Court Cases Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland 1819

A

National supremacy over state in the law (because of a national bank… Power to tax involved the power to destroy so state cannot tax national)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Gibbons v Ogden 1824

A

Steamboat monopoly means national government controls commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dred Scott b. Sanford 1857

A

Chief Justice Taney argued that blacks couldn’t be citizens to be free or sue, claimed the Missouri compromise was unconstitutional because Slavs owners could take slaves into any territory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Minor v happersett 1875

A

14th amendment didn’t extend to women :(

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Reynolds v. U.S. 1879

A

Religious beliefs still cannot violate general law, i.e. Polygamy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Shenck v U.S. 1919

A

If words present a ‘clear and present danger” ie shouting ‘fire in a theater’ then it’s not a violation of rights to get in trouble for saying it. Because of an obstruction in the recruitment for WW1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gitlow v. NY 1925

A

First step in selective incorporation… States cannot limit social expression any more than federal government

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Near v. Minnesota 1931

A

States cannot have prior restraint either (articles dealing with public corruption)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Schechter Poultry v. U.S. 1935

A

Willfully sold diseased chickens, new deal NRA codes were violated, because the chickens had already been moved, it wasn’t states problems but NRA was declared unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Palko v Connecticut 1937

A

Protections from bill of rights are part of due process (Palko is still convicted of murder though) ie freedoms of speech , self incrimination right to counsel and speedy trial by jury

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Korematsu v US 1944

A

Upheld internment as constitutional, during wartime. 1988 allows congress to apologize and pay surviving internees

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Youngstown Sheet & tube v. Sawyer 1952

A

Truman attempted to halt a steel strike by taking steel mills, had to be given back because he overstepped executive power

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mapp v Ohio 1961

A

States are required to get search warrants (4th amendment) exclusionary rule is put in place. (Unless search warrant is in ‘good faith’)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Marbury v. Madison 1803

A

Judicial review

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Engle V. Vitale 1962

A

banned organized prayer in public schools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

baker v. Carr& Wesberry V. Sanders (1962-1964)

Reynolds V. Sims

A

one person, one vote, all should carry equal weight

17
Q

Gideon V. Wainwright (1963)

A

defended himself after being denied a lawyer, ruled court appointed attorneys are guarenteed

18
Q

Escobedo V. Illinois 1964

A

defendent’s attorney must be present during questioning

19
Q

New York Times v. Sullivan 1964

A

statements must be proven to be published with “reckless disregard for the truth”…. something was printed with error about Jackie Robinson

20
Q

Griswold V. Connecticut 1965

A

Griswold appealed after being sued for giving contraceptives to married couples, many amendments combined created certain ‘Penumbras” that gave a “zone of privacy” VOILA! The right to privacy

21
Q

Miranda v. Arizona 1966

A

must be informed of rights at arrest (attourney present, right to remain silent)

22
Q

Tinker V. Des Moines 1969

A

symbolic speech -black armbands worn in protest if the vietnam war by the M.B. Tinker

23
Q

Swann V. Charlotte Mecklenberg 1971

A

court ordered busing to achieve racial balance in schools

24
Q

Lemon V. Kurtzman 1971

A

“Lemon Test” whether things are too religious or not

25
Q

Furman v. Georgiamn 1972

A

issued stricter guidelines to capital punishment, because the death penalty was often dealt with Racial Bias

26
Q

Roe V. Wade 1973

A

strikes down laws prohibiting abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy

27
Q

United States v. Nixon 1974

A

nixon had no right to claim executive privelege in the case of refusing to hand over additional tapes

28
Q

Buckley V. Valeo 1976

A

rich can spend money on their own campaign as a part of “free speech”

29
Q

Bakke v. University of California 1978

A

affirmitive action cannot be reverse racist, strict racial quotas are unconstitutional

30
Q

Edwards v. Aguillard 1987

A

Louisiana could not require schools that taught evolution to teach creationism (Kitzmiller… cannot teach “intelligent design” it is religious.

31
Q

Webster v. Reproductive Health Services 1989

A

states can impose some regulations on abortion

32
Q

Employment Division (of Oregon) v. Smith 1990

A

regarding use of Peyote in religious worship… Free exercise clause does not apply to laws that are aimed at general behavior rather than specific religions… many exceptions would have to be written otherwise

33
Q

Planned Parenthood v. Casey 1992

A

state regulations cannot “unduly burden” a woman in her right to abortion… law mandating informed consent and a 24 hr waiting pd.

34
Q

Texas v. Johnson 1993

A

protects protestors of burning american flag (symbolic of free speech)

35
Q

Shaw v Reno 1993

A

blocks racial gerrymandering

36
Q

Kelo v. City of New London 2005

A

condemned homes in a neighboorhood can give acreage to private developer for commercial purposes did not violate 5th amendments “taking property must be for public purpose”

37
Q

stenberg v. Carhart 2000, Gonzales v. Carhart & Gonzales v. Planned Parenthood 2007

A

bans partial birth abortions, must protect mother (1st is nebraska, 2nd is national)