Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Zurcher v. Stanford Daily (1978)

A

Proper search warrant could be applied to newspaper as well as anyone else without necessarily violating freedom of the press

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Roth v. US (1957)

A

Obscenity is not protected by first amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Miller v. California (1973)

A

Obscenity is defined by communities, “patently offensive,” “prurient interest,” and “lacking in value”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Near v. Minnesota (1931)

A

First amendment protects newspapers from prior restraint

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Schenck v. US (1919)

A

Govt can limit speech if it presents a “clear and present danger”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Zelman v. Simmons-Harris (2002)

A

Allows states to provide vouchers for tuition for religious schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Engel v. Vitale (1962)

A

Banned public school-sponsored prayer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

School Dist. of Abington Township, PA v. Schempp (1963)

A

Requiring Bible readings violate the establishment clause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Barron v. Baltimore (1833)

A

The bill of rights applies only to national government, not states.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

A

Freedom of speech and press are fundamental rights protected by the due process clause of the fourteenth amendment (incorporation doctrine)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Lemon v. Kurtzman (1971)

A

Established lemon test: 1) secular legislative purpose, 2) have a primary effect that neither advances nor inhibits religion, and 3) does not foster excessive entanglement of government in religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

New York Times v. Sullivan (1964)

A

Must prove malicious intent and reckless disregard for truth to win libel suits

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Miami Herald Publishing Company v. Tornillo (1974)

A

State cannot force newspaper to print replies from candidates it has criticized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Red Lion Broadcasting Company v. FCC (1969)

A

Upheld restrictions on radio and television broadcasting because of limited frequencies available.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

NAACP v. Alabama (1958)

A

NAACP doesn’t have to reveal its membership list

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Mapp v. Ohio (1961)

A

Search and seizure protections apply to state AND federal governments

17
Q

Miranda v. Arizona (1966)

A

Officers must inform arrested people of right to not self-incriminate and to have a lawyer present during questioning

18
Q

Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)

A

Anyone accused of a felony where they may be imprisoned, however poor, has a right to a lawyer

19
Q

Gregg v. Georgia (1976)

A

Death penalty is not cruel and unusual

20
Q

McCleskey v. Kemp (1987)

A

Dismissed allegations that the death penalty violates the fourteenth amendment because it disproportionately affects minorities

21
Q

Roe v. Wade (1973)

A

State bans on all abortions are unconstitutional - states cannot control abortions during first trimester, can only limit in case of mother’s health in second trimester, and can protect fetus in third trimester

22
Q

Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992)

A

Loosened standards for evaluating restrictions on abortions

23
Q

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

A

Set up judicial review

24
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

A

Implied powers

25
Q

Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

A

Set broad definition of interstate commerce

26
Q

Buckley v. Valeo (1976)

A

Banned setting limits on amount a candidate may spend on their campaign

27
Q

Regents of the University of California v. Bakke (1978)

A

Specific quotas on race are impermissible, but race can be a factor in admission

28
Q

Texas v. Johnson (1989)

A

State cannot ban flag desecration

29
Q

TLO v. New Jersey (1985)

A

School officials only need a “reasonable suspicion” to conduct searches

30
Q

Acton v. Vernonia School District (1995)

A

Student athletes may be randomly drug tested