Baltimore

A

The city of Baltimore had been disposing of sand and gravel near a wharf owned by John Barron, rendering the wharf commercially useless
Barron sued the city of Baltimore of the Fifth Amendment grounds that he had been deprived of property without compensation
The Supreme Court ruled against Barron, stating that the Fifth Amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Lemon v Kurtzman (1971).

A

The Lemon test: Government can be involved with religion if
it has a secular purpose
its effect is neither to advance nor inhibit religion
it does not create excessive entanglement between government and religious institutions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

McDonald v Chicago

A

Court Struck down Chicago gun regulation, applied 2nd Am. to states

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Lawrence v. Texas

A

Court reversed Bowers v. Hardwick, ruled that state laws banning private sexual activity between consenting adults violated right to privacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

A

Court upheld some regulations on abortions as long as the regulations did not create an “undue burden”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Gonzalez v. Oregon

A

the Court upheld an Oregon law that allowed doctors to assist terminally ill patients seeking to end their lives

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Swann v. Charlottee-Mecklenburg Board of Education (1971)

A

Busing is a legal solution to desegregating public schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Miliken v. Bradley (1974)

A

Schools not required to eliminate de facto segregation, only de sure segregation

17
Q

Griggs v. Duke Power (1971)

A

the Court put the burden on employers to show that an employment to show that an employment policy whose effect is discriminatory, even if discrimination was not the intent of the policy, is a “business necessity”

18
Q

Ledbetter v. Goodyear

A

The Court ruled a charge of discrimination must be brought within 180 days of the time the discrimination was alleged to have occurred